Criminal Jurisdiction

2021 ◽  
pp. 104-138
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktoriia Sysoieva ◽  
Natalia Semchuk

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aury Lopes Jr. (PUC/RS) ◽  
Ruiz Ritter (PUC/RS)

O trabalho analisa a figura do juiz das garantias na perspectiva de inserção no siste-ma jurídico brasileiro na Reforma do Código de Processo Penal. Pretende demons-trar a incompatibilidade entre a figura do juiz prevento e a imparcialidade jurisdicio-nal, a partir da jurisprudência do Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos e também da Teoria da Dissonância Cognitiva, comprovando a imprescindibilidade do juiz das garantias.


Author(s):  
Rudi Fortson

This chapter examines the legal and practical issues encountered by practitioners when dealing with unfitness to plead litigation. As the Law Commission for England and Wales has pointed out, defendants charged with a criminal offence may be unfit to plead or to stand trial for a variety of reasons, including difficulties resulting from mental illness, learning disability, developmental disorder, or communication impairment. Two issues are considered: (i) how might those defendants who are unfit be accurately identified; and (ii) what steps should be taken by legal practitioners and by the courts of criminal jurisdiction to cater for the interests of vulnerable defendants, victims, and society, and to maintain the integrity of the legal process as one that is fair and just? The chapter evaluates the reform proposals of the English Law Commission and assesses how the law could be improved for all those who are involved in dealing with the unfit to plead.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document