scholarly journals Paced breathing and phrenic nerve responses evoked by epidural stimulation following complete high cervical spinal cord injury in rats

2018 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Bezdudnaya ◽  
Michael A. Lane ◽  
Vitaliy Marchenko

Spinal cord injury (SCI) at the level of cervical segments often results in life-threatening respiratory complications and requires long-term mechanical ventilator assistance. Thus restoring diaphragm activity and regaining voluntary control of breathing are the primary clinical goals for patients with respiratory dysfunction following cervical SCI. Epidural stimulation (EDS) is a promising strategy that has been explored extensively for nonrespiratory functions and to a limited extent within the respiratory system. The goal of the present study is to assess the potential for EDS at the location of the phrenic nucleus (C3–C5) innervating the diaphragm: the main inspiratory muscle following complete C1 cervical transection. To avoid the suppressive effect of anesthesia, all experiments were performed in decerebrate, C1 cervical transection, unanesthetized, nonparalyzed ( n = 13) and paralyzed ( n = 7) animals. Our results show that C4 segment was the most responsive to EDS and required the lowest threshold of current intensity, affecting tracheal pressure and phrenic nerve responses. High-frequency (200–300 Hz) EDS applied over C4 segment (C4-EDS) was able to maintain breathing with normal end-tidal CO2 level and raise blood pressure. In addition, 100–300 Hz of C4-EDS showed time- and frequency-dependent changes (short-term facilitation) of evoked phrenic nerve responses that may serve as a target mechanism for pacing of phrenic motor circuits. The present work provides the first report of successful EDS at the level of phrenic nucleus in a complete SCI animal model and offers insight into the potential therapeutic application in patients with high cervical SCI. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present work offers the first demonstration of successful life-supporting breathing paced by epidural stimulation (EDS) at the level of the phrenic nucleus, following a complete spinal cord injury in unanesthetized, decerebrate rats. Moreover, our experiments showed time- and frequency-dependent changes of evoked phrenic nerve activity during EDS that may serve as a target mechanism for pacing spinal phrenic motor networks.

Spinal Cord ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 895-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Romero ◽  
C Gambarrutta ◽  
A Garcia-Forcada ◽  
M A Marín ◽  
E Diaz de la Lastra ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Vedantam ◽  
Gerald Eckardt ◽  
Marjorie C. Wang ◽  
Brian Schmit ◽  
Shekar N. Kurpad

Cell Reports ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 654-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared M. Cregg ◽  
Kevin A. Chu ◽  
Lydia E. Hager ◽  
Rachel S.J. Maggard ◽  
Daimen R. Stoltz ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (21) ◽  
pp. 3058-3065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyandysha V. Zholudeva ◽  
Jordyn S. Karliner ◽  
Kimberly J. Dougherty ◽  
Michael A. Lane

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 2344-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa J. Gonzalez-Rothi ◽  
Kristi A. Streeter ◽  
Marie H. Hanna ◽  
Anna C. Stamas ◽  
Paul J. Reier ◽  
...  

C2 spinal hemilesion (C2Hx) paralyzes the ipsilateral diaphragm, but recovery is possible through activation of “crossed spinal” synaptic inputs to ipsilateral phrenic motoneurons. We tested the hypothesis that high-frequency epidural stimulation (HF-ES) would potentiate ipsilateral phrenic output after subacute and chronic C2Hx. HF-ES (300 Hz) was applied to the ventrolateral C4 or T2 spinal cord ipsilateral to C2Hx in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated adult rats. Stimulus duration was 60 s, and currents ranged from 100 to 1,000 µA. Bilateral phrenic nerve activity and ipsilateral hypoglossal (XII) nerve activity were recorded before and after HF-ES. Higher T2 stimulus currents potentiated ipsilateral phasic inspiratory activity at both 2 and 12 wk post-C2Hx, whereas higher stimulus currents delivered at C4 potentiated ipsilateral phasic phrenic activity only at 12 wk ( P = 0.028). Meanwhile, tonic output in the ipsilateral phrenic nerve reached 500% of baseline values at the high currents with no difference between 2 and 12 wk. HF-ES did not trigger inspiratory burst-frequency changes. Similar responses occurred following T2 HF-ES. Increases in contralateral phrenic and XII nerve output were induced by C4 and T2 HF-ES at higher currents, but the relative magnitude of these changes was small compared with the ipsilateral phrenic response. We conclude that following incomplete cervical spinal cord injury, HF-ES of the ventrolateral midcervical or thoracic spinal cord can potentiate efferent phrenic motor output with little impact on inspiratory burst frequency. However, the substantial increases in tonic output indicate that the uninterrupted 60-s stimulation paradigm used is unlikely to be useful for respiratory muscle activation after spinal injury. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous studies reported that high-frequency epidural stimulation (HF-ES) activates the diaphragm following acute spinal transection. This study examined HF-ES and phrenic motor output following subacute and chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Short-term potentiation of phrenic bursting following HF-ES illustrates the potential for spinal stimulation to induce respiratory neuroplasticity. Increased tonic phrenic output indicates that alternatives to the continuous stimulation paradigm used in this study will be required for respiratory muscle activation after spinal cord injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document