Consensus costs and conflict in a collective movement

Author(s):  
Timothy Solum ◽  
Brent E. Eskridge ◽  
Ingo Schlupp
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 20160207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinnosuke Nakayama ◽  
Jennifer L. Harcourt ◽  
Rufus A. Johnstone ◽  
Andrea Manica

During collective movement, bolder individuals often emerge as leaders. Here, we investigate whether this reflects a greater propensity of bold individuals to initiate movement, or a preference for shy individuals to follow a bolder leader. We set up trios of stickleback fish comprising a focal individual who was either bold or shy, and one other individual of each personality. We then recorded the movements of all individuals in and out of cover in a foraging context to determine how assiduously the focal fish followed the movements of each other partner. We found that a shy focal fish preferred to follow a leader whose personality matched its own, but we did not detect such a difference in bold fish. Despite this preference, however, the greater propensity of bold individuals to initiate movements out of cover meant that they successfully led more joint trips. Thus, when offered a choice of leaders, sticklebacks prefer to follow individuals whose personality matches their own, but bolder individuals may, nevertheless, be able to impose their leadership, even among shy followers, simply through greater effort.


Author(s):  
Juri F. Buchmüller ◽  
Udo Schlegel ◽  
Eren Cakmak ◽  
Daniel A. Keim ◽  
Evanthia Dimara

eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin ◽  
Damien R Farine ◽  
Margaret C Crofoot ◽  
Iain D Couzin

For group-living animals traveling through heterogeneous landscapes, collective movement can be influenced by both habitat structure and social interactions. Yet research in collective behavior has largely neglected habitat influences on movement. Here we integrate simultaneous, high-resolution, tracking of wild baboons within a troop with a 3-dimensional reconstruction of their habitat to identify key drivers of baboon movement. A previously unexplored social influence – baboons’ preference for locations that other troop members have recently traversed – is the most important predictor of individual movement decisions. Habitat is shown to influence movement over multiple spatial scales, from long-range attraction and repulsion from the troop’s sleeping site, to relatively local influences including road-following and a short-range avoidance of dense vegetation. Scaling to the collective level reveals a clear association between habitat features and the emergent structure of the group, highlighting the importance of habitat heterogeneity in shaping group coordination.


2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander John ◽  
Andreas Schadschneider ◽  
Debashish Chowdhury ◽  
Katsuhiro Nishinari
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 103093
Author(s):  
Harin Lee ◽  
Jacques Launay ◽  
Lauren Stewart

2009 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 1811-1821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaddiel Yonathan Ouaknin ◽  
Pinhas Zvi Bar-Yoseph
Keyword(s):  

Ethology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 546-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Zirbes ◽  
Jean-Louis Deneubourg ◽  
Yves Brostaux ◽  
Eric Haubruge
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document