Deciphering shallow mantle stratification through information dimension

D.S. Ramesh; P. Appala Raju; Nitin Sharma; S. Das Sharma

doi:10.1130/l117.1

Deciphering shallow mantle stratification through information dimension

Lithosphere ◽

10.1130/l117.1 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 2 (6) ◽

pp. 462-471 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

D.S. Ramesh ◽

P. Appala Raju ◽

Nitin Sharma ◽

S. Das Sharma

Keyword(s):

Information Dimension

Download Full-text

A new method to analyze species abundances in space using generalized dimensions

10.7287/peerj.preprints.745 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Leonardo A Saravia

Keyword(s):

Species Abundance ◽

Abundance Distribution ◽

Community Patterns ◽

Information Dimension ◽

Generalized Dimension ◽

Species Abundances ◽

Species Abundance Distributions ◽

Species Area ◽

Generalized Dimensions ◽

Relationship Of

Species-area relationships (SAR) and species abundance distributions (SAD) are among the most studied patterns in ecology, due to their application to both theoretical and conservation issues. One problem with these general patterns is that different theories can generate the same predictions, and for this reason they cannot be used to detect different mechanisms of community assembly. A solution is to search for more sensitive patterns, for example by extending the SAR to the whole species abundance distribution. A generalized dimension ($D_q$) approach has been proposed to study the scaling of SAD, but to date there has been no evaluation of the ability of this pattern to detect different mechanisms. An equivalent way to express SAD is the rank abundance distribution (RAD). Here I introduce a new way to study SAD scaling using a spatial version of RAD: the species-rank surface (SRS), which can be analyzed using $D_q$. Thus there is an old $D_q$ based on SAR ($D_q^{SAD}$), and a new one based on SRS ($D_q^{SRS}$). I perform spatial simulations to examine the relationship of $D_q$ with SAD, spatial patterns and number of species. Finally I compare the power of both $D_q$, SAD, SAR exponent, and the fractal information dimension to detect different community patterns using a continuum of hierarchical and neutral spatially explicit models. The SAD, $D_q^{SAD}$ and $D_q^{SRS}$ all had good performance in detecting models with contrasting mechanisms. $D_q^{SRS}$, however, had a better fit to data and allowed comparisons between hierarchical communities where the other methods failed. The SAR exponent and information dimension had low power and should not be used. SRS and $D_q^{SRS}$ could be interesting methods to study community or macroecological patterns.

Download Full-text