scholarly journals Supplemental Material: U-Pb zircon geochronology and depositional age models for the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation (Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona, USA): Implications for Late Triassic paleoecological and paleoenvironmental change

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Rasmussen ◽  
et al.
Keyword(s):  
National Park ◽  
Upper Triassic ◽  
Late Triassic ◽  
Zircon Geochronology ◽  
Paleoenvironmental Change ◽  
Chinle Formation ◽  
Petrified Forest National Park ◽  
Data Tables ◽  
Depositional Age ◽  
Petrified Forest

Assessing stratigraphic uncertainties between published dates and dates from CPCP 1A and two data tables.

scholarly journals Osteology of the Late Triassic aetosaur Scutarx deltatylus (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia)

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G Parker
Keyword(s):  
National Park ◽  
Vertebral Column ◽  
Upper Triassic ◽  
Late Triassic ◽  
Chinle Formation ◽  
Petrified Forest National Park ◽  
Petrified Forest

Aetosaurs are some of the most common fossils collected from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation of Arizona, especially at the Petrified Forest National Park. Four partial skeletons collected from the park from 2002 through 2009 represent the holotype and referred specimens of Scutarx deltatylus. These specimens include much of the carapace, as well as the vertebral column, and shoulder and pelvic girldles. A partial skull represents the first aetosaur skull recovered from Arizona since the 1930s. Scutarx deltatylus can be distinguished from closely related forms Calyptosuchus wellesi and Adamanasuchus eisenhardtae not only morphologically, but also stratigraphically. Thus, Scutarx deltatylus is potentially an index taxon for the upper part of the Adamanian biozone.

scholarly journals Osteology of the Late Triassic aetosaur Scutarx deltatylus (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia)

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G Parker
Keyword(s):  
National Park ◽  
Vertebral Column ◽  
Upper Triassic ◽  
Late Triassic ◽  
Chinle Formation ◽  
Petrified Forest National Park ◽  
Petrified Forest

Aetosaurs are some of the most common fossils collected from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation of Arizona, especially at the Petrified Forest National Park. Four partial skeletons collected from the park from 2002 through 2009 represent the holotype and referred specimens of Scutarx deltatylus. These specimens include much of the carapace, as well as the vertebral column, and shoulder and pelvic girldles. A partial skull represents the first aetosaur skull recovered from Arizona since the 1930s. Scutarx deltatylus can be distinguished from closely related forms Calyptosuchus wellesi and Adamanasuchus eisenhardtae not only morphologically, but also stratigraphically. Thus, Scutarx deltatylus is potentially an index taxon for the upper part of the Adamanian biozone.

The Late Triassic (Norian) Adamanian–Revueltian tetrapod faunal transition in the Chinle Formation of Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona

2010 ◽  
Vol 101 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 231-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Parker ◽  
Jeffrey W. Martz
Keyword(s):  
National Park ◽  
Upper Triassic ◽  
Late Triassic ◽  
Western North America ◽  
Faunal Turnover ◽  
Chinle Formation ◽  
Petrified Forest National Park ◽  
Land Vertebrate ◽  
Age Constraints ◽  
Petrified Forest

ABSTRACTRecent stratigraphic revisions of the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation of Petrified Forest National Park, in conjunction with precise and accurate documentation of fossil tetrapod occurrences, clarified the local biostratigraphy, with regional and global implications. A significant overlap between Adamanian and Revueltian faunas is rejected, as is the validity of the Lamyan sub-land vertebrate faunachron. The Adamanian–Revueltian boundary can be precisely placed within the lower Jim Camp Wash beds of the Sonsela Member and thus does not occur at the hypothesised Tr-4 unconformity. This mid-Norian faunal turnover, may coincide with a floral turnover, based on palynology studies and also on sedimentological evidence of increasing aridity. Available age constraints bracketing the turnover horizon are consistent with the age of the Manicouagan impact event. The rise of dinosaurs in western North America did not correspond to the Adamanian–Revueltian transition, and overall dinosauromorph diversity seems to have remained at a constant level across it. The paucity of detailed Late Triassic vertebrate biostratigraphic data and radioisotopic dates makes it currently impossible to either support or reject the existence of globally synchronous Late Triassic extinctions for tetrapods.

scholarly journals LA-ICPMS U–Pb geochronology of detrital zircon grains from the Coconino, Moenkopi, and Chinle formations in the Petrified Forest National Park (Arizona)

Geochronology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Gehrels ◽  
Dominique Giesler ◽  
Paul Olsen ◽  
Dennis Kent ◽  
Adam Marsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
National Park ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Late Triassic ◽  
Ionization Mass ◽  
Chinle Formation ◽  
Petrified Forest National Park ◽  
Cordilleran Margin ◽  
Petrified Forest

Abstract. Uranium–lead (U–Pb) geochronology was conducted by laser ablation – inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) on 7175 detrital zircon grains from 29 samples from the Coconino Sandstone, Moenkopi Formation, and Chinle Formation. These samples were recovered from ∼ 520 m of drill core that was acquired during the Colorado Plateau Coring Project (CPCP), located in Petrified Forest National Park (Arizona). A sample from the lower Permian Coconino Sandstone yields a broad distribution of Proterozoic and Paleozoic ages that are consistent with derivation from the Appalachian and Ouachita orogens, with little input from local basement or Ancestral Rocky Mountain sources. Four samples from the Holbrook Member of the Moenkopi Formation yield a different set of Precambrian and Paleozoic age groups, indicating derivation from the Ouachita orogen, the East Mexico arc, and the Permo-Triassic arc built along the Cordilleran margin. A total of 23 samples from the Chinle Formation contain variable proportions of Proterozoic and Paleozoic zircon grains but are dominated by Late Triassic grains. LA-ICPMS ages of these grains belong to five main groups that correspond to the Mesa Redondo Member, Blue Mesa Member and lower part of the Sonsela Member, upper part of the Sonsela Member, middle part of the Petrified Forest Member, and upper part of the Petrified Forest Member. The ages of pre-Triassic grains also correspond to these chronostratigraphic units and are interpreted to reflect varying contributions from the Appalachian orogen to the east, Ouachita orogen to the southeast, Precambrian basement exposed in the ancestral Mogollon Highlands to the south, East Mexico arc, and Permian–Triassic arc built along the southern Cordilleran margin. Triassic grains in each chronostratigraphic unit also have distinct U and thorium (Th) concentrations, which are interpreted to reflect temporal changes in the chemistry of arc magmatism. Comparison of our LA-ICPMS ages with available chemical abrasion thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA-TIMS) ages and new magnetostratigraphic data provides new insights into the depositional history of the Chinle Formation, as well as methods utilized to determine depositional ages of fluvial strata. For parts of the Chinle Formation that are dominated by fine-grained clastic strata (e.g., mudstone and siltstone), such as the Blue Mesa Member and Petrified Forest Member, all three chronometers agree (to within ∼ 1 Myr), and robust depositional chronologies have been determined. In contrast, for stratigraphic intervals dominated by coarse-grained clastic strata (e.g., sandstone), such as most of the Sonsela Member, the three chronologic records disagree due to recycling of older zircon grains and variable dilution of syn-depositional-age grains. This results in LA-ICPMS ages that significantly predate deposition and CA-TIMS ages that range between the other two chronometers. These complications challenge attempts to establish a well-defined chronostratigraphic age model for the Chinle Formation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document