scholarly journals Repositioning of the Severe Prolapsed Silicone Tubes after Bicanalicular Nasal Intubation: A Novel Technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jinjing He ◽  
Jingwen Gong ◽  
Qingqing Zheng ◽  
Jin Jiang

Background. Bicanalicular nasal intubation is widely used in lacrimal drainage system surgery. Its common complication is lateral displacement or spontaneous prolapse. When the distal part of the silicone tubes cannot be seen in the nose endoscopically, either repositioning or removal could be a challenge. We developed a simple technique to reposition the severe prolapsed silicone tubes. Method. This retrospective study included 6 patients with severe prolapsed silicone tubes who had undergone bicanalicular nasal intubation between January 2017 and December 2019. We used a memory wire probe to pull a nylon suture through the lacrimal passage retrograde. Then, the nylon suture was cut into two lines. One line was coiled to the prolapsed tube and tied to another line. This nylon turned into a “lasso” to capture the silicone tube and then lock its knot. By pulling the nylon suture, the severe prolapsed silicone tube was repositioned to the nasal cavity. Results. Using this technique, we successfully repositioned severe prolapsed silicone tubes without any complication in 6 cases. Conclusions. Silicone tube reposition guiding by using a memory wire probe is an optional technique in the treatment of prolapse of silicone tubes, particularly if the distal part of the silicon tube was embedded in the lacrimal sac and cannot be seen in the nose by endoscopy. It is a feasible, minimally invasive, safe, and effective method, avoiding premature tube removal.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Abolfazl Kasaee ◽  
Bahram Eshraghi ◽  
Kambiz Ameli ◽  
Hossein Ghahvehchian ◽  
Mansooreh Jamshidian-Tehrani ◽  
...  

Purpose. To compare the success rate and complications of pulled versus pushed monocanalicular intubation in adults with incomplete lacrimal drainage system obstruction (lacrimal drainage system stenosis). Methods. Patients with lacrimal drainage system stenosis (Munk grade ≥3), including both nasolacrimal duct (NLD) stenosis and common canalicular stenosis, were recruited in this prospective comparative case series. Patients underwent probing and either Monoka (51 eyes) or Masterka (48 eyes) intubation under general or local anesthesia. Tubes were removed 4–14 weeks after the procedure. Six months after tube removal, Munk grades 0 and 1 were defined as a complete success, Munk grade 2 was defined as a partial success, and Munk grade ≥3 was defined as failure. All complications were recorded. Results. Ninety-nine eyes from 89 patients with lacrimal drainage system stenosis who underwent either Monoka (51 eyes) or Masterka (48 eyes) intubation were included. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 55.4 (12) years in the Monoka group and 53.5 (12.9) in the Masterka group. Groups were matched on demographics. Masterka intubation could not be performed in one eye. Complete and partial successes were observed in 52.9% (27/51) and 17.6% (9/51) of eyes in the Monoka group and 42.6% (20/47) and 12.8% (6/47) of eyes in the Masterka group, respectively ( p = 0.29 ). There was a trend toward a higher total success rate in patients with NLD stenosis treated with Monoka 66.7% (26/39) than Masterka 45.5% (15/33) intubation ( p = 0.07 ). This trend also existed in patients with common canalicular stenosis (83.3% (10/12) vs. 76.6% (11/14), p = 0.75 ). Age, sex, bilateral involvement, and duration of intubation did not have a significant impact on the success rate. Early tube loss, slit puncta, and temporary superficial punctate keratopathy were observed complications. Conclusion. Intubation with the pulled monocanalicular silicone tube was associated with a slightly but not significantly higher success rate in adults with lacrimal drainage system stenosis. Patients with NLD stenosis may achieve better results with pulled silicone tubes.


1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Psilas ◽  
V. Eftaxias ◽  
J. Kastanioudakis ◽  
C. Kalogeropoulos

Silicone tubing was used to repair the patency of the nasolacrimal drainage system in 115 patients (four bilaterally) with chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The patients were over 20 years old and 16 were men and 99 women; 46% presented an uncomplicated obstruction with epiphora and 54% presented additional signs of chronic dacryocystitis. We used the technique of Quickert and Dryden with modifications. The silicone tube remained for a mean of 5.5 months (± 2.5 SD). After removal of the tube the follow-up ranged from 6 to 42 months (mean ± SD: 16 ± 9). Patency was maintained in 89% of cases with uncomplicated obstruction and in 69% of those with chronic dacryocystitis (total success rate 78%). We can therefore recommend silicone intubation of the lacrimal drainage system as an alternative to dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), in adults with obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct. In addition, unlike DCR this technique is bloodless and the operation takes less time.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Sun Baek ◽  
Saem Lee ◽  
Jung Hye Lee ◽  
Hye Sun Choi ◽  
Jae Woo Jang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Hyup Kim ◽  
Jung Hye Lee ◽  
Jung Hyun Ahn ◽  
Jung Hoon Kim ◽  
Yoon Duck Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-272
Author(s):  
Ben Limbu ◽  
Benjamin Sim ◽  
Mohan K. Shrestha ◽  
Geoffrey Tabin ◽  
Rohit Saiju

Introduction: Many patients in Nepal travel vast distances to have their surgeries in Kathmandu. They often remain close by until their follow-up visit for their silicone tube removal, which contributes to a large financial burden on them and their families. Hence, reducing the time for which silicone tubes remain in situ following external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) provides significant benefits to patients. Furthermore, this is the first comparative study which has successfully demonstrated the earliest timeframe for which silicone tubes can be removed following DCR in the medical literature. Methods: A randomized controlled trial consisting of 144 patients was designed to compare patient outcomes after early (2 weeks postoperatively) versus standard (6 weeks postoperatively) removal of silicone stents. The success of their procedures was determined when patients were assessed both symptomatically and anatomically at their 6-month follow-up. Results: The surgical success in both groups was high at 97.8% collectively in both groups and there were only a small number of patients who were lost to follow-up (5 patients) at 6 months. There was no statistical difference at removing silicone stents at 2 or 6 weeks postoperatively. Conclusion: These results were consistent with our pilot study, which showed no statistical difference in long-term success following silicone tube removal at 2 and 6 weeks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document