scholarly journals EXPANSION FORMULAE FOR ONE- AND TWO-CENTER CHARGE DENSITIES OVER COMPLETE ORTHONORMAL SETS OF EXPONENTIAL TYPE ORBITALS AND THEIR USE IN EVALUATION OF MULTICENTER–MULTIELECTRON INTEGRALS

2009 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 597-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. I. GUSEINOV

The series expansion formulae are established for the one- and two-center charge densities over complete orthonormal sets of Ψα-exponential type orbitals (Ψα-ETO α = 1,0,-1,-2,…) introduced by the author. Three-center overlap integrals of Ψα appearing in these relations are expressed through the two-center overlap integrals between Ψα-orbitals. The general formulae obtained for the charge densities are utilized for the evaluation of arbitrary multicenter–multielectron integrals occurring when the complete orthonormal sets of Ψα-ETO are used as basis functions in the Hartree–Fock–Roothaan and explicitly correlated methods. The relationships for charge densities and multicenter–multielectron integrals obtained are valid for the arbitrary quantum numbers, screening constants, and location of Ψα-orbitals.

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 837-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. I. GUSEINOV ◽  
B. A. MAMEDOV

By the use of complete orthonormal sets of Ψα-exponential type orbitals (Ψα-ETOs, where α =1, 0, -1, -2, …), the series expansion formulae are established for the one- and two-electron multicenter integrals of arbitrary Yukawa-like screened central and noncentral interaction potentials (YSCPs and YSNCPs) in terms of two- and three-center overlap integrals of three Slater type orbitals (STOs). The convergence of the series is tested by the concrete cases of parameters. The formulae given in this study for the evaluation of one- and two-electron multicenter integrals of YSCPs and YSNCPs show good rate of convergence and numerical stability.


2007 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 641-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. I. GUSEINOV ◽  
B. A. MAMEDOV

Using complete orthonormal sets of Ψα-exponential type orbitals (Ψα- ETO , α = 1, 0, -1, -2,…), the three-center overlap integrals over noninteger n STO (NISTO) appearing in the evaluation of multicenter–multielectron integrals of central and noncentral interaction potentials are calculated. The final results are expressed in terms of one- or two-center overlap integrals between NISTO and integer n STO (ISTO). The formulas obtained are valid for arbitrary noninteger principal quantum numbers, screening parameters, and location of NSTO.


2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj K. Kesharwani ◽  
Amir Karton ◽  
Nitai Sylvetsky ◽  
Jan M. L. Martin

The S66 benchmark for non-covalent interactions has been re-evaluated using explicitly correlated methods with basis sets near the one-particle basis set limit. It is found that post-MP2 ‘high-level corrections’ are treated adequately well using a combination of CCSD(F12*) with (aug-)cc-pVTZ-F12 basis sets on the one hand, and (T) extrapolated from conventional CCSD(T)/heavy-aug-cc-pV{D,T}Z on the other hand. Implications for earlier benchmarks on the larger S66×8 problem set in particular, and for accurate calculations on non-covalent interactions in general, are discussed. At a slight cost in accuracy, (T) can be considerably accelerated by using sano-V{D,T}Z+ basis sets, whereas half-counterpoise CCSD(F12*)(T)/cc-pVDZ-F12 offers the best compromise between accuracy and computational cost.


2008 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. I. GUSEINOV

Using one-center expansion relations for the Slater type orbitals (STOs) of noninteger principal quantum numbers in terms of integer nSTOs derived in this study with the help of ψa-exponential type orbitals (ψa-ETOs, a = 1, 0, -1, -2,…), the general formulas through the integer nSTOs are established for the unsymmetrical and symmetrical one-range addition theorems for STOs and Coulomb–Yukawa-like correlated interaction potentials (CIPs) with integer and noninteger indices. The final results are especially useful for the computations of arbitrary multicenter multielectron integrals that arise in the Hartree–Fock–Roothaan (HFR) approximation and also in the correlated methods based upon the use of STOs as basis functions.


1986 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 1598-1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Bhattacharya ◽  
S. C. Dhabal

1998 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Stahn ◽  
M. Möhle ◽  
U. Pietsch

The current best sets of X-ray structure amplitudes for GaAs, gallium arsenide, are completed by highly precise data recorded at 0.50 < sin θ/λ < 1.35 Å−1. For the strong reflections the required accuracy of ΔF/F ≤ 1% was realized by the use of Pendellösung measurements at λ = 0.30 Å, recording the integral intensities as a function of the effective thickness from ∼500 µm thick GaAs wafers. Additionally, several weak reflections were determined from their integral intensities within the kinematic limit at wavelengths λ = 0.3, 0.56 and 0.71 Å. From these data individual Debye–Waller factors for gallium and arsenic were determined using the model of independent spherical atoms [B Ga = 0.666 (4) and B As = 0.566 (4) Å2]. The extended set of experimental structure factors now available is compared with those obtained by ab initio solid-state Hartree–Fock (HF) and density functional (DF) calculations. Therefore, the theoretical data were adapted to room temperature using the experimentally evaluated Debye–Waller factors and the model mentioned above. The valence and difference charge densities obtained from experimental and theoretical data show the expected charge accumulation between nearest neighbours slightly shifted towards the arsenic site. The disagreement remaining between the experimental and theoretical data, on the one hand, and between those of both ab initio methods, on the other hand, are of the same order of magnitude.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar Kesharwani ◽  
Amir Karton ◽  
Nitai Sylvetsky ◽  
Jan M. L. Martin

<p>The S66 benchmark for noncovalent interactions has been re-evaluated using explicitly correlated methods with basis sets near the one-particle basis set limit. It is found that post-MP2 “high-level corrections” are treated adequately well using a combination of CCSD(F12*) with (aug-)cc-pVTZ-F12 basis sets on the one hand, and (T) extrapolated from conventional CCSD(T)/heavy-aug-cc-pV{D,T}Z on the other hand. Implications for earlier benchmarks on the larger S66x8 problem set in particular, and for accurate calculations on noncovalent interactions in general, are discussed. At a slight cost in accuracy, (T) can be considerably accelerated by using sano-V{D,T}Z+ basis sets, while half-counterpoise CCSD(F12*)(T)/cc-pVDZ-F12 offers the best compromise between accuracy and computational cost.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document