Selectivity for orientation and direction of motion of single neurons in cat striate and extrastriate visual cortex

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1529-1543 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Gizzi ◽  
E. Katz ◽  
R. A. Schumer ◽  
J. A. Movshon
Keyword(s):  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Directional Selectivity ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Directional Tuning ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Complex Cells ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Direction Of Movement

1. We consider the consequences of the orientation selectivity shown by most cortical neurons for the nature of the signals they can convey about the direction of stimulus movement. On theoretical grounds we distinguish component direction selectivity, in which cells are selective for the direction of movement of oriented components of a complex stimulus, from pattern direction selectivity, or selectivity for the overall direction of movement of a pattern irrespective of the directions of its components. We employed a novel test using grating and plaid targets to distinguish these forms of direction selectivity. 2. We studied the responses of 280 cells from the striate cortex and 107 cells from the lateral suprasylvian cortex (LS) to single sinusoidal gratings to determine their orientation preference and directional selectivity. We tested 73 of these with sinusoidal plaids, composed of two sinusoidal gratings at different orientations, to study the organization of the directional mechanisms within the receptive field. 3. When tested with single gratings, the directional tuning of 277 oriented cells in area 17 had a mean half width of 20.6 degrees, a mode near 13 degrees, and a range of 3.8-58 degrees. Simple cells were slightly more narrowly tuned than complex cells. The selectivity of LS neurons for the direction of moving gratings is not markedly different from that of neurons in area 17. The mean direction half width was 20.7 degrees. 4. We evaluated the directional selectivity of these neurons by comparing responses to stimuli moved in the optimal direction with those elicited by a stimulus moving in the opposite direction. In area 17 about two-thirds of the neurons responded less than half as well to the non-preferred direction as to the preferred direction; two-fifths of the units responded less than one-fifth as well. Complex cells showed a somewhat greater tendency to directional bias than simple cells. LS neurons tended to have stronger directional asymmetries in their response to moving gratings: 83% of LS neurons showed a significant directional asymmetry. 5. Neurons in both areas responded independently to each component of the plaid. Thus cells giving single-lobed directional-tuning curves to gratings showed bilobed plaid tuning curves, with each lobe corresponding to movement in an effective direction by one of the two component gratings within the plaid. The two best directions for the plaids were those at which one or other single grating would have produced an optimal response when presented alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Evaluation of a linear model of directional selectivity in simple cells of the cat's striate cortex

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 421-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Tolhurst ◽  
A. F. Dean
Keyword(s):  
Linear Model ◽  
Linear Theory ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Directional Selectivity ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Direction Of Movement ◽  
Directional Preference ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractWe have compared the responses of simple cells to laterally moving sinusoidal gratings and to stationary temporally-modulated gratings. From the amplitudes and temporal phases of the responses to stationary gratings of different spatial phases, it should be possible to predict the preferred direction of movement, the amplitudes of the responses to gratings moving in the preferred and nonpreferred directions and, thence, the degree of directional preference (Reid et al., 1987). The preferred direction can be predicted reliably. However, the magnitude of the directional preference cannot be predicted, since the measured amplitude of the response in the nonpreferred direction of movement is very much less than that predicted by a linear theory. Nonlinearities in the relationship between response amplitude and contrast may contribute to the failure of the predictions, but this contribution is small. We conclude that the magnitude of the directional preference seems to be determined predominantly by nonlinear suppression of the response in the nonpreferred direction of movement.

scholarly journals Substructure of Direction-Selective Receptive Fields in Macaque V1

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 2743-2759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret S. Livingstone ◽  
Bevil R. Conway
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Positive Interactions ◽  
Null Direction ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Complex Cells ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Orientation Axis ◽  
Interaction Regions ◽  
Simple And Complex Cells

We used two-dimensional (2-D) sparse noise to map simultaneous and sequential two-spot interactions in simple and complex direction-selective cells in macaque V1. Sequential-interaction maps for both simple and complex cells showed preferred-direction facilitation and null-direction suppression for same-contrast stimulus sequences and the reverse for inverting-contrast sequences, although the magnitudes of the interactions were weaker for the simple cells. Contrast-sign selectivity in complex cells indicates that direction-selective interactions in these cells must occur in antecedent simple cells or in simple-cell-like dendritic compartments. Our maps suggest that direction selectivity, and on andoff segregation perpendicular to the orientation axis, can occur prior to receptive-field elongation along the orientation axis. 2-D interaction maps for some complex cells showed elongated alternating facilitatory and suppressive interactions as predicted if their inputs were orientation-selective simple cells. The negative interactions, however, were less elongated than the positive interactions, and there was an inflection at the origin in the positive interactions, so the interactions were chevron-shaped rather than band-like. Other complex cells showed only two round interaction regions, one negative and one positive. Several explanations for the map shapes are considered, including the possibility that directional interactions are generated directly from unoriented inputs.

scholarly journals Strobe Rearing Reduces Direction Selectivity in Area 17 by Altering Spatiotemporal Receptive-Field Structure

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 2991-3004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen L. Humphrey ◽  
Alan B. Saul
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Field Structure ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Directional Tuning ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Spatiotemporal Receptive Field

Humphrey, Allen L. and Alan B. Saul. Strobe rearing reduces direction selectivity in area 17 by altering spatiotemporal receptive-field structure. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2991–3004, 1998. Direction selectivity in simple cells of cat area 17 is linked to spatiotemporal (S-T) receptive-field structure. S-T inseparable receptive fields display gradients of response timing across the receptive field that confer a preferred direction of motion. Receptive fields that are not direction selective lack gradients; they are S-T separable, displaying uniform timing across the field. Here we further examine this link using a developmental paradigm that disrupts direction selectivity. Cats were reared from birth to 8 mo of age in 8-Hz stroboscopic illumination. Direction selectivity in simple cells was then measured using gratings drifting at different temporal frequencies (0.25–16 Hz). S-T structure was assessed using stationary bars presented at different receptive-field positions, with bar luminance being modulated sinusoidally at different temporal frequencies. For each cell, plots of response phase versus bar position were fit by lines to characterize S-T inseparability at each temporal frequency. Strobe rearing produced a profound loss of direction selectivity at all temporal frequencies; only 10% of cells were selective compared with 80% in normal cats. The few remaining directional cells were selective over a narrower than normal range of temporal frequencies and exhibited weaker than normal direction selectivity. Importantly, the directional loss was accompanied by a virtual elimination of S-T inseparability. Nearly all cells were S-T separable, like nondirectional cells in normal cats. The loss was clearest in layer 4. Normally, inseparability is greatest there, and it correlates well ( r = 0.77) with direction selectivity; strobe rearing reduced inseparability and direction selectivity to very low values. The few remaining directional cells were inseparable. In layer 6 of normal cats, most direction-selective cells are only weakly inseparable, and there is no consistent relationship between the two measures. However, after strobe rearing, even the weak inseparability was eliminated along with direction selectivity. The correlated changes in S-T structure and direction selectivity were confirmed using conventional linear predictions of directional tuning based on responses to counterphasing bars and white noise stimuli. The developmental changes were permanent, being observed up to 12 yr after strobe rearing. The deficits were remarkably specific; strobe rearing did not affect spatial receptive-field structure, orientation selectivity, spatial or temporal frequency tuning, or general responsiveness to visual stimuli. These results provide further support for a critical role of S-T structure in determining direction selectivity in simple cells. Strobe rearing eliminates directional tuning by altering the timing of responses within the receptive field.

Interocular transfer of adaptation after effect in neurons of area 17 and 18 of split chiasm cats

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 966-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Maffei ◽  
N. Berardi ◽  
S. Bisti
Keyword(s):  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Interocular Transfer ◽  
Optic Chiasm ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Complex Cells ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
After Effect ◽  
Contralateral Eye ◽  
Callosal Pathway

Responses to sinusoidal gratings for neurons in area 17 and 18 of split chiasm cats were recorded extracellularly, and the interocular transfer of the effect of adaptation to high-contrast gratings was studied. In area 17 all but one of the simple cells showed the phenomenon of adaptation and its interocular transfer; 60% of the complex cells showed the effect of adaptation, and of these cells 35% showed an interocular transfer of adaptation. The adaptation aftereffect was comparable both in strength and duration for the direct and the callosal pathway. The strength of the adaptation aftereffect through the callosal pathway was not related to the strength of the input from the contralateral eye. An interocular transfer of the adaptation aftereffect was found in several neurons with a very weak input from the contralateral eye and in five simple cells apparently responding only to the ipsilateral eye. Fifty-eight percent of the neurons in area 18 showed the effect of adaptation, and 55% of them showed interocular transfer. No interocular transfer of the adaptation aftereffect was found in those neurons where an input from the contralateral eye was undetectable. Interocular transfer of the adaptation was found in all the neurons recorded in area 17 of animals with section of the corpus callosum but intact chiasm. No interocular transfer was found in neurons recorded in area 17 of cats with both the optic chiasm and the corpus callosum sectioned. We conclude that callosal connections are sufficient for the transfer of the adaptation aftereffect, although they are not necessary.

Inhibitory Contributions to Spatiotemporal Receptive-Field Structure and Direction Selectivity in Simple Cells of Cat Area 17

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1212-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Murthy ◽  
Allen L. Humphrey
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Field Structure ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Directional Tuning ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Layer 4 ◽  
Two Measures ◽  
Spatiotemporal Receptive Field

Inhibitory contributions to spatiotemporal receptive-field structure and direction selectivity in simple cells of cat area 17. Intracortical inhibition contributes to direction selectivity in primary visual cortex, but how it acts has been unclear. We investigated this problem in simple cells of cat area 17 by taking advantage of the link between spatiotemporal (S-T) receptive-field structure and direction selectivity. Most cells in layer 4 have S-T–oriented receptive fields in which gradients of response timing across the field confer a preferred direction of motion. Linear summation of responses across the receptive field, followed by a static nonlinear amplification, has been shown previously to account for directional tuning in layer 4. We tested the hypotheses that inhibition acts by altering S-T structure or the static nonlinearity or both. Drifting and counterphasing sinewave gratings were used to measure direction selectivity and S-T structure, respectively, in 17 layer 4 simple cells before and during iontophoresis of bicuculline methiodide (BMI), a GABAA antagonist. S-T orientation was quantified from fits to response temporal phase versus stimulus spatial phase data. Bicuculline reduced direction selectivity and S-T orientation in nearly all cells, and reductions in the two measures were well correlated ( r = 0.81) and reversible. Using conventional linear predictions based on response phase and amplitude, we found that BMI-induced changes in S-T structure also accounted well for absolute changes in the amplitude and phase of responses to gratings drifting in the preferred and nonpreferred direction. For each cell we also calculated an exponent used to estimate the static nonlinearity. Bicuculline reduced the exponent in most cells, but the changes were not correlated with reductions in direction selectivity. We conclude that GABAA-mediated inhibition influences directional tuning in layer 4 primarily by sculpting S-T receptive-field structure. The source of the inhibition is likely to be other simple cells with certain spatiotemporal relationships to their target. Despite reductions in the two measures, most receptive fields maintained some directional tuning and S-T orientation during BMI. This suggests that their excitatory inputs, arising from the lateral geniculate nucleus and within area 17, are sufficient to create some S-T orientation and that inhibition accentuates it. Finally, BMI also reduced direction selectivity in 8 of 10 simple cells tested in layer 6, but the reductions were not accompanied by systematic changes in S-T structure. This reflects the fact that S-T orientation, as revealed by our first-order measures of the receptive field, is weak there normally. Inhibition likely affects layer 6 cells via more complex, nonlinear interactions.

Direction selectivity of cells in the cat's striate cortex: Differences between bar and grating stimuli

1992 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Casanova ◽  
J. P. Nordmann ◽  
I. Ohzawa ◽  
R. D. Freeman
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Simple Cell ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Complex Cells ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Standard Techniques ◽  
Selective Behavior

AbstractWe have investigated the notion that directional responses of cells in the visual cortex depend on the type of stimulus used to drive the cell. Specifically, we have asked if sinusoidal gratings provide a different estimate of direction selectivity than bars that are brighter or darker than the background.Using standard techniques, we recorded from 176 cells in the visual cortex of nine cats. For each cell, bright bars, dark bars, and sinusoidal gratings were presented in a randomly interleaved fashion. Complex cells exhibited around twice as many direction-selective as nondirection-selective responses. Estimates of direction selectivity were nearly identical for bright and dark bars and for gratings. For simple cells, a similar ratio of direction-selective to nondirection-selective responses was observed for gratings. However, a larger proportion of simple cells were classified as direction selective when bars were used for stimulation.A simple cell that exhibited direction selectivity to a grating behaved in a similar manner when stimulated with bright or dark bars. However, in contrast to complex cells, some simple cells classed as directionally nonselective on the basis of their responses to gratings, displayed directionally selective behavior to bars. In addition, the preferred directions for dark and bright bars sometimes differed. These results demonstrate that the classification of a simple cell as directionally selective or nonselective can depend critically on the visual stimulus used.

Direction-selective adaptation in simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1314-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Marlin ◽  
S. J. Hasan ◽  
M. S. Cynader
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Selective Adaptation ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Complex Cells ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Directional Preference ◽  
Simple And Complex Cells ◽  
Cat Striate Cortex

1. The selectivity of adaptation to unidirectional motion was examined in neurons of the cat striate cortex. Following prolonged stimulation with a unidirectional high-contrast grating, the responsivity of cortical neurons was reduced. In many units this decrease was restricted to the direction of prior stimulation. This selective adaptation produced changes in the degree of direction selectivity of the cortical units (as measured by the ratio of the response to motion in the preferred direction to that in the nonpreferred direction). 2. The initial strength of the directional preference of a given cortical unit did not determine the degree of direction-selective adaptation. Indeed, even non-direction-selective units could exhibit pronounced direction-selective adaptation. The degree of direction-selective adaptation was also independent of the overall decrease in responsivity during adaptation. 3. There was no difference between simple and complex cells in the total amount of adaptation observed. The selectivity of the adaptation, however, did differ between these two cell types. As a group, simple cells showed significant direction-selective adaptation, whereas complex cells did not. The directional preference of most simple cells decreased following preferred direction adaptation and many highly direction selective simple cells became non-direction selective. In addition, simple cells became significantly more direction selective following nonpreferred direction adaptation. 4. Some complex cells also demonstrated direction-selective adaptation. There was, however, much more variability among complex cells than simple cells. Some complex cells actually increased direction selectivity following preferred direction adaptation. These differences between simple and complex cells suggest that changes in direction selectivity following unidirectional adaptation are not due to simple neuronal fatigue of the unit being recorded, but depend on selective adaptation of afferent inputs to the unit. 5. The spontaneous activity of many cortical neurons decreased following preferred direction adaptation but increased following adaptation in the nonpreferred direction. The response to a stationary grating also decreased following preferred direction adaptation. However, there was very little change in the response to a stationary grating following adaptation in the nonpreferred direction.

scholarly journals Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1885-1898 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Heeger
Keyword(s):  
Linear Prediction ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Linear Operators ◽  
Simple Cell ◽  
Physiological Data ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Model Cell ◽  
Actual Response

1. A longstanding view of simple cells is that they sum their inputs linearly. However, the linear model falls short of a complete account of simple-cell direction selectivity. We have developed a nonlinear model of simple-cell responses (hereafter referred to as the normalization model) to explain a larger body of physiological data. 2. The normalization model consists of an underlying linear stage along with two additional nonlinear stages. The first is a half-squaring nonlinearity; half-squaring is half-wave rectification followed by squaring. The second is a divisive normalization non-linearity in which each model cell is suppressed by the pooled activity of a large number of cells. 3. By comparing responses with counterphase (flickering) gratings and drifting gratings, researchers have demonstrated that there is a nonlinear contribution to simple-cell responses. Specifically they found 1) that the linear prediction from counterphase grating responses underestimates a direction index computed from drifting grating responses, 2) that the linear prediction correctly estimates responses to gratings drifting in the preferred direction, and 3) that the linear prediction overestimates responses to gratings drifting in the nonpreferred direction. 4. We have simulated model cell responses and derived mathematical expressions to demonstrate that the normalization model accounts for this empirical data. Specifically the model behaves as follows. 1) The linear prediction from counterphase data underestimates the direction index computed from drifting grating responses. 2) The linear prediction from counterphase data overestimates the response to gratings drifting in the nonpreferred direction. The discrepancy between the linear prediction and the actual response is greater when using higher contrast stimuli. 3) For an appropriate choice of contrast, the linear prediction from counterphase data correctly estimates the response to gratings drifting in the preferred direction. For higher contrasts the linear prediction overestimates the actual response, and for lower contrasts the linear prediction underestimates the actual response. 5. In addition, the normalization model is qualitatively consistent with data on the dynamics of simple-cell responses. Tolhurst et al. found that simple cells respond with an initial transient burst of activity when a stimulus first appears. The normalization model behaves similarly; it takes some time after a stimulus first appears before the model cells are fully normalized. We derived the dynamics of the model and found that the transient burst of activity in model cells depends in a particular way on stimulus contrast. The burst is short for high-contrast stimuli and longer for low-contrast stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Directional selectivity and spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Reid ◽  
R. E. Soodak ◽  
R. M. Shapley
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Linear Prediction ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Quantitative Measure ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Orientation Contrast ◽  
Cat Striate Cortex

1. Simple cells in cat striate cortex were studied with a number of stimulation paradigms to explore the extent to which linear mechanisms determine direction selectivity. For each paradigm, our aim was to predict the selectivity for the direction of moving stimuli given only the responses to stationary stimuli. We have found that the prediction robustly determines the direction and magnitude of the preferred response but overestimates the nonpreferred response. 2. The main paradigm consisted of comparing the responses of simple cells to contrast reversal sinusoidal gratings with their responses to drifting gratings (of the same orientation, contrast, and spatial and temporal frequencies) in both directions of motion. Although it is known that simple cells display spatiotemporally inseparable responses to contrast reversal gratings, this spatiotemporal inseparability is demonstrated here to predict a certain amount of direction selectivity under the assumption that simple cells sum their inputs linearly. 3. The linear prediction of the directional index (DI), a quantitative measure of the degree of direction selectivity, was compared with the measured DI obtained from the responses to drifting gratings. The median value of the ratio of the two was 0.30, indicating that there is a significant nonlinear component to direction selectivity. 4. The absolute magnitudes of the responses to gratings moving in both directions of motion were compared with the linear predictions as well. Whereas the preferred direction response showed only a slight amount of facilitation compared with the linear prediction, there was a significant amount of nonlinear suppression in the nonpreferred direction. 5. Spatiotemporal inseparability was demonstrated also with stationary temporally modulated bars. The time course of response to these bars was different for different positions in the receptive field. The degree of spatiotemporal inseparability measured with sinusoidally modulated bars agreed quantitatively with that measured in experiments with stationary gratings. 6. A linear prediction of the responses to drifting luminance borders was compared with the actual responses. As with the grating experiments, the prediction was qualitatively accurate, giving the correct preferred direction but underestimating the magnitude of direction selectivity observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Processing of form and motion in area 21a of cat visual cortex

1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Dreher ◽  
A. Michalski ◽  
R. H. T. Ho ◽  
C. W. F. Lee ◽  
W. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Horizontal Strip ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Mean Width ◽  
Area 21A ◽  
The Mean

AbstractExtracellular recordings from single neurons have been made from presumed area 21a of the cerebral cortex of the cat, anesthetized with N2O/O2/sodium pentobarbitone mixture. Area 21a contains mainly a representation of a central horizontal strip of contralateral visual field about 5 deg above and below the horizontal meridian.Excitatory discharge fields of area 21a neurons were substantially (or slightly but significantly) larger than those of neurons at corresponding eccentricities in areas 17, 19, or 18, respectively. About 95% of area 21a neurons could be activated through either eye and the input from the ipsilateral eye was commonly dominant. Over 90% and less than 10% of neurons had, respectively, C-type and S-type receptive-field organization. Virtually all neurons were orientation-selective and the mean width at half-height of the orientation tuning curves at 52.9 deg was not significantly different from that of neurons in areas 17 and 18. About 30% of area 21a neurons had preferred orientations within 15 deg of the vertical.The mean direction-selectivity index (32.8%) of area 21a neurons was substantially lower than the indices for neurons in areas 17 or 18. Only a few neurons exhibited moderately strong end-zone inhibition. Area 21a neurons responded poorly to fast-moving stimuli and the mean preferred velocity at about 12.5 deg/s was not significantly different from that for area 17 neurons.Selective pressure block of Y fibers in contralateral optic nerve resulted in a small but significant reduction in the preferred velocities of neurons activated via the Y-blocked eye. By contrast, removal of the Y input did not produce significant changes in the spatial organization of receptive fields (S or C type), the size of the discharge fields, the width of orientation tuning curves, or direction-selectivity indices.Our results are consistent with the idea that area 21a receives its principal excitatory input from area 17 and is involved mainly in form rather than motion analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document