Acute Kidney Injury after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 372-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Wisit Cheungpasitporn ◽  
Narat Srivali ◽  
Patompong Ungprasert ◽  
Wonngarm Kittanamongkolchai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Background: The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov from inception through October, 2014. Studies that reported relative risks, ORs, or hazard ratios comparing the AKI risk in patients who underwent TAVR versus those who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement were included. We performed the pre-specified sensitivity analysis including only propensity score-based studies. Mortality risk was evaluated among the studies that reported AKI outcome. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. Results: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1,852 patients and 14 cohort studies with 3,113 patients were analyzed to assess the AKI risk in patients undergoing TAVR. The pooled RRs of AKI in patients undergoing TAVR were 0.65 (95% CI 0.36-1.15, I2 = 75%) in the analysis of RCTs and propensity score-based studies and 0.76 (95% CI 0.44-1.34, I2 = 79%) in the analysis of observational studies. Sensitivity analysis in RCTs and propensity score-based studies using a standard AKI definition demonstrated a significant association between TAVR and lower AKI risk (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.25-0.50, I2 = 0%). Our meta-analyses of RCTs and propensity score-based studies did not find associations between TAVR and reduced risks of severe AKI requiring dialysis (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.38-1.79, I2 = 63%). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrates an association between TAVR and lower AKI risk.

scholarly journals Association of frailty status with acute kidney injury and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. e0177157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Wisit Cheungpasitporn ◽  
Natanong Thamcharoen ◽  
Patompong Ungprasert ◽  
Wonngarm Kittanamongkolchai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Frailty Status ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

scholarly journals Minimally invasive surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001535
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sayed ◽  
Salma Almotawally ◽  
Karim Wilson ◽  
Malak Munir ◽  
Ahmed Bendary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Paravalvular Leakage ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has recently been approved for use in patients who are at intermediate and low surgical risk. Moreover, recent years have witnessed a renewed interest in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (miAVR). The present meta-analysis compared the outcomes of TAVR and miAVR in the management of aortic stenosis (AS). We conducted an electronic search across six databases from 2002 (TAVR inception) to December 2019. Data from relevant studies regarding the clinical and length of hospitalisation outcomes were extracted and analysed using R software. We identified a total of 11 cohort studies, of which seven were matched/propensity matched. Our analysis demonstrated higher rates of midterm mortality (≥1 year) with TAVR (risk ratio (RR): 1.93, 95% CI: 1.16 to 3.22), but no significant differences with respect to 1 month mortality (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.81), stroke (RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.40 to 2.87) and bleeding (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.56 to 3.75) rates. Patients undergoing TAVR were more likely to experience paravalvular leakage (RR: 14.89, 95% CI: 6.89 to 32.16), yet less likely to suffer acute kidney injury (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.69) compared with miAVR. The duration of hospitalisation was significantly longer in the miAVR group (mean difference: 1.92 (0.61 to 3.24)). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment revealed ≤moderate quality of evidence in all outcomes. TAVR was associated with lower acute kidney injury rate and shorter length of hospitalisation, yet higher risks of midterm mortality and paravalvular leakage. Given the increasing adoption of both techniques, there is an urgent need for head-to-head randomised trials with adequate follow-up periods.

scholarly journals Early Adverse Impact of Transfusion After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Zimarino ◽  
Marco Barbanti ◽  
George D. Dangas ◽  
Luca Testa ◽  
Davide Capodanno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Rbc Transfusion

Background: There is no consensus on the benefit of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Methods: The multicenter Transfusion Requirements in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TRITAVI) registry retrospectively included patients after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement; propensity score-matching identified pairs of patients with and without RBC transfusion. The primary end point was 30-day mortality; nonfatal myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and stage 2 to 3 acute kidney injury at 30 days were secondary end points. We repeated propensity score-matching according to the hemoglobin nadir, hemoglobin drop, and in the subgroup of uncomplicated patients, without major vascular complications or major bleeding. Results: Among 2587 patients, RBC transfusion was administered in 421 cases (16%). The primary end point occurred in 104 (4.0%) patients, myocardial infarction in 9 (0.4%), cerebrovascular accident in 38 (1.5%), and acute kidney injury in 125 (4.8%) cases. In the 842 propensity-matched patients, RBC transfusion was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.06–4.05]; P =0.034) and acute kidney injury (hazard ratio, 4.35 [95% CI, 2.21–8.55]; P <0.001). Interaction testing between RBC transfusion and mortality was not statistically significant in the above-mentioned subgroups, and such association was not documented in the corresponding propensity score-matched cohorts. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model, major vascular complications ( P =0.044), major bleeding ( P =0.041), and RBC transfusion ( P =0.048) were independent correlates of 30-day mortality. Conclusions: RBC transfusion correlates with increased mortality and acute kidney injury early after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality, irrespective of periprocedural major bleeding and vascular complications. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03740425.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document