scholarly journals Differences in Healing of a Horizontal Root Fracture as Seen on Conventional Periapical Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ronnachat Rothom ◽  
Patchanee Chuveera

Different locations and healing patterns of horizontal root fractures bear different prognoses. Conventional periapical radiographs have been routinely used for the evaluation of the locations and healing of horizontal root fractures, with the limitation of presenting two-dimensional images. The three-dimensional imaging technology, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), has recently gained interest in dental traumatology, in particular for locating and diagnosing root fractures. However, the assessment of healing patterns of horizontal root fracture using CBCT compared to conventional radiographs has not been established. This case report describes the different healing patterns evaluated by two-dimensional radiographs and CBCT of a horizontally root-fractured maxillary right central incisor treated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with a two-year follow-up. The findings suggest that the healing patterns of horizontal root fractures seen on conventional radiographs and CBCT may be different.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumi Mizuhashi ◽  
Ichiro Ogura ◽  
Yoshihiro Sugawara ◽  
Makoto Oohashi ◽  
Ryo Mizuhashi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
SManoj Kumar ◽  
Hazza Al Hobeira ◽  
MohammadD Aljanakh ◽  
Sameer Shaikh ◽  
Kurian Ponnuse ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Cristina Sales SALINEIRO ◽  
Lucas Rodrigues PINHEIRO ◽  
Oséas dos SANTOS JÚNIOR ◽  
Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso CAVALCANTI

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonny Paul ◽  
Kavita Dube

Endodontic treatments are routinely done with the help of radiographs. However, radiographs represent only a two-dimensional image of an object. Failure to identify aberrant anatomy can lead to endodontic failure. This case report presents the use of three-dimensional imaging with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as an adjunct to digital radiography in identification and management of mandibular second molar with three mesial canals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 449-453
Author(s):  
Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar ◽  
David MacDonald

Detecting vertical root fractures represents an immense challenge for oral health professionals. One of the main tools used to detect this type of biological complication is the periapical radiograph. However, conventional radiography consists of two-dimensional imaging that is limited by the superimposition of bony structures that complicate the detection of root fractures. The alternative, a Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan, cannot be prescribed in every case since radiation should be kept to a minimum as stipulated by the “As Low As Reasonably Achievable” (ALARA) principle. Therefore, to justify the use of a CBCT scan to detect a vertical tooth root fracture, the clinician must prove that it has significant benefits over traditional imaging. Since few systematic reviews have compared CBCT technology to traditional radiography for the diagnosis of vertical root fractures, it is of utmost importance in clinical practice, especially in endodontology and clinical dental medicine, where the available reviews are examined to generate a clinical recommendation. The four hypotheses of this protocol are that (1) CBCT is superior to traditional radiography for detecting vertical root fractures of vital teeth; (2) CBCT is superior to traditional radiography for detecting longitudinal root fractures of vital teeth with radiopaque restorations; (3) CBCT is superior to traditional radiography for detecting vertical root fractures of root-filled teeth without a radiopaque post that may cause artifacts; and (4) CBCT is superior to traditional radiography for detecting vertical root fractures of root-filled teeth with a radiopaque post regardless of its longitude. To test these hypotheses, all the current secondary resources related to the aim of this meta-review are evaluated. If there is sufficient evidence to support clinical decisions, then the appropriate recommendations will be formulated. PROSPERO ID: CRD42018067792


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. e311-e315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassetta Michele ◽  
Altieri Federica ◽  
Di Giorgio Roberto ◽  
Silvestri Alessandro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document