scholarly journals Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye.

1974 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 709-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Drasdo ◽  
C W Fowler
2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 280-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Ascough

AbstractIn modern approaches to biblical and classical studies enlightenment scientific models have dominated historical investigation. As such, the notion of memories and traditions, even when they are assumed to be invented, are presented as reflecting a linear projection of history, with singular causes of change. Modern science, however, has moved beyond the Newtonian view of mechanics that undergirds such a view and is working with models of chaos and complexity. Social scientists and humanists are lagging behind and are only now beginning to understand the implications for their disciplines. This paper adds another voice to the small but growing cadre of promoters of a non-linear notion of historiography by noting its implications for a project of redescribing Graeco-Roman antiquity.


2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 307 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Li ◽  
H. Zwick ◽  
B. Stuck ◽  
D. J. Lund

1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 6055-6060
Author(s):  
D.L. Xu ◽  
A.J. Morris ◽  
K.B. Martin

Photonics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 284
Author(s):  
Michael Simpson

Angles subtended at the second nodal point of the eye (NP2) are approximately the same as input visual angles over a very large angular range, despite the nodal point being a paraxial lens property. Raytracing using an average pseudophakic eye showed that the angular nodal point criterion was only valid up to about 10°, and that the linear relationship was due instead to the cornea and lens initially creating chief ray angles at the exit pupil that are about 0.83 times input values for this particular eye, and then by the retina curving around to meet the rays in a manner that compensates for increasing angle. This linear relationship is then also maintained when retinal intersections are calculated relative to other axial points, with angles rescaled approximately using the equation R/(R + delta), where delta is the axial distance from the center of a spherical retina of radius R. Angles at NP2 approximately match the input angles, but the terminology is misleading because this is not a paraxial property of the eye. Chief rays are used with finite raytracing to determine the actual behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document