Dimensions of the Temporal Bone in Small Children in Relation to the Cochlear Implant-An Analysis of CT Scans

Author(s):  
K.F. Mack ◽  
J. M�ller ◽  
J. Helms
1992 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Seicshnaydre ◽  
Michele H. Johnson ◽  
M. Suzanne Hasenstab ◽  
George H. Williams

Preoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) can demonstrate anatomic details relevant to surgical management and is therefore essential in the presurgical evaluation of patients receiving cochlear implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate preoperative CT studies and compare them to surgical findings in 34 children who received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. The focus of this report is to discuss the dependability of CT scans in predicting surgical findings at the time of cochlear implantation. Results indicate that agreement of CT interpretations with surgical findings is partially related to the etiology of hearing loss and the experience of the surgeon and neuroradiologist. Advantages and limitations of the CT scans in predicting surgical findings are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Ewy ◽  
Martin Piazza ◽  
Brian Thorp ◽  
Michael Phillips ◽  
Carolyn Quinsey

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Neves ◽  
E. D. Tran ◽  
I. M. Kessler ◽  
N. H. Blevins

AbstractMiddle- and inner-ear surgery is a vital treatment option in hearing loss, infections, and tumors of the lateral skull base. Segmentation of otologic structures from computed tomography (CT) has many potential applications for improving surgical planning but can be an arduous and time-consuming task. We propose an end-to-end solution for the automated segmentation of temporal bone CT using convolutional neural networks (CNN). Using 150 manually segmented CT scans, a comparison of 3 CNN models (AH-Net, U-Net, ResNet) was conducted to compare Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and speed of segmentation of the inner ear, ossicles, facial nerve and sigmoid sinus. Using AH-Net, the Dice coefficient was 0.91 for the inner ear; 0.85 for the ossicles; 0.75 for the facial nerve; and 0.86 for the sigmoid sinus. The average Hausdorff distance was 0.25, 0.21, 0.24 and 0.45 mm, respectively. Blinded experts assessed the accuracy of both techniques, and there was no statistical difference between the ratings for the two methods (p = 0.93). Objective and subjective assessment confirm good correlation between automated segmentation of otologic structures and manual segmentation performed by a specialist. This end-to-end automated segmentation pipeline can help to advance the systematic application of augmented reality, simulation, and automation in otologic procedures.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Todt ◽  
Rainer O. Seidl ◽  
Arne Ernst

The exchange of an cochlear implant or the re-positioning of an electrode have become more frequently required than a decade ago. The consequences of such procedures at a microstructural level within the cochlea are not known. It was the aim of the present study to further investigate the effects of an CI electrode pull-out. Therefore 10 freshly harvested temporal bones (TB) were histologically evaluated after a cochlear implant electrode pull-out of a perimodiolar electrode. In additional 9 TB the intrascalar movements of the CI electrode while being pulled-out were digitally analysed by video- capturing. Histologically, a disruption of the modiolar wall or the spiral osseous lamina were not observed. In one TB, a basilar membrane lifting up was found, but it could not be undoubtedly attributed to the pull-out of the electrode. When analyzing the temporal sequence of the electrode movement during the pull-out, the electrode turned in one case so that the tip elevates the basilar membrane. The pull- out of perimodiolarly placed CI electrodes does not damage the modiolar wall at a microstructural level and should be guided (e.g., forceps) to prevent a 90 o turning of the electrode tip into the direction of the basilar membrane.


2020 ◽  
Vol 277 (6) ◽  
pp. 1645-1650
Author(s):  
Octavio Garaycochea ◽  
Raquel Manrique-Huarte ◽  
Melisa Vigliano ◽  
Sol Ferrán de la Cierva ◽  
Manuel Manrique

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-318
Author(s):  
Luca Bruschini ◽  
Francesca Forli ◽  
Andrea De Vito ◽  
Stefano Berrettini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document