scholarly journals TOWARD AN INVARIANT DEFINITION OF REPULSIVE GRAVITY

Author(s):  
ORLANDO LUONGO ◽  
HERNANDO QUEVEDO
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Benzke ◽  
Nora Brambilla ◽  
Miguel A. Escobedo ◽  
Antonio Vairo

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 692-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. B. Jupp ◽  
Keeva Vozoff

Despite the time that has passed since the original short discussion, I think some useful points can be made regarding the note by Esparza and Gómez‐Treviño. First, the authors are quite correct to point out that (3) of their note is not a rotation invariant definition of phase as was claimed in the original discussion. This slip most likely carried into later texts unchallenged. The fact is, however, that (3) is rotation invariant for a 2‐D earth. It was in this context that the change was made to the definition in Vozoff (1971).


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Volná ◽  
Zbynĕk Urban

AbstractThe paper is devoted to the interior Euler-Lagrange operator in field theory, representing an important tool for constructing the variational sequence. We give a new invariant definition of this operator by means of a natural decomposition of spaces of differential forms, appearing in the sequence, which defines its basic properties. Our definition extends the well-known cases of the Euler-Lagrange class (Euler-Lagrange form) and the Helmholtz class (Helmholtz form). This linear operator has the property of a projector, and its kernel consists of contact forms. The result generalizes an analogous theorem valid for variational sequences over 1-dimensional manifolds and completes the known heuristic expressions by explicit characterizations and proofs.


2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (05) ◽  
pp. 757-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. PONCE DE LEON

In the Randall–Sundrum brane-world scenario and other non-compact Kaluza–Klein theories, the motion of test particles is higher-dimensional in nature. In other words, all test particles travel on five-dimensional geodesics but observers, who are bounded to spacetime, have access only to the 4D part of the trajectory. Conventionally, the dynamics of test particles as observed in 4D is discussed on the basis of the splitting of the geodesic equation in 5D. However, this procedure is not unique and therefore leads to some problems. The most serious one is the ambiguity in the definition of rest mass in 4D, which is crucial for the discussion of the dynamics. We propose the Hamilton–Jacobi formalism, instead of the geodesic one, to study the dynamics in 4D. On the basis of this formalism we provide an unambiguous expression for the rest mass and its variation along the motion as observed in 4D. It is independent of the coordinates and any parameterization used along the motion. Moreover, we are able to show a comprehensive picture of the various physical scenarios allowed in 4D, without having to deal with the subtle details of the splitting formalism. Moreover we study the extra non-gravitational forces perceived by an observer in 4D who describes the geodesic motion of a bulk test particle in 5D. Firstly, we show that the so-called fifth force fails to account for the variation of rest mass along the particle's worldline. Secondly, we offer here a new definition that correctly takes into account the change of mass observed in 4D.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document