Ground level enhancements of cosmic rays in solar cycle 24

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. V. Kravtsova ◽  
V. E. Sdobnov
Solar Physics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonty I. Miroshnichenko ◽  
Chuan Li ◽  
Victor G. Yanke

2015 ◽  
Vol 632 ◽  
pp. 012063 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Belov ◽  
E Eroshenko ◽  
O Kryakunova ◽  
N Nikolayevskiy ◽  
A Malimbayev ◽  
...  

Solar Physics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 289 (1) ◽  
pp. 423-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Papaioannou ◽  
G. Souvatzoglou ◽  
P. Paschalis ◽  
M. Gerontidou ◽  
H. Mavromichalaki

Solar Physics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 293 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. A. Augusto ◽  
C. E. Navia ◽  
M. N. de Oliveira ◽  
A. A. Nepomuceno ◽  
J. P. Raulin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prithvi Raj Singh ◽  
A. I. Saad Farid ◽  
Y. P. Singh ◽  
A. K. Singh ◽  
Ayman A. Aly

Abstract To study the solar rotational oscillation on daily averaged time series of solar activity proxies: sunspot number (SSN), modified coronal index (MCI), solar flare index (FI), and cosmic ray intensity (CRI) are subjected to Lomb/Scargle periodogram, and continuous wavelet transform. For this purpose, we have used data of all the considered parameters from 2012 to 2015, which covers the maximum phase including the polarity reversal period of the solar cycle 24. Both spectral analysis techniques are carried out to study the behavior of 27-days on the time scale of the synodic period and to follow their evolution throughout the epoch. Further, we have used R package RobPer (least square regression) techniques and obtained a significant true period ~27 days is present in this study. It is noted that the ~27-day period of solar activity parameters and cosmic rays is much prominent during the examined period.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Gil ◽  
Monika Berendt-Marchel ◽  
Renata Modzelewska ◽  
Szczepan Moskwa ◽  
Agnieszka Siluszyk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document