scholarly journals Adopting Ambulatory Breast Cancer Surgery as the Standard of Care in an Asian Population

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Ying Ru Ng ◽  
Patrick Mun Yew Chan ◽  
Juliana Jia Chuan Chen ◽  
Melanie Dee Wern Seah ◽  
Christine Teo ◽  
...  

Introduction. Ambulatory surgery is not commonly practiced in Asia. A 23-hour ambulatory (AS23) service was implemented at our institute in March 2004 to allow more surgeries to be performed as ambulatory procedures. In this study, we reviewed the impact of the AS23 service on breast cancer surgeries and reviewed surgical outcomes, including postoperative complications, length of stay, and 30-day readmission.Methods. Retrospective review was performed of 1742 patients who underwent definitive breast cancer surgery from 1 March 2004 to 31 December 2010.Results. By 2010, more than 70% of surgeries were being performed as ambulatory procedures. Younger women (P<0.01), those undergoing wide local excision (P<0.01) and those with ductal carcinoma-in situ or early stage breast cancer (P<0.01), were more likely to undergo ambulatory surgery. Six percent of patients initially scheduled for ambulatory surgery were eventually managed as inpatients; a third of these were because of perioperative complications. Wound complications, 30-day readmission and reoperation rates were not more frequent with ambulatory surgery.Conclusion. Ambulatory breast cancer surgery is now the standard of care at our institute. An integrated workflow facilitating proper patient selection and structured postoperativee outpatient care have ensured minimal complications and high patient acceptance.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e666-e676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Greenup ◽  
Christel Rushing ◽  
Laura Fish ◽  
Brittany M. Campbell ◽  
Lisa Tolnitch ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Financial toxicity is a well-recognized adverse effect of cancer care, yet little is known about how women consider treatment costs when facing preference-sensitive decisions for breast cancer surgery or how surgical treatment choice affects financial harm. We sought to determine how financial costs and burden relate to decisions for breast cancer surgery. METHODS: Women (≥ 18 years old) with a history of breast cancer were recruited from the Army of Women and Sisters Network to complete an 88-item electronic survey. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to evaluate the impact of costs on surgical decisions and financial harm after breast cancer surgery. RESULTS: A total of 607 women with stage 0 to III breast cancer were included. Most were white (90%), were insured privately (70%) or by Medicare (25%), were college educated (78%), and reported household incomes of more than $74,000 (56%). Forty-three percent underwent breast-conserving surgery, 25% underwent mastectomy, 32% underwent bilateral mastectomy, and 36% underwent breast reconstruction. Twenty-eight percent reported that costs of treatment influenced their surgical decisions, and at incomes of $45,000 per year, costs were prioritized over breast preservation or appearance. Overall, 35% reported financial burden as a result of their cancer treatment, and 78% never discussed costs with their cancer team. When compared with breast-conserving surgery, bilateral mastectomy with or without reconstruction was significantly associated with higher incurred debt, significant to catastrophic financial burden, treatment-related financial hardship, and altered employment. Among the highest incomes, 65% of women were fiscally unprepared, reporting higher-than-expected (26%) treatment costs. CONCLUSION: Cancer treatment costs influenced decisions for breast cancer surgery, and comparably effective surgical treatments differed significantly in their risk of patient-reported financial burden, debt, and impact on employment. Cost transparency may inform preference-sensitive surgical decisions and improve patient-centered care.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Nussbaumer ◽  
NG Maggi ◽  
L Castrezana ◽  
L Zehnpfennig ◽  
I Oberhauser ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2437-2438
Author(s):  
Ashlyn E. Whitlock ◽  
Benjamin G. Allar ◽  
Ted James

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 214-215
Author(s):  
A. Karanikolic ◽  
D. Budjevac ◽  
L. Djordjevic ◽  
L.J. Paunkovic ◽  
N. Djordjevic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document