Structure of the upper mantle in Asia from phase and group velocities of Rayleigh waves

2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 622-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. B. Yanovskaya ◽  
V. M. Kozhevnikov ◽  
O. A. Solovei ◽  
K. R. Akchurin
1953 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Haskell

abstract A matrix formalism developed by W. T. Thomson is used to obtain the phase velocity dispersion equations for elastic surface waves of Rayleigh and Love type on multilayered solid media. The method is used to compute phase and group velocities of Rayleigh waves for two assumed three-layer models and one two-layer model of the earth's crust in the continents. The computed group velocity curves are compared with published values of the group velocities at various frequencies of Rayleigh waves over continental paths. The scatter of the observed values is larger than the difference between the three computed curves. It is believed that not all of this scatter is due to observational errors, but probably represents a real horizontal heterogeneity of the continental crusts.


1969 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 2017-2038
Author(s):  
J. A. Brooks

abstract A profile to 300 km beneath the southern New Guinea shield region reveals lower average shear velocities than beneath the Canadian Shield and slightly lower than the Gutenberg model. Disparity with Brune and Dorman's CANSD profile is greatest (0.3 km/sec) immediately beneath the Moho, but persists to more than 200 km depth and is interpreted to mean that upper mantle mineralogy beneath southern New Guinea differs from that beneath the Canadian shield. The numerical inversion technique of Dorman and Ewing was employed in a combined reduction of fundamental and first higher Rayleigh mode “single-station” phase velocities after isolating the approximate value of initial source phase using group velocities as a reference. Average crustal thickness, from fundamental mode data alone, is 33 ± 1 km over about 1500 km of southern New Guinea path, a figure consistent with an average Poisson's Ratio for the crust of 0.23 to 0.32.


1962 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Jack Oliver

Abstract Two sets of curves relating phase and group velocities of Love and Rayleigh waves to periods summarize our present state of knowledge on seismic surface wave dispersion. Periods range from about one second to one hour, and velocities from about one kilometer per second to about eight kilometers per second.


2021 ◽  
pp. 108128652110238
Author(s):  
Barış Erbaş ◽  
Julius Kaplunov ◽  
Isaac Elishakoff

A two-dimensional mixed problem for a thin elastic strip resting on a Winkler foundation is considered within the framework of plane stress setup. The relative stiffness of the foundation is supposed to be small to ensure low-frequency vibrations. Asymptotic analysis at a higher order results in a one-dimensional equation of bending motion refining numerous ad hoc developments starting from Timoshenko-type beam equations. Two-term expansions through the foundation stiffness are presented for phase and group velocities, as well as for the critical velocity of a moving load. In addition, the formula for the longitudinal displacements of the beam due to its transverse compression is derived.


Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1162-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Molyneux ◽  
Douglas R. Schmitt

Elastic‐wave velocities are often determined by picking the time of a certain feature of a propagating pulse, such as the first amplitude maximum. However, attenuation and dispersion conspire to change the shape of a propagating wave, making determination of a physically meaningful velocity problematic. As a consequence, the velocities so determined are not necessarily representative of the material’s intrinsic wave phase and group velocities. These phase and group velocities are found experimentally in a highly attenuating medium consisting of glycerol‐saturated, unconsolidated, random packs of glass beads and quartz sand. Our results show that the quality factor Q varies between 2 and 6 over the useful frequency band in these experiments from ∼200 to 600 kHz. The fundamental velocities are compared to more common and simple velocity estimates. In general, the simpler methods estimate the group velocity at the predominant frequency with a 3% discrepancy but are in poor agreement with the corresponding phase velocity. Wave velocities determined from the time at which the pulse is first detected (signal velocity) differ from the predominant group velocity by up to 12%. At best, the onset wave velocity arguably provides a lower bound for the high‐frequency limit of the phase velocity in a material where wave velocity increases with frequency. Each method of time picking, however, is self‐consistent, as indicated by the high quality of linear regressions of observed arrival times versus propagation distance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document