Author(s):  
Boon Kristen

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected the long-held assumption that international organizations are entitled to absolute immunity under the domestic International Organizations Immunities Act (‘IOIA’). The legal question raised by this case is: does the language of the IOIA allow for the incorporation of subsequent changes to sovereign state immunity thereby conferring a restrictive, not absolute, immunity upon international organizations? The court applied the same concept of restrictive immunity to international organizations as has been developed and applied to sovereign states. This case has important implications for the evolution of immunities of international organizations over time.


Author(s):  
Rubins Noah ◽  
Papanastasiou Thomas-Nektarios ◽  
Kinsella N Stephan

This chapter covers the general background international law pertaining to State responsibility, in particular State responsibility incurred in relation to foreign investment, as well as the general nature and types of remedies available to investors when a State expropriates an investor’s property or interferes with its investment. The chapter first provides a short overview of the nature and sources of customary international law. It then discusses whether international law permits a sovereign State to bind itself to a contract with a national of another State. The chapter then deals with State responsibility for acts considered illegal under international law. The chapter summarizes the remedies generally available to the investor or its home State following the taking of the investor's property. Finally, it discusses host State immunity from the jurisdiction of the national courts of other States in connection with investment claims.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document