Cardiac Pacemaker Therapy in Sleep Apnea

Author(s):  
Thomas Schichtl ◽  
Michael Pfeifer
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niek EG Beurskens ◽  
Fleur VY Tjong ◽  
Reinoud E Knops ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

The clinically available leadless pacemakers for patients with a single-chamber pacing indication have shown to be safe and effective. However, the optimal end-of-life strategy of this novel technique is undefined. Suggested strategies comprise of (a) placing an additional leadless device adjacent to the leadless pacemaker, or (b) retrieving the non-functioning leadless pacemaker and subsequently implanting a new device. Although initial studies demonstrate promising results, early experience of acute and mid-term retrieval feasibility and safety remains mixed. We suggest that the approach of leadless pacemaker retrieval is more appealing to limit the amount of non-functioning intracardiac hardware. In addition, potential risks for device–device interference, and unknown long-term complications associated with multiple intracardiac devices are prevented. The potential inability to retrieve chronically implanted leadless pacemakers limits the application of this novel technology. Therefore, long-term prospective analysis is required to define the most optimal end-of-life strategy.


2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 480-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. MARTIJN VAN ECK ◽  
NORBERT M. VAN HEMEL ◽  
JOHANNES. C. KELDER ◽  
ARJAN A. VAN DEN BOS ◽  
WILLIAM TAKS ◽  
...  

Respiration ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Fietze ◽  
Jens Röttig ◽  
Sabine Quispe-Bravo ◽  
Frank Riedel ◽  
Joachim Witte ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. S358.1-S358
Author(s):  
S. Jain ◽  
U. Patel ◽  
A. Gupta ◽  
R. Ailiani ◽  
S. Islam ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Marine ◽  
Thomas C. Crawford ◽  
Sunil K. Sinha ◽  
Behzad B. Pavri ◽  
Sri Sundaram ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (15) ◽  
pp. 1458-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fleur V.Y. Tjong ◽  
Vivek Y. Reddy

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-892
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Napoli ◽  
Linda D. Vallino

Purpose The 2 most commonly used operations to treat velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) are superiorly based pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty, both of which may result in hyponasal speech and airway obstruction. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the bilateral buccal flap revision palatoplasty (BBFRP) as an alternative technique to manage VPI while minimizing these risks and (b) conduct a systematic review of the evidence of BBFRP on speech and other clinical outcomes. A report comparing the speech of a child with hypernasality before and after BBFRP is presented. Method A review of databases was conducted for studies of buccal flaps to treat VPI. Using the principles of a systematic review, the articles were read, and data were abstracted for study characteristics that were developed a priori. With respect to the case report, speech and instrumental data from a child with repaired cleft lip and palate and hypernasal speech were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Eight articles were included in the analysis. The results were positive, and the evidence is in favor of BBFRP in improving velopharyngeal function, while minimizing the risk of hyponasal speech and obstructive sleep apnea. Before surgery, the child's speech was characterized by moderate hypernasality, and after surgery, it was judged to be within normal limits. Conclusion Based on clinical experience and results from the systematic review, there is sufficient evidence that the buccal flap is effective in improving resonance and minimizing obstructive sleep apnea. We recommend BBFRP as another approach in selected patients to manage VPI. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9919352


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document