Neurotransmitter Involvement in Development and Maintenance of the Auditory Space Map in the Guinea Pig Superior Colliculus

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 2941-2953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil J. Ingham ◽  
Sally K. Thornton ◽  
Damian McCrossan ◽  
Deborah J. Withington

Ingham, Neil J., Sally K. Thornton, Damian McCrossan, and Deborah J. Withington. Neurotransmitter involvement in development and maintenance of the auditory space map in the guinea pig superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2941–2953, 1998. The mammalian superior colliculus (SC) is a complex area of the midbrain in terms of anatomy, physiology, and neurochemistry. The SC bears representations of the major sensory modalites integrated with a motor output system. It is implicated with saccade generation, in behavioral responses to novel sensory stimuli and receives innervation from diverse regions of the brain using many neurotransmitter classes. Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (Elvax-40W polymer) was used here to deliver chronically neurotransmitter receptor antagonists to the SC of the guinea pig to investigate the potential role played by the major neurotransmitter systems in the collicular representation of auditory space. Slices of polymer containing different drugs were implanted onto the SC of guinea pigs before the development of the SC azimuthal auditory space map, at ∼20 days after birth (DAB). A further group of animals was exposed to aminophosphonopentanoic acid (AP5) at ∼250 DAB. Azimuthal spatial tuning properties of deep layer multiunits of anesthetized guinea pigs were examined ∼20 days after implantation of the Elvax polymer. Broadband noise bursts were presented to the animals under anechoic, free-field conditions. Neuronal responses were used to construct polar plots representative of the auditory spatial multiunit receptive fields (MURFs). Animals exposed to control polymer could develop a map of auditory space in the SC comparable with that seen in unimplanted normal animals. Exposure of the SC of young animals to AP5, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, or atropine, resulted in a reduction in the proportion of spatially tuned responses with an increase in the proportion of broadly tuned responses and a degradation in topographic order. Thus N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA glutamate receptors and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors appear to play vital roles in the development of the SC auditory space map. A group of animals exposed to AP5 beginning at ∼250 DAB produced results very similar to those obtained in the young group exposed to AP5. Thus NMDA glutamate receptors also seem to be involved in the maintenance of the SC representation of auditory space in the adult guinea pig. Exposure of the SC of young guinea pigs to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor blocking agents produced some but not total disruption of the spatial tuning of auditory MURFs. Receptive fields were large compared with controls, but a significant degree of topographical organization was maintained. GABA receptors may play a role in the development of fine tuning and sharpening of auditory spatial responses in the SC but not necessarily in the generation of topographical order of the these responses.

Author(s):  
Bettina Blatt ◽  
Eva von Linstow Roloff ◽  
Deborah J. Withington ◽  
Euan M. Macphail ◽  
Gernot Riedel

1987 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 688-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Middlebrooks

This study explores the mechanisms of auditory spatial tuning in the superior colliculus of the anesthetized cat by correlating spatial tuning within specific regions of space with particular types of binaural interaction. The auditory spatial tuning of units was measured using a movable, broad-band stimulus presented in a free sound field. The contribution of each ear to the response of a unit was identified by acutely plugging one or the other ear. Every unit became largely or entirely unresponsive when a foam-rubber earplug was placed in the ear contralateral to the recording site. Thus, every unit exhibited an excitatory or facilitatory influence from the contralateral ear. A plug placed in the ipsilateral ear had different effects on different units. For half of the units (16/32), an ipsilateral earplug produced increases in the sizes of the units' receptive fields and increases in the magnitudes of their responses to stimuli presented from most locations. Thus, these units exhibited inhibition from the ipsilateral ear. Another class of units (9/32) exhibited ipsilateral facilitation, in that an ipsilateral earplug caused decreases in the sizes of the units' receptive fields and prominent decreases in their response magnitudes. For the remaining units (7/32), an ipsilateral earplug resulted in decreases in the sizes of the units' receptive fields, but produced both decreases in the responses of units to stimuli presented in their best areas and increases in the responses to stimuli presented away from the best areas. Thus these units exhibited mixed facilitatory and inhibitory ipsilateral influences. The influence of an ipsilateral earplug on a unit's response tended to correlate with its spatial tuning. The region of space within which a sound source was most effective in activating a unit was its “best area”. The best areas of units exhibiting ipsilateral inhibition were located furthest peripherally, those of units showing ipsilateral facilitation were located furthest frontally, and the best areas of units showing mixed ipsilateral influences were located in an intermediate area. The frequency tuning of units measured using a free-field tone source also tended to correlate with the locations of their best areas. Half of the units tested (27/54) responded to tones of the sound pressure levels (SPLs) that were used (up to 50 dB SPL).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


1994 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Withington ◽  
KE Binns ◽  
NJ Ingham ◽  
SK Thornton

1994 ◽  
Vol 636 (2) ◽  
pp. 348-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. Withington ◽  
K.E. Binns ◽  
N.J. Ingham ◽  
S.K. Thornton

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2197-2209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua I. Gold ◽  
Eric I. Knudsen

Bimodal, auditory-visual neurons in the optic tectum of the barn owl are sharply tuned for sound source location. The auditory receptive fields (RFs) of these neurons are restricted in space primarily as a consequence of their tuning for interaural time differences and interaural level differences across broad ranges of frequencies. In this study, we examined the extent to which frequency-specific features of early auditory experience shape the auditory spatial tuning of these neurons. We manipulated auditory experience by implanting in one ear canal an acoustic filtering device that altered the timing and level of sound reaching the eardrum in a frequency-dependent fashion. We assessed the auditory spatial tuning at individual tectal sites in normal owls and in owls raised with the filtering device. At each site, we measured a family of auditory RFs using broadband sound and narrowband sounds with different center frequencies both with and without the device in place. In normal owls, the narrowband RFs for a given site all included a common region of space that corresponded with the broadband RF and aligned with the site's visual RF. Acute insertion of the filtering device in normal owls shifted the locations of the narrowband RFs away from the visual RF, the magnitude and direction of the shifts depending on the frequency of the stimulus. In contrast, in owls that were raised wearing the device, narrowband and broadband RFs were aligned with visual RFs so long as the device was in the ear but not after it was removed, indicating that auditory spatial tuning had been adaptively altered by experience with the device. The frequency tuning of tectal neurons in device-reared owls was also altered from normal. The results demonstrate that experience during development adaptively modifies the representation of auditory space in the barn owl's optic tectum in a frequency-dependent manner.


1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. King ◽  
D. R. Moore ◽  
M. E. Hutchings

1. We have investigated the role of monaural cues provided by the outer ear in the construction of a map of auditory space in the superior colliculus. Single-unit recordings were made from the superior colliculus of adult ferrets that were deprived of binaural inputs by surgically ablating the ipsilateral cochlea on postnatal day 21 or 24. 2. The spatial response properties of auditory units in the deeper layers of this nucleus were studied using white-noise bursts presented under free-field conditions in an anechoic chamber. The thresholds of the units recorded in the monaural ferrets were not significantly different from those recorded in the superior colliculus of normal adult ferrets. In both groups the unit thresholds varied by 30-50 dB in each region of the superior colliculus. 3. In normal and monaural ferrets the elevation tuning tended to be sharper than the azimuth tuning. At sound levels of approximately 10 dB above threshold the auditory units recorded in both groups of animals were tuned to a specific region of space that was restricted in azimuth and elevation. The spatial location at which the maximum response was obtained (auditory best position) varied topographically in azimuth along the rostrocaudal axis of the nucleus and in elevation along the mediolateral axis. 4. The azimuthal distribution of best positions associated with each recording location in the superior colliculus of the monaural ferrets and the alignment between this dimension of the auditory map and that of the visual map in the overlying superficial layers were no different from those found at corresponding near-threshold sound levels in normal ferrets. 5. Elevation spatial selectivity was examined in a smaller sample of units. Although elevation best positions shifted downward from the medial to the lateral side of the nucleus in both normal and monaural ferrets, we found that the topography of the auditory representation and its alignment with the visual representation were statistically different in the two groups of animals. 6. Increasing the sound level does not affect the representation of auditory space in normal ferrets. However, when the stimulus level presented to monoaural ferrets was increased, the receptive fields either expanded so that the responses were no longer tuned to any particular region of space, or the responses remained tuned but exhibited a marked shift in the value of the best position.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document