scholarly journals A new method to analyze species abundances in space using generalized dimensions

Author(s):  
Leonardo A Saravia

Species-area relationships (SAR) and species abundance distributions (SAD) are among the most studied patterns in ecology, due to their application to both theoretical and conservation issues. One problem with these general patterns is that different theories can generate the same predictions, and for this reason they cannot be used to detect different mechanisms of community assembly. A solution is to search for more sensitive patterns, for example by extending the SAR to the whole species abundance distribution. A generalized dimension ($D_q$) approach has been proposed to study the scaling of SAD, but to date there has been no evaluation of the ability of this pattern to detect different mechanisms. An equivalent way to express SAD is the rank abundance distribution (RAD). Here I introduce a new way to study SAD scaling using a spatial version of RAD: the species-rank surface (SRS), which can be analyzed using $D_q$. Thus there is an old $D_q$ based on SAR ($D_q^{SAD}$), and a new one based on SRS ($D_q^{SRS}$). I perform spatial simulations to examine the relationship of $D_q$ with SAD, spatial patterns and number of species. Finally I compare the power of both $D_q$, SAD, SAR exponent, and the fractal information dimension to detect different community patterns using a continuum of hierarchical and neutral spatially explicit models. The SAD, $D_q^{SAD}$ and $D_q^{SRS}$ all had good performance in detecting models with contrasting mechanisms. $D_q^{SRS}$, however, had a better fit to data and allowed comparisons between hierarchical communities where the other methods failed. The SAR exponent and information dimension had low power and should not be used. SRS and $D_q^{SRS}$ could be interesting methods to study community or macroecological patterns.

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo A Saravia

Species-area relationships (SAR) and species abundance distributions (SAD) are among the most studied patterns in ecology, due to their application to both theoretical and conservation issues. One problem with these general patterns is that different theories can generate the same predictions, and for this reason they cannot be used to detect different mechanisms of community assembly. A solution is to search for more sensitive patterns, for example by extending the SAR to the whole species abundance distribution. A generalized dimension ($D_q$) approach has been proposed to study the scaling of SAD, but to date there has been no evaluation of the ability of this pattern to detect different mechanisms. An equivalent way to express SAD is the rank abundance distribution (RAD). Here I introduce a new way to study SAD scaling using a spatial version of RAD: the species-rank surface (SRS), which can be analyzed using $D_q$. Thus there is an old $D_q$ based on SAR ($D_q^{SAD}$), and a new one based on SRS ($D_q^{SRS}$). I perform spatial simulations to examine the relationship of $D_q$ with SAD, spatial patterns and number of species. Finally I compare the power of both $D_q$, SAD, SAR exponent, and the fractal information dimension to detect different community patterns using a continuum of hierarchical and neutral spatially explicit models. The SAD, $D_q^{SAD}$ and $D_q^{SRS}$ all had good performance in detecting models with contrasting mechanisms. $D_q^{SRS}$, however, had a better fit to data and allowed comparisons between hierarchical communities where the other methods failed. The SAR exponent and information dimension had low power and should not be used. SRS and $D_q^{SRS}$ could be interesting methods to study community or macroecological patterns.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo A Saravia

Species-area relationships (SAR) and species abundance distributions (SAD) are among the most studied patterns in ecology, due to their application in both theoretical and conservation issues. One problem with these general patterns is that different theories can generate the same predictions, and for this reason they can not be used to detect different mechanisms. A solution for this is to search for more sensitive patterns. One possibility is to extend the SAR to the whole species abundance distribution. A generalized dimension (\(D_q\)) approach has been proposed to study the scaling of SAD, but there has been no evaluation of the ability of this pattern to detect different mechanisms. An equivalent way to express SAD is the rank abundance distribution (RAD). Here I introduce a new way to study scaling of SAD using a spatial version of RAD: the species-rank surface (SRS), which can be analyzed using \(D_q\). Thus there is an old \(D_q\) based on SAR (\(D_q^{SAD}\)), and a new one based on SRS (\(D_q^{SRS}\)). I perform spatial simulations to relate both \(D_q\) with SAD, spatial patterns and number of species. Finally I compare the power of both \(D_q\), SAD, SAR exponent, and the fractal information dimension to detect different community patterns using a continuum of hierarchical and neutral spatially explicit models. The SAD, \(D_q^{SAD}\) and \(D_q^{SRS}\) all had good performance in detecting models with contrasting mechanisms. \(D_q^{SRS}\) had a better fit to data and a strong ability to compare between hierarchical communities where the other methods failed. The SAR exponent and information dimension had low power and should not be used. SRS and \(D_q^{SRS}\) could be an interesting addition to study community or macroecological patterns.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo A Saravia

Species-area relationships (SAR) and species abundance distributions (SAD) are among the most studied patterns in ecology, due to their application in both theoretical and conservation issues. One problem with these general patterns is that different theories can generate the same predictions, and for this reason they can not be used to detect different mechanisms. A solution for this is to search for more sensitive patterns. One possibility is to extend the SAR to the whole species abundance distribution. A generalized dimension ($D_q$) approach has been proposed to study the scaling of SAD, but there has been no evaluation of the ability of this pattern to detect different mechanisms. An equivalent way to express SAD is the rank abundance distribution (RAD). Here I introduce a new way to study scaling of SAD using a spatial version of RAD: the species-rank surface (SRS), which can be analyzed using $D_q$. Thus there is an old $D_q$ based on SAR ($D_q^{SAD}$), and a new one based on SRS ($D_q^{SRS}$). I perform spatial simulations to relate both $D_q$ with SAD, spatial patterns and number of species. Finally I compare the power of both $D_q$, SAD, SAR exponent, and the fractal information dimension to detect different community patterns using a continuum of hierarchical and neutral spatially explicit models. The SAD, $D_q^{SAD}$ and $D_q^{SRS}$ all had good performance in detecting models with contrasting mechanisms. $D_q^{SRS}$ had a better fit to data and a strong ability to compare between hierarchical communities where the other methods failed. The SAR exponent and information dimension had low power and should not be used. SRS and $D_q^{SRS}$ could be an interesting addition to study community or macroecological patterns.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo A Saravia

Species-area relationships (SAR) and species abundance distributions (SAD) are among the most studied patterns in ecology, due to their application in both theoretical and conservation issues. One problem with these general patterns is that different theories can generate the same predictions, and for this reason they can not be used to detect different mechanisms. A solution for this is to search for more sensitive patterns. One possibility is to extend the SAR to the whole species abundance distribution. A generalized dimension (\(D_q\)) approach has been proposed to study the scaling of SAD, but there has been no evaluation of the ability of this pattern to detect different mechanisms. An equivalent way to express SAD is the rank abundance distribution (RAD). Here I introduce a new way to study scaling of SAD using a spatial version of RAD: the species-rank surface (SRS), which can be analyzed using \(D_q\). Thus there is an old \(D_q\) based on SAR (\(D_q^{SAD}\)), and a new one based on SRS (\(D_q^{SRS}\)). I perform spatial simulations to relate both \(D_q\) with SAD, spatial patterns and number of species. Finally I compare the power of both \(D_q\), SAD, SAR exponent, and the fractal information dimension to detect different community patterns using a continuum of hierarchical and neutral spatially explicit models. The SAD, \(D_q^{SAD}\) and \(D_q^{SRS}\) all had good performance in detecting models with contrasting mechanisms. \(D_q^{SRS}\) had a better fit to data and a strong ability to compare between hierarchical communities where the other methods failed. The SAR exponent and information dimension had low power and should not be used. SRS and \(D_q^{SRS}\) could be an interesting addition to study community or macroecological patterns.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo A Saravia

Species-area relationships (SAR) and species abundance distributions (SAD) are among the most studied patterns in ecology, due to their application in both theoretical and conservation issues. One problem with these general patterns is that different theories can generate the same predictions, and for this reason they can not be used to detect different mechanisms. A solution for this is to search for more sensitive patterns. One possibility is to extend the SAR to the whole species abundance distribution. A generalized dimension (\(D_q\)) approach has been proposed to study the scaling of SAD, but there has been no evaluation of the ability of this pattern to detect different mechanisms. An equivalent way to express SAD is the rank abundance distribution (RAD). Here I introduce a new way to study scaling of SAD using a spatial version of RAD: the species-rank surface (SRS), which can be analyzed using \(D_q\). Thus there is an old \(D_q\) based on SAR (\(D_q^{SAD}\)), and a new one based on SRS (\(D_q^{SRS}\)). I perform spatial simulations to relate both \(D_q\) with SAD, spatial patterns and number of species. Finally I compare the power of both \(D_q\), SAD, SAR exponent, and the fractal information dimension to detect different community patterns using a continuum of hierarchical and neutral spatially explicit models. The SAD, \(D_q^{SAD}\) and \(D_q^{SRS}\) all had good performance in detecting models with contrasting mechanisms. \(D_q^{SRS}\) had a better fit to data and a strong ability to compare between hierarchical communities where the other methods failed. The SAR exponent and information dimension had low power and should not be used. SRS and \(D_q^{SRS}\) could be an interesting addition to study community or macroecological patterns.


2002 ◽  
Vol 357 (1421) ◽  
pp. 667-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricard V. Solé ◽  
David Alonso ◽  
Alan McKane

Why are some ecosystems so rich, yet contain so many rare species? High species diversity, together with rarity, is a general trend in neotropical forests and coral reefs. However, the origin of such diversity and the consequences of food web complexity in both species abundances and temporal fluctuations are not well understood. Several regularities are observed in complex, multispecies ecosystems that suggest that these ecologies might be organized close to points of instability. We explore, in greater depth, a recent stochastic model of population dynamics that is shown to reproduce: (i) the scaling law linking species number and connectivity; (ii) the observed distributions of species abundance reported from field studies (showing long tails and thus a predominance of rare species); (iii) the complex fluctuations displayed by natural communities (including chaotic dynamics); and (iv) the species–area relations displayed by rainforest plots. It is conjectured that the conflict between the natural tendency towards higher diversity due to immigration, and the ecosystem level constraints derived from an increasing number of links, leaves the system poised at a critical boundary separating stable from unstable communities, where large fluctuations are expected to occur. We suggest that the patterns displayed by species–rich communities, including rarity, would result from such a spontaneous tendency towards instability.


1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter T. Hraber ◽  
Terry Jones ◽  
Stephanie Forrest

Echo is a generic ecosystem model in which evolving agents are situated in a resource-limited environment. The Echo model is described, and the behavior of Echo is evaluated on two well-studied measures of ecological diversity: relative species abundance and the species-area scaling relation. In simulation experiments, these measures are used to compare the behavior of Echo with that of a neutral model, in which selection on agent genotypes is random. These simulations show that the evolutionary component of Echo makes a significant contribution to its behavior and that Echo shows good qualitative agreement with naturally occurring species abundance distributions and species-area scaling relations.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato A. Ferreira de Lima ◽  
Paula Alves Condé ◽  
Cristina Banks-Leite ◽  
Renata C. Campos ◽  
Malva I. Medina Hernández ◽  
...  

AbstractMany authors have tried to explain the shape of the species abundance distribution (SAD). Some of them have suggested that sampling scale is an important factor shaping SADs. These suggestions, however, did not consider the indirect and well-known effect of sample size, which increases as samples are combined to generate SADs at larger scales. Here, we separate the effects of sample size and sampling scale on the shape of the SAD for three groups of organisms (trees, beetles and birds) sampled in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. We compared the observed SADs at different sampling scales with simulated SADs having the same richness, relative abundances but comparable sample sizes, to show that the main effect shaping SADs is sample size and not sampling scale. The effect of scale was minor and deviations between observed and simulated SADs were present only for beetles. For trees, the match between observed and simulated SADs was improved at all scales when we accounted for conspecific aggregation, which was even more important than the sampling scale effect. We build on these results to propose a conceptual framework where observed SADs are shaped by three main factors, in decreasing order of importance: sample size, conspecific aggregation and beta diversity. Therefore, studies comparing SADs across sites or scales should use sampling and/or statistical approaches capable of disentangling these three effects on the shape of SADs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document