scholarly journals Ultraviolet suppression and nonlocality in optical model potentials for nucleon-nucleus scattering

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. F. Arellano ◽  
G. Blanchon
Keyword(s):  
Optical Model ◽  
Model Potentials ◽  
Nucleus Scattering

The optical model and the nucleon-nucleus scattering

1955 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 749-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kind ◽  
C. Villi
Keyword(s):  
Optical Model ◽  
Nucleus Scattering

Nonlocalities in Nuclear Optical-Model Potentials

1971 ◽  
Vol 26 (20) ◽  
pp. 1263-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis G. Arnold
Keyword(s):  
Optical Model ◽  
Model Potentials

The Energy Dependence of the Imaginary Nuclear Potential

1985 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 462-465
Author(s):  
Ernst F. Hefter
Keyword(s):  
Conservation Laws ◽  
Energy Dependence ◽  
Specific Energy ◽  
Optical Model ◽  
Mean Field ◽  
Field Method ◽  
Model Potential ◽  
Nuclear Potential ◽  
Optical Model Potential ◽  
Nucleus Scattering

Recently the inverse mean field method (Imefim) has been shown to lead to a specific energy dependence of the real central nuclear part, V, of the optical model potential for nucleon-nucleus scattering. Proceeding from V towards the imaginary volume term of the potential, Wυ, application of conservation laws yields a specific energy dependence for Wυ. It compares favourably with heuristic potentials.

Energy dependence of phenomenological optical-model potentials

1968 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lipperheide ◽  
A.K. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Energy Dependence ◽  
Optical Model ◽  
Model Potentials

Exchange contributions to optical-model potentials

1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 717-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip W. Coulter
Keyword(s):  
Optical Model ◽  
Model Potentials

Optical model potentials for He6+Zn64 from Cu63(Li7,He6)Zn64 reactions

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Yang ◽  
C. J. Lin ◽  
H. M. Jia ◽  
D. X. Wang ◽  
L. J. Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Model ◽  
Model Potentials

Detailed study for 16O → 12C + α and 12C → 11B + p spectroscopic factors

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1450061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sh. Hamada ◽  
N. Burtebayev ◽  
N. Amangeldi
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Excitation Function ◽  
Optical Model ◽  
Transfer Reaction ◽  
Spectroscopic Factor ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Angular Distributions ◽  
Model Potentials ◽  
Spectroscopic Factors ◽  
Double Folding

We have measured the angular distributions for 16 O elastically scattered on 12 C nuclei at energy 28 MeV and also for 12 C ion beam elastically scattered on 11 B target nuclei at energy 18 MeV. These measurements were performed in the cyclotron DC-60 INP NNC RK. Calculations were performed using both empirical Woods–Saxon and double folding optical model potentials. Both elastic scattering and transfer reaction were taken into consideration. We have extracted the spectroscopic factors for the configurations 16 O → 12 C + α and 12 C → 11 B + p and compared them with other calculated or extracted values at different energies from literature. The extracted spectroscopic factor for the configuration 12 C → 11 B + p from the current work is in the range 2.7–3.1, which is very close to Cohen–Kurath prediction. While for the configuration 16 O → 12 C + α, spectroscopic factors show fluctuation with energy which could be due to the well-known resonant-like behavior observed in 16 O + 12 C excitation function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document