scholarly journals Contribution of Population Pharmacokinetics to Dose Optimization of Ganciclovir-Valganciclovir in Solid-Organ Transplant Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1992-2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Padullés ◽  
H. Colom ◽  
O. Bestard ◽  
E. Melilli ◽  
N. Sabé ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTTreatment of solid-organ transplant (SOT) patients with ganciclovir (GCV)-valganciclovir (VGCV) according to the manufacturer's recommendations may result in over- or underexposure. Bayesian prediction based on a population pharmacokinetics model may optimize GCV-VGCV dosing, achieving the area under the curve (AUC) therapeutic target. We conducted a two-arm, randomized, open-label, 40% superiority trial in adult SOT patients receiving GCV-VGCV as prophylaxis or treatment of cytomegalovirus infection. Group A was treated according to the manufacturer's recommendations. For group B, the dosing was adjusted based on target exposures using a Bayesian prediction model (NONMEM). Fifty-three patients were recruited (27 in group A and 26 in group B). About 88.6% of patients in group B and 22.2% in group A reached target AUC, achieving the 40% superiority margin (P< 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] difference, 47 to 86%). The time to reach target AUC was significantly longer in group A than in group B (55.9 ± 8.2 versus 15.8 ± 2.3 days,P< 0.001). A shorter time to viral clearance was observed in group B than in group A (12.5 versus 17.6 days;P= 0.125). The incidences of relapse (group A, 66.67%, and group B, 9.01%) and late-onset infection (group A, 36.7%, and group B, 7.7%) were higher in group A. Neutropenia and anemia were related to GCV overexposure. GCV-VCGV dose adjustment based on a population pharmacokinetics Bayesian prediction model optimizes GCV-VGCV exposure. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01446445.)

Author(s):  
Maria E Hasing ◽  
Xiaoli L Pang ◽  
Curtis Mabilangan ◽  
Jutta K Preiksaitis

Abstract Background The epidemiology of single versus multiple cytomegalovirus (CMV) strain transmission from donor (D+) to seronegative solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients (R−) is uncertain, as is whether “relapsing” recipient infection represents changing strain predominance when multiple strains are transmitted. Here we characterized CMV strain transmission patterns in D+/R− SOT recipients. Methods We studied pairs or groups of D+/R− SOT recipients who received organs from a common donor (group A) and recipients who experienced ≥2 waves of CMV DNAemia (group B). CMV in plasma was characterized by genotype-specific real-time PCR for genes gB and gH. Results Single concordant genotypes were identified in 12 of 18 recipient pairs/group sharing a common donor (group A); at least 6 of 18 (33%) donors transmitted &gt; 1 strain. A single CMV strain was detected in 14 of 15 recipients in group B; only 1 recipient had coinfection. A shift in CMV strain predominance occurred after the first posttransplant year in at least 4 recipients with coinfection. Conclusions Using a common donor approach, we confirmed that multiple CMV strain transmission from donors to R− SOT recipients is not uncommon. D+/R− SOT recipients with CMV coinfection can undergo changes in strain predominance in late waves of CMV DNAemia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 492-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose F. Camargo ◽  
Mariangela R. Resende ◽  
Ricardo Zamel ◽  
William Klement ◽  
Alyajahan Bhimji ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document