Adjuvant Effect of Endotoxin on Primary Antibody Formation in Irradiated Rats

Pathobiology ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-312
Author(s):  
E. Elekes ◽  
K. Merétey ◽  
V. Várterész
1981 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Nelson M. Vaz ◽  
Robert E. Kane ◽  
James M. Lynch

Linear relationships were found between the dose of A1(OH)3 adjuvant and the titer of anti-OVA antibodies formed by BDF1 mice. Mice immunized with OVA, DNP-KLH and then boosted with DNP-OVA formed anti-DNP antibodies only when A1(OH)3 was added to the injection of DNP-KLH; addition of A1(OH)3 to the priming injection of OVA decreased, rather than increased antibody formation.


1961 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Friedman ◽  
Charles E. Buckler ◽  
Samuel Baron

1. In guinea pigs, aminomethylpteroylglutamic acid (methotrexate) is capable of blocking the development of delayed skin hypersensitivity, the primary antibody response, and the specific febrile response to ovalbumin and diphtheria toxoid. The primary antibody response is more easily inhibited than is the development of delayed skin hypersensitivity. 2. The effect of methotrexate on immunologic responses depended upon the dose of methotrexate employed and the strength of the antigenic stimulus.


1962 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Farthing ◽  
L. B. Holt

The characteristics of Gram-negative organisms and some of the underlying reasons for their adjuvant action with diphtheria toxoid are described.The adjuvant effect was shown by an earlier production of antitoxin, with a maintained differential advantage over controls, but with the usual decline in titre with passage of time. The adjuvant effect only occurred with a primary stimulus. There was no adsorption between toxoid and vaccine and mixture of the two was not necessary, but the vaccine had to be given simultaneously with or within 24 hr. following injection of the toxoid. There was evidence for believing that these adjuvants decreased the minimal stimulating dose of antigen and caused hyperplasia of antibody-producing cells. No direct link could be found between the characteristic stress symptoms caused by lipopolysaccharides and their ability to enhance antibody formation.


1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
John O. Naim ◽  
Raymond J. Lanzafame ◽  
Carel J. van Oss

1964 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Rowley ◽  
Frank W. Fitch

Passive immunization of rats with homologous anti-sheep erythrocyte serum markedly inhibited the primary antibody response to various doses of sheep erythrocytes. Inhibition was "specific" and apparently produced by either "19S" or "7S" antibody to the antigen. Passive immunization inhibited splenic hyperplasia associated with the primary antibody response. Passive immunization 24 hours after active immunization effectively inhibited the primary antibody response. The markedly suppressive effect of specific antibody on the primary antibody response contrasted sharply with the absence of this effect on the secondary response. Antigen-antibody complexes formed in vitro elicited no measurable primary antibody response but did elicit a high secondary response. Exposure of normal spleen cells to the antibody in vivo or in vitro suppressed their response to the antigen in x-irradiated recipients. In contrast, cells from previously immunized animals transferred to x-irradiated animals produced antibody in the presence of passively given antibody. Thus, "potential antibody-forming cells" from normal animals were unresponsive to the antigen in the presence of specific antibody, while "antibody-forming cells" from previously immunized animals responded to the antigen in the presence of antibody. Presumably, antibody actively produced in small quantities by a few antibody-forming cells might inhibit antibody formation by potential antibody-forming cells. Confirmation of this suggestion was obtained by showing that some animals initially injected with small doses of antigen failed to produce measurable antibody to subsequent injections of larger doses of the antigen. Low doses of antigen capable of inducing unresponsiveness produced no measurable circulating antibody, but these doses did produce increased numbers of plaque-forming (antibody-releasing) cells in spleens of rats. Thus, the formation of specific antibody may provide a homeostatic or "feed-back" mechanism which controls or limits production of specific antibody to the portion of the antibody-forming system previously stimulated by the antigen. This mechanism may account in part for immunological unresponsiveness produced in certain other related experimental systems.


2004 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soren Thor Larsen ◽  
Rikke Hansen ◽  
Otto Melchior Poulsen ◽  
Gunnar Damgard Nielsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document