A new method for determining magnetization direction from gravity and magnetic anomalies: application to the deep structure of the Worcester Graben

1995 ◽  
Vol 152 (3) ◽  
pp. 561-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. ATES ◽  
P. KEAREY
Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 938-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto Mendonça

The Poisson theorem establishes a linear relationship between the gravity and magnetic potentials arising from common dense and magnetized bodies with constant magnetization–density ratio and magnetization direction. For geological formations satisfying such constraints (i.e., the Poisson conditions), this theorem provides suitable relationships between the gravity and magnetic anomalies that are useful in interpreting the related data sets. In such applications, both magnetization–density ratio (MDR) and magnetization direction can be estimated, thus helping the subsurface geological mapping from potential field data acquired on the earth's surface. However, no existing method is fully automatic, which has hampered extensive use in routine applications. Such a drawback follows the adoption of equations that, although obeying the Poisson theorem, relate particular components of the gravity and magnetic fields, thus requiring either a known magnetization direction or the implementation of iterative procedures to determine it. To allow one‐pass estimates for both MDR and magnetization direction (more precisely, its inclination projected on the plane normal to the source strike), this paper presents simple analytical solutions for these parameters by relating suitable gravity and magnetic vector fields that are derived from the gravity and magnetic data sets. Because current geophysical surveys usually provide only a single‐field component, a data processing scheme is developed to determine the required components in evaluating the desired vector fields. This is done by applying suitable linear transformations on the measured components according to well‐established filtering techniques in processing gravity and magnetic data. Except for distortions from noise, the proposed method automatically determines the MDR and the projected magnetization inclination for the underlying rocks everywhere the Poisson conditions are satisfied. Two‐dimensional sources are assumed, but no constraint upon their depth and cross‐section shape is required. Distorted estimates only appear close to the sources where at least one of the Poisson conditions is violated. In this case, the proposed technique furnishes apparent values for the rock properties. The abrupt changes of apparent values over contacts detect edges, thus facilitating the mapping of geological boundaries. The proposed technique is used to interpret two profiles across the Appalachian fold belt from the eastern portion of the State of Georgia, and the results are compared with some of the geological information available for the area.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 89-117
Author(s):  
Anthony Brian Watts

Martin Bott was a geophysicist who made fundamental contributions to our understanding of gravity and magnetic anomalies and their geological interpretation. His research on the deep structure of the Earth's crust was both pioneering and innovative, and he showed how field geophysical measurements could be used to address geological problems such as the mechanics of granite emplacement, sedimentary basin formation and mountain building. When he began his research, the use of gravity and magnetic anomalies to understand deep crustal structure was in its infancy and largely confined to research laboratories in the oil and gas industry. Four decades later his lifetime efforts have seen the emergence of potential field methods as one of the principal means of constraining the structure, stress state and long-term strength of the Earth's crust and upper mantle in continents and oceans. Martin was an inspiring undergraduate teacher and outstanding supervisor, as reflected by his many research students who went on to prominent leadership positions in academia, government and industry. He leaves a legacy of more than 150 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals and a lucidly written and beautifully illustrated textbook. As well as his many scientific achievements, Martin was an accomplished mountaineer, a dedicated churchgoer and an avid gardener. He saw no conflict between his science and his enduring Christian faith.


Geophysics ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 610-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao C. Ku

A computational method, which combines the Gaussian quadrature formula for numerical integration and a cubic spline for interpolation in evaluating the limits of integration, is employed to compute directly the gravity and magnetic anomalies caused by 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape and arbitrary magnetic polarization. The mathematics involved in this method is indeed old and well known. Furthermore, the physical concept of the Gaussian quadrature integration leads us back to the old concept of equivalent point masses or equivalent magnetic point dipoles: namely, the gravity or magnetic anomaly due to a body can be evaluated simply by a number of equivalent points which are distributed in the “Gaussian way” within the body. As an illustration, explicit formulas are given for dikes and prisms using 2 × 2 and 2 × 2 × 2 point Gaussian quadrature formulas. The basic limitation in the equivalent‐point method is that the distance between the point of observation and the equivalent points must be larger than the distance between the equivalent points within the body. By using a reasonable number of equivalent points or dividing the body into a number of smaller subbodies, the method might provide a useful alternative for computing in gravity and magnetic methods. The use of a simplified cubic spline enables us to compute the gravity and magnetic anomalies due to bodies of arbitrary shape and arbitrary magnetic polarization with ease and a certain degree of accuracy. This method also appears to be quite attractive for terrain corrections in gravity and possibly in magnetic surveys.


Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. D429-D444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Liu ◽  
Xiangyun Hu ◽  
Tianyou Liu ◽  
Jie Feng ◽  
Wenli Gao ◽  
...  

Remanent magnetization and self-demagnetization change the magnitude and direction of the magnetization vector, which complicates the interpretation of magnetic data. To deal with this problem, we evaluated a method for inverting the distributions of 2D magnetization vector or effective susceptibility using 3C borehole magnetic data. The basis for this method is the fact that 2D magnitude magnetic anomalies are not sensitive to the magnetization direction. We calculated magnitude anomalies from the measured borehole magnetic data in a spatial domain. The vector distributions of magnetization were inverted methodically in two steps. The distributions of magnetization magnitude were initially solved based on magnitude magnetic anomalies using the preconditioned conjugate gradient method. The preconditioner determined by the distances between the cells and the borehole observation points greatly improved the quality of the magnetization magnitude imaging. With the calculated magnetization magnitude, the distributions of magnetization direction were computed by fitting the component anomalies secondly using the conjugate gradient method. The two-step approach made full use of the amplitude and phase anomalies of the borehole magnetic data. We studied the influence of remanence and demagnetization based on the recovered magnetization intensity and direction distributions. Finally, we tested our method using synthetic and real data from scenarios that involved high susceptibility and complicated remanence, and all tests returned favorable results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document