Discordance Between Coronary Flow Reserve and the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Post-Revascularization for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Author(s):  
Klio Konstantinou ◽  
Thomas R. Keeble ◽  
John R. Davies ◽  
Reto A. Gamma ◽  
Kare H. Tang ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 86 ◽  
Author(s):  
John-Ross D. Clarke ◽  
Randol Kennedy ◽  
Freddy Duarte Lau ◽  
Gilead I. Lancaster ◽  
Stuart W. Zarich

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most common causes of death in both the developed and developing world. It has high associated morbidity despite prompt institution of recommended therapy. The focus over the last few decades in ST-segment elevation AMI has been on timely reperfusion of the epicardial vessel. However, microvascular consequences after reperfusion, such as microvascular obstruction (MVO), are equally reliable predictors of outcome. The attention on the microcirculation has meant that traditional angiographic/anatomic methods are insufficient. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane database for English-language studies published between January 2000 and November 2019 that investigated the use of invasive physiologic tools in AMI. Based on these results, we provide a comprehensive review regarding the role for the invasive evaluation of the microcirculation in AMI, with specific emphasis on coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document