Notes on Early Land Plants Today. 36. Generic treatment of Lophocoleaceae (Marchantiophyta)

Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
LARS SÖDERSTRÖM ◽  
BARBARA CRANDALL-STOTLER ◽  
RAYMOND E. STOTLER ◽  
JIŘÍ VÁŇA ◽  
ANDERS HAGBORG ◽  
...  

Recent molecular phylogenetic studies on Lophocoleaceae have recovered some well-supported monophyletic lineages within Chiloscyphus s. lat. that merit recognition at the generic level. As a consequence, Chiloscyphus is herein circumscribed to include only Chiloscyphus subgen. Chiloscyphus, Chiloscyphus subgen. Connati is elevated to generic rank to which the new name Cryptolophocolea is applied, and Lophocolea, Pachyglossa and Clasmatocolea are recognized as distinct genera. Tetracymbaliella is transferred to the Brevianthaceae, and a synopsis of the genera currently recognized in Lophocoleaceae is provided.

Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
ENDYMION D. COOPER ◽  
LARS SÖDERSTRÖM ◽  
ANDERS HAGBORG ◽  
MATT VON KONRAT

  Cooper (2013) summarizes the current status of the family Lepidoziaceae and presents a new classification based on recent phylogenetic studies (Cooper et al. 2011, 2012). The classification requires many transfers of taxa and the new combinations and a new synonym are reported here. Ceramanus gen. nov. is newly described and Tricholepidozia comb. et stat. nov. elevated to generic rank. Several of the species require lectotypification, but this is beyond the scope of this nomenclatural note and lectotypes are designated only in two unambiguous cases.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 167 (2) ◽  
pp. 218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Endymion D. Cooper ◽  
Lars Söderström ◽  
Anders Hagborg ◽  
Matt Von Konrat

When Cooper et al. (2013) reorganized species among genera in Lepidoziaceae Limpricht (1876: 310), one taxon, Lepidozia leratii Stephani (1922: 333), was mistakenly combined under Neolepidozia Fulford & Taylor (1959: 81). The transfer was not based on any morphological or molecular evidence placing it in Neolepidozia. On the contrary, molecular phylogenetic studies (Cooper et al., 2011, 2012; Heslewood & Brown, 2007) all place Lepidozia leratii in close proximity of Tricholepidozia pulcherrima (Stephani 1909: 600) E.D.Cooper in Cooper et al. (2013: 60) the type of Tricholepidozia (Schuster 1963: 256) E.D.Cooper in Cooper et al. (2013: 58). This error is corrected here.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
LARS SÖDERSTRÖM ◽  
ANDERS HAGBORG ◽  
MATT VON KONRAT
Keyword(s):  
New Name ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 741 ◽  
pp. 1-168
Author(s):  
Sergey A. Belokobylskij ◽  
Alejandro Zaldívar-Riverón

The classification of the genera belonging to the doryctine tribe Rhaconotini (Braconidae) is updated. The following new taxa are described: Troporhaconotus gen. nov. (with 12 species), Afroipodoryctes subgen. nov. (of Ipodoryctes Granger, 1949) (with three species), Hexarhaconotinus subgen. nov. (of Rhaconotinus Hedqvist, 1965) (with ten species), Bathycentor zimbabwensis sp. nov., Ipodoryctes (Afroipodoryctes) reunionus sp. nov., I. (A.) saintphilippensis sp. nov., Platyspathius (Platyspathius) venezuelicus sp. nov., P. (P.) ranomafanus sp. nov., Rhacontsira haeselbarthi sp. nov., Rh. mozambiquensis sp. nov., Rh. saigonensis sp. nov. and Rh. toamasina sp. nov. The generic status of Euryphrymnus Cameron, 1910 is resurrected. The generic name Aptenobracon Marsh, 1965 is synonymised under Rhaconotus Ruthe, 1854 (syn. nov.); Rhaconotus asiaticus Belokobylskij, 1990 is synonymised under Rh. kerzhneri Belokobylskij, 1985 (syn. nov.). The new name, Rhaconotinus austrochinensis nom. nov., is suggested for the preoccupied name Rhaconotus chinensis Chen & Shi, 2004 (December) not Rhaconotus chinensis Belokobylskij & Chen, 2004 (June). New species contents, in many cases with numerous new combinations, are suggested for the genera Bathycentor Saussure, 1892, Euryphrymnus Cameron, 1910, Ipodoryctes Granger, 1949, Rhaconotinus Hedqvist, 1965 and Rhaconotus. The tribe Leptorhaconotini is synonymised with Rhaconotini based on previously published molecular phylogenetic studies, though we leave this group within the subtribe Leptorhaconotina.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
RUI-LIANG ZHU ◽  
YU-MEI WEI ◽  
LARS SÖDERSTRÖM ◽  
ANDERS HAGBORG ◽  
MATT VON KONRAT
Keyword(s):  
New Name ◽  

Phytotaxa ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
D. CHRISTINE CARGILL ◽  
LARS SÖDERSTRÖM ◽  
ANDERS HAGBORG ◽  
MATT VON KONRAT
Keyword(s):  
New Name ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 419-424
Author(s):  
George Sangster ◽  
Guy M. Kirwan ◽  
Jérôme Fuchs ◽  
Edward C. Dickinson ◽  
Andy Elliott ◽  
...  

Abstract Multiple molecular phylogenetic studies have demonstrated that two Neotropical raptors, tiny hawk Accipiter superciliosus and its sister species semicollared hawk A. collaris, are not closely related to core Accipiter, and that A. superciliosus, at least, possesses osteological characters not replicated in the remainder of the genus. Based on these data, there is a need to recognise their distinctiveness at generic level. However, as recently noted in two global bird checklists, no name is available to accommodate them, so we provide a new nomen here. Furthermore, two Asian accipitrids, crested goshawk A. trivirgatus and its presumed closest relative Sulawesi goshawk A. griseiceps, are also phylogenetically distinctive; in this case the genus-group name Lophospiza is applicable. We also designate type species for two genus-group names (Hieraspiza and Eusparvius) currently in the synonymy of Accipiter, and, as an aid to future workers, we provide a synonymy of the genus Accipiter and a list of species currently included in Accipiter for which published molecular phylogenetic data are apparently lacking.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 394 (1) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
L. RASINGAM ◽  
K. KARTHIGEYAN

The genus Elatostema J. R. Forst. & G. Forst. belongs to the tribe Elatostemateae Gaudich. (1830: 493) of the family Urticaceae. It is one of the largest genera in the family with c. 626 accepted names and mostly distributed from tropical to subtropical regions of Africa, Asia and Oceania (Tseng & Hu, 2015; Lin et al. 2018; Fu et al. 2019). Recently, Tseng et al. (2019) provided a new circumscription for the Elatostema S.l. based on the molecular phylogenetic studies and morphological characters. Perry (1951), while studying the New Guinean flora, described Elatostema humile L. M. Perry (1951: 378) from the Idenburg river of New Guinea. This is a later homonym of the Fijian species Elatostema humile A.C. Sm. (1942: 22) and so illegitimate according to article 53.1 of ICN (Turland et al. 2018). Therefore, a replacement name, Elatostema perryi is proposed here.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jíri Váňa ◽  
Lars Söderström ◽  
Anders Hagborg ◽  
Matt Von Konrat

Váňa et al. (2013) elevated Anastrophyllum subgen. Schizophyllum (Schuster 1969: 739) to generic rank as Schizophyllum (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. (2013: 16), overlooking the genus Schizophyllum Nuttall (1841: 452; Asteraceae) and, thereby creating an illegitimate later homonym. This is corrected here by publication of the new genus Schizophyllopsis and the transfer of all species of Schizophyllum (R.M.Schust.) Váňa et al. to that genus. Despite the generic name itself being illegitimate, names published under Schizophyllum (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. are legitimate under ICN Art. 55.1 (see below). 


Author(s):  
D. G. Melnikov ◽  
L. I. Krupkina

Based on the published data of molecular phylogenetic studies of the tribe Cariceae Dumort. genera (Cyperaceae), obtained by an international collaboration (The Global Carex Group, 2016; et al.), and morphological characters of the genera (Kukkonen, 1990; and others), new nomenclatural combinations and replacement names in the genus Carex L. are published for 11 species, one subspecies and two sections previously included in the genus Kobresia Willd.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document