AB0954 Safety of Joint Puncture in Patients Anticoagulated with Acenocumarol

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 1115.3-1116
Author(s):  
C.A. Guillen Astete ◽  
C. Bouroncle Alaluna ◽  
A. Boteanu ◽  
M. Blazquez Cañamero ◽  
A. Zea Mendoza
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Andreas Voss ◽  
Christian G. Pfeifer ◽  
Maximilian Kerschbaum ◽  
Markus Rupp ◽  
Peter Angele ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Septic arthritis is a significant complication following arthroscopic surgery, with an estimated overall incidence of less than 1%. Despite the low incidence, an appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathway is required to avoid serious long-term consequences, eradicate the infection, and ensure good treatment outcomes. The aim of this current review article is to summarize evidence-based literature regarding diagnostic and therapeutic options of post-operative septic arthritis after arthroscopy. Methods Through a literature review, up-to-date treatment algorithms and therapies have been identified. Additionally, a supportive new algorithm is proposed for diagnosis and treatment of suspected septic arthritis following arthroscopic intervention. Results A major challenge in diagnostics is the differentiation of the post-operative status between a non-infected hyperinflammatory joint versus septic arthritis, due to clinical symptoms, (e.g., rubor, calor, or tumor) can appear identical. Therefore, joint puncture for microbiological evaluation, especially for fast leukocyte cell-count diagnostics, is advocated. A cell count of more than 20.000 leukocyte/µl with more than 70% of polymorphonuclear cells is the generally accepted threshold for septic arthritis. Conclusion The therapy is based on arthroscopic or open surgical debridement for synovectomy and irrigation of the joint, in combination with an adequate antibiotic therapy for 6–12 weeks. Removal of indwelling hardware, such as interference screws for ACL repair or anchors for rotator cuff repair, is recommended in chronic cases. Level of evidence IV.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 368-369
Author(s):  
Carlos Antonio Guillén Astete ◽  
María Terán Tinedo ◽  
José Renato Quiñones Torres ◽  
Mónica Luque Alarcón ◽  
Alina Boteanu

1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1047-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Trattnig ◽  
M. Breitenseher ◽  
M. Pretterklieber ◽  
G. Kontaxis ◽  
T. Rand ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 741-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Koivikko ◽  
S. K. Koskinen

Background: Magnetic resonance arthrography is a well-established diagnostic method in degenerative and traumatic disorders of the shoulder. Some radiologists prefer to apply a local anesthetic to the skin prior to performing the joint puncture. However, no information regarding the efficacy of local anesthetics exists. Purpose: To assess patient discomfort in arthrography injection. Material and Methods: A patient survey ( n = 74) utilizing a visual analog scale (VAS) measured the intensity of pain in arthrography injection by those receiving local anesthetics ( n = 36) versus those who did not ( n = 38). Results: Mean VAS scores were 20.8 (median 10.5, SD 24.3) for those receiving local anesthetics versus 19.3 (median 13.0, SD 20.7) for those who did not ( P = 0.83, Mann-Whitney U test). Conclusion: Routine use of local anesthesia of the skin in arthrography injection is unnecessary.


2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-153
Author(s):  
Akira FURUTANI ◽  
Masahiro MITUYOSHI ◽  
Kumiko YOSHIDA ◽  
Masahiko ONODA ◽  
Michinori IWAMURA ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 106107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Ertas ◽  
Tolga Gediz ◽  
Cagatay Ozdol ◽  
Ilke Ali Gurses ◽  
Merve Onder ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. E609-E612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Ikegami ◽  
Takashi Matsuoka ◽  
Yasuaki Aoki

2010 ◽  
Vol 92-B (1) ◽  
pp. 176-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Heidari ◽  
W. Pichler ◽  
S. Grechenig ◽  
W. Grechenig ◽  
A. M. Weinberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document