Abstract 13607: Differential Response of Local Coagulation after Implantation of New Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Compared with Sirolimus-Eluting Stent

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Yamaguchi ◽  
Tetsuzo Wakatsuki ◽  
Akira Takashima ◽  
Mika Bando ◽  
Sachiko Bando ◽  
...  

Purpose: We have previously demonstrated local persistent hypercoagulation after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation by measuring plasma prothrombin fragment F1+2(frF1+2) levels. The aim of this study is to examine local coagulation response after biolimus-eluting stent (BES) and everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation. Methods: Sixty-eight patients who were treated with stents about eight months earlier to the mid-segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery, with no evidence of restenosis, were studied (BES: 12pts, EES: 15pts, SES: 23pts, and BMS: 18pts). We measured plasma levels of frF1+2 sampled in coronary sinus (CS) and sinus of Valsalva (V). The transcardiac frF1+2 gradients (ΔfrF1+2) were defined as CS level minus V level. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to total stent length [longer stent group (≥24mm) or shorter stent group (<24mm)]. Results: A larger percent diameter stenosis was observed in the BMS group than in the SES, EES, and BES groups (25.1±15.6 vs 7.1±16.5, 12.5±12.8, 10.3±14.2%, p<0.05, respectively). The ΔfrF1+2 was greater in the SES group than in the BMS, EES, and BES groups, and no significant differences were observed among the BMS, EES, and BES groups (23.4±21.1 vs 4.7±13.4, 3.2±11.7, 1.5±11.1 pmol/l, p<0.05, respectively). The ΔfrF1+2 in longer stent group (n=11) was significantly greater than in shorter stent group (n=12) (27.4±12.1 vs 19.2±10.1 pmol/l, p<0.05) only in the SES group, however, no significant differences were observed according to total stent length in other groups. Conclusions: A lower response of local coagulation after BES and EES implantation was shown, and significant correlation between local hypercoagulation and total stent length was observed only after SES implantation. These findings might be associated with lower strut thickness and unique characteristics of polymer in second-generation drug-eluting stents.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Yamaguchi ◽  
T Wakatsuki ◽  
R Ueno ◽  
Y Kawabata ◽  
T Matsuura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We have previously reported local persistent hypercoagulation after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation by measuring local plasma prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) levels. The aim of this study is to examine chronic local coagulative response after each generation- drug eluting stent (DES) implantation. Methods Ninety-five patients who were treated about eight months earlier with coronary angioplasty, with no evidence of restenosis, were studied [1stgeneration durable polymer (DP)-DES {SES; Cypher®: 26pts, paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES); Taxus®:16pts}, 2ndgeneration DP-DES {everolimus-eluting stent (EES); Xience®:15pts, zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES); Endeavor®:15pts}, and 3rdgeneration biodegradable polymer (BP)-DES {BP-biolimus-eluting stent (BES); Nobori®: 11pts and BP-SES; Ultimaster®: 12pts}]. We measured plasma levels of F1+2 sampled in coronary sinus (CS) and sinus of Valsalva (V). The transcardiac gradient (Δ) was defined as CS level minus V level. Results No significant differences were observed in the percent diameter stenosis among 1st, 2nd, and 3rd DES groups (12.5±15.5 vs 16.1±12.9 vs 13.1±11.9%). The ΔF1+2 was significantly lower in the 2nd and 3rd DES groups than in the 1st DES group (9.0±15.4 and 10.0±17.4 vs 27.3±23.8pmol/l, p<0.05, respectively). The ΔF1+2 was significantly lower in the BP-DES groups (BP-BES and BP-SES) than in the DP-DES groups (DP-SES, DP-PES, DP-ZES, and DP-EES) (10.0±17.4 vs 18.1±19.5pmol/l, p<0.05). The ΔF1+2 was significantly lower in the thin strut-DES groups (BP-SES, DP-ZES, and DP-EES) than in the thick strut-DES groups (DP-SES, DP-PES, and BP-BES) (8.4±15.4 vs 21.7±18.5pmol/l, p<0.05). In the BP-DES groups, the ΔF1+2 was lower in the BP-SES group than in the BP-BES group (8.0±16.1 vs 12.7±18.1pmol/l, p=0.08). Conclusions The improvement of chronic local coagulative response was observed according to the progress of DES. These findings might be associated with lower strut thickness and faster polymer resorption in the newer-generation DES.


2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. E317-E326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Venetsanos ◽  
Sofia Sederholm Lawesson ◽  
Georgios Panayi ◽  
Tim Tödt ◽  
Ulf Berglund ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 911-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasileios F Panoulas ◽  
Charles J Ilsley ◽  
Konstantinos Kalogeras ◽  
Habib Khan ◽  
Maria Monteagudo Vela ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES The intermediate-term all-cause mortality rate of real-world patients with multivessel disease (MVD) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-generation drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unknown. We sought to compare the intermediate-term all-cause mortality rates of real-world patients with MVD including left main stem disease, treated with CABG or PCI. METHODS All consecutive all-comer patients with MVD undergoing CABG or PCI with second/third generation drug-eluting stents from 2007 to 2015 in Harefield Hospital, UK were included in this study. The revascularization modality was based on heart team discussions. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Mean follow-up of the study was 3.3 years. Cox regression analysis and propensity matching were used. RESULTS Of 6383 patients with MVD, 4230 underwent CABG, whereas 2153 had PCI with new-generation stents. In the CABG group, the mean age was 66.4 ± 10 years, whereas in the PCI group it was 65.3 ± 12.1 years (P < 0.001). Fewer female patients with MVD were treated with CABG than were treated with PCI (18.5% vs 20.5%; P = 0.026). There was a higher 5-year estimated survival rate among patients having CABG (88% vs 78.3%; Plog-rank < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PCI over CABG was 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41–2.16; P < 0.001]. A total of 653 patients having CABG and 653 having PCI were included in the propensity-matched groups. At mean follow-up, PCI was associated with a higher adjusted HR for all-cause mortality (2.18, 95% CI 1.54–3.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary cohort of real-world patients with MVD, CABG was associated with increased intermediate-term survival compared to PCI with new-generation drug-eluting stents.


2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (13) ◽  
pp. E219
Author(s):  
Hiranuma Noritoshi ◽  
Toshiro Shinke ◽  
Gaku Nakazawa ◽  
Hiromasa Otake ◽  
Matsumoto Daisuke ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Toyota ◽  
T Morimoto ◽  
T Kitai ◽  
M Park ◽  
Y Sasaki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) has been developed to overcome the potential drawbacks of the first-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES). However, it is still under debate whether BP-DES is associated with superior efficacy and safety over DP-DES. Purpose We sought to compare the effects of BP-DES and DP-DES in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods We performed systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing BP-DES and DP-DES on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease using CE-mark approved drug-eluting stents (DES) with at least 1-year follow-up. We included 32 studies involving 39,686 patients (BP-DES: 21,439 patients, and DP-DES: 18,247 patients). Primary outcome measure was target vessel failure (TVF; equivalent to the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization). We performed subgroup analysis according to the DP-DES generations (newer-generation DP-DES: 15,179patients, and first-generation DP-DES: 3,068 patients), and the effects of newer-generation DP-DES was compared with the BP-DES according to the BP-DES strut thickness (Ultra-thin strut [&lt;80μm]: 7,572 patients, Thin-strut [80–100μm]: 5,465 patients, and Thick-strut [≥80μm]: 5,876 patients). Results The odds for TVF was not significantly different between the BP-DES group and the DP-DES group in the entire study population (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.90–1.02], P=0.20). The odds for TVF was significantly low in the BP-DES group relative to the first-generation DP-DES group, however the odds were comparable between the BP-DES group and the newer-generation DP-DES group (BP-DES versus first-generation DP-DES: OR 0.82, 95% CI [0.73–0.92], P&lt;0.001, and BP-DES versus newer-generation DP-DES: OR 1.00, 95% CI [0.93–1.08], P=0.99). We also found no significant differences between the BP-DES and newer-generation DP-DES, in all subgroups stratified by the BP-DES strut thickness (Ultra-thin strut BP-DES versus newer-generation DP-DES: OR 0.88, 95% CI [0.76–1.02], P=0.10, Thin-strut BP-DES versus newer-generation DP-DES: OR 1.01, 95% CI [0.90–1.13], P=0.89, and Thick strut BP-DES versus newer-generation DP-DES: OR 1.11, 95% CI [0.99–1.25], P=0.08). Conclusions In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating clinical outcomes, there was no significant differences between BP-DES and DP-DES. We found beneficial effects of BP-DES relative to the first-generation DP-DES, however, there was no statistical differences between BP-DES and newer-generation DP-DES, irrespective of the BP-DES strut thickness. Pooled odds ratios for clinical outcomes Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document