scholarly journals Postoperative Etoricoxib versus Ketoprofen Administration for Pain Management after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Simona Cionac Florescu ◽  
Denisa Madalina Anastase ◽  
Ana Maria Munteanu ◽  
Cristian Ioan Stoica

Objective. This randomized double-blind study compared the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib versus ketoprofen in 165 patients with elective total primary knee arthroplasty. Methods. After ethical committee approval, 165 patients were randomized in 3 groups: the etoricoxib group (E) receiving etoricoxib 120 mg/day, at the end of surgery and in the first postoperative day; the ketoprofen group (K) receiving ketoprofen 2 pills of 100 mg/day, the first at the end of surgery and then 1 pill every 12 hours in the surgery day and the first postoperative day; the placebo group (P). All groups received postoperatively the same analgesia protocol when NRS is over 3 with IV Perfalgan and morphine. The effectiveness was evaluated by the time from the initiation of spinal anesthesia until the first analgesic dose, the total amount of morphine administered in the surgery day and the first postoperative day, and the frequency of patients with side effects and necessary amount of adjuvant medication. Results. The baseline demographic characteristics were similar among the 3 groups. In both study days etoricoxib provided an analgesic effect superior to placebo and to ketoprofen, the total administered morphine being significantly lower in etoricoxib group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding the side effects.

1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1121-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT L. BARRACK ◽  
MICHAEL W. WOLFE ◽  
DOUGLAS A. WALDMAN ◽  
MATKO MILICIC ◽  
ALEXANDER J. BERTOT ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Roberts ◽  
T. David Hayes ◽  
Christine T. Tate ◽  
James P. Lesko

1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 592-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fazeela Ferouz ◽  
Mark C. Norris ◽  
Valerie A. Arkoosh ◽  
Barbara L. Leighton ◽  
Louis M. Boxer ◽  
...  

Background Intrathecal sufentanil relieves labor pain but centrally mediated side effects are common. Preventing rostral spread of intrathecal sufentanil should limit these side effects. Both direction of the lateral opening of a pencil-point needle and drug baricity modify the spread of intrathecal local anesthetics. This randomized, prospective, double-blind study examines the effects of these variables on intrathecal sufentanil labor analgesia. Methods Forty laboring, full-term parturients, whose cervixes were dilated less than 5 cm and who requested analgesia for labor were enrolled. Combined spinal epidural analgesia was induced in patients in the sitting position. They were allocated to receive 10 micrograms intrathecal sufentanil diluted with either normal saline or dextrose with the aperture of the pencil-point needle directed cephalad or caudad during drug injection. Thus there were four groups of ten patients: dextrose up, dextrose down, saline up, and saline down. Sufentanil was diluted with normal saline to a concentration of 10 micrograms/ml. The study drug was made by mixing 1 ml sufentanil solution with either 1 ml 10% dextrose or 1 ml normal saline. Visual analog scores for pain, pruritus, nausea, and pain relief were recorded before and 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after drug injection. Results Baricity, but not needle orientation, influenced pain relief and pruritus. Sufentanil in dextrose produced less itching but also less analgesia. Nine of 20 women in the dextrose groups compared with 1 of 20 in the saline groups requested additional analgesia by 30 min. Conclusions Little or no labor analgesia developed for patients receiving sufentanil with dextrose. A supraspinal action may contribute to intrathecal sufentanil's analgesic efficacy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 138-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A. Krenzel ◽  
Chad Cook ◽  
Gavin N. Martin ◽  
Thomas P. Vail ◽  
David E. Attarian ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 800-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lasse Ø Andersen ◽  
Billy B Kristensen ◽  
Henrik Husted ◽  
Kristian S Otte ◽  
Henrik Kehlet

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement 37) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
R. Asbert ◽  
A. Matamala ◽  
J. Asunción ◽  
J. Ortega ◽  
J. Martinez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document