Complications of Pancreatic Surgery and the Role of Perioperative Nutrition

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerio Di Carlo ◽  
Luca Gianotti ◽  
Gianpaolo Balzano ◽  
Alessandro Zerbi ◽  
Marco Braga
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. S49
Author(s):  
C. Benucci ◽  
M. Santilli ◽  
C. Roberto ◽  
E. Casciani ◽  
G. Prezioso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Graziano Pernazza ◽  
Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Keyword(s):  

HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S627
Author(s):  
P. Regi ◽  
M. Ramera ◽  
R. Girelli ◽  
I. Frigerio ◽  
A. Giardino ◽  
...  

10.2741/1962 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 2203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasquale Sperlongano
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Mauri ◽  
Chiara Mattiuz ◽  
Luca Maria Sconfienza ◽  
Vittorio Pedicini ◽  
Dario Poretti ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Benzoni ◽  
Enrico Saccomano ◽  
Aron Zompicchiatti ◽  
Dario Lorenzin ◽  
Umberto Baccarani ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 647-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
René L. van der Hul ◽  
Peter W. Plaisier ◽  
Onno T. Terpstra ◽  
Hajo A. Braining

Author(s):  
Jony van Hilst ◽  
Nine de Graaf ◽  
Mohammad Abu Hilal ◽  
Marc G. Besselink

Abstract Background Pancreatic resections are among the most technically demanding procedures, including a high risk of potentially life-threatening complications and outcomes strongly correlated to hospital volume and individual surgeon experience. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs) have become a part of standard surgical practice worldwide over the last decade; however, in comparison with other surgical procedures, the implementation of minimally invasive approaches into clinical practice has been rather slow. Objective The aim of this study was to highlight and summarize the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of minimally invasive approaches in pancreatic surgery. Methods A WHO trial registry and Pubmed database literature search was performed to identify all RCTs comparing MIPRs (robot-assisted and/or laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy [DP] or pancreatoduodenectomy [PD]) with open pancreatic resections (OPRs). Results Overall, five RCTs on MIPR versus OPR have been published and seven RCTs are currently recruiting. For DP, the results of two RCTs were in favor of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in terms of shorter hospital stay and less intraoperative blood loss, with comparable morbidity and mortality. Regarding PD, two RCTs showed similar advantages for MIPD. However, concerns were raised after the early termination of the third multicenter RCT on MIPD versus open PD due to higher complication-related mortality in the laparoscopic group and no clear other demonstrable advantages. No RCTs on robot-assisted pancreatic procedures are available as yet. Conclusion At the current level of evidence, MIDP is thought to be safe and feasible, although oncological safety should be further evaluated. Based on the results of the RCTs conducted for PD, MIPD cannot be proclaimed as the superior alternative to open PD, although promising outcomes have been demonstrated by experienced centers. Future studies should provide answers to the role of robotic approaches in pancreatic surgery and aim to identity the subgroups of patients or indications with the greatest benefit of MIPRs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document