scholarly journals Comparison of three commercial decision support platforms for matching of next-generation sequencing results with therapies in patients with cancer

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e000872
Author(s):  
Samantha O Perakis ◽  
Sabrina Weber ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
Ricarda Graf ◽  
Sabine Hojas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Precision Oncology ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Tier I

ObjectivePrecision oncology depends on translating molecular data into therapy recommendations. However, with the growing complexity of next-generation sequencing-based tests, clinical interpretation of somatic genomic mutations has evolved into a formidable task. Here, we compared the performance of three commercial clinical decision support tools, that is, NAVIFY Mutation Profiler (NAVIFY; Roche), QIAGEN Clinical Insight (QCI) Interpret (QIAGEN) and CureMatch Bionov (CureMatch).MethodsIn order to obtain the current status of the respective tumour genome, we analysed cell-free DNA from patients with metastatic breast, colorectal or non-small cell lung cancer. We evaluated somatic copy number alterations and in parallel applied a 77-gene panel (AVENIO ctDNA Expanded Panel). We then assessed the concordance of tier classification approaches between NAVIFY and QCI and compared the strategies to determine actionability among all three platforms. Finally, we quantified the alignment of treatment suggestions across all decision tools.ResultsEach platform varied in its mode of variant classification and strategy for identifying druggable targets and clinical trials, which resulted in major discrepancies. Even the frequency of concordant actionable events for tier I-A or tier I-B classifications was only 4.3%, 9.5% and 28.4% when comparing NAVIFY with QCI, NAVIFY with CureMatch and CureMatch with QCI, respectively, and the obtained treatment recommendations differed drastically.ConclusionsTreatment decisions based on molecular markers appear at present to be arbitrary and dependent on the chosen strategy. As a consequence, tumours with identical molecular profiles would be differently treated, which challenges the promising concepts of genome-informed medicine.

scholarly journals From Information Overload to Actionable Insights: Digital Solutions for Interpreting Cancer Variants from Genomic Testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-318
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Yaung ◽  
Adeline Pek
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Information Overload ◽  
Genomic Testing ◽  
Precision Oncology ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Support Software ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Given the increase in genomic testing in routine clinical use, there is a growing need for digital technology solutions to assist pathologists, oncologists, and researchers in translating variant calls into actionable knowledge to personalize patient management plans. In this article, we discuss the challenges facing molecular geneticists and medical oncologists in working with test results from next-generation sequencing for somatic oncology, and propose key considerations for implementing a decision support software to aid the interpretation of clinically important variants. In addition, we review results from an example decision support software, NAVIFY Mutation Profiler. NAVIFY Mutation Profiler is a cloud-based software that provides curation, annotation, interpretation, and reporting of somatic variants identified by next-generation sequencing. The software reports a tiered classification based on consensus recommendations from AMP, ASCO, CAP, and ACMG. Studies with NAVIFY Mutation Profiler demonstrated that the software provided timely updates and accurate curation, as well as interpretation of variant combinations, demonstrating that decision support tools can help advance implementation of precision oncology.

scholarly journals Precision Oncology in Sarcomas: Divide and Conquer

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Carmagnani Pestana ◽  
Roman Groisberg ◽  
Jason Roszik ◽  
Vivek Subbiah
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Divide And Conquer ◽  
Precision Oncology ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Mesenchymal Tumors ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Technology ◽  
Molecular Abnormalities ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies that exhibit remarkable heterogeneity, with more than 50 subtypes recognized. Advances in next-generation sequencing technology have resulted in the discovery of genetic events in these mesenchymal tumors, which in addition to enhancing understanding of the biology, have opened up avenues for molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy. This review focuses on how incorporation of next-generation sequencing has affected drug development in sarcomas and strategies for optimizing precision oncology for these rare cancers. In a significant percentage of soft tissue sarcomas, which represent up to 40% of all sarcomas, specific driver molecular abnormalities have been identified. The challenge to evaluate these mutations across rare cancer subtypes requires the careful characterization of these genetic alterations to further define compelling drivers with therapeutic implications. Novel models of clinical trial design also are needed. This shift would entail sustained efforts by the sarcoma community to move from one-size-fits-all trials, in which all sarcomas are treated similarly, to divide-and-conquer subtype-specific strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document