scholarly journals Notes on Early Land Plants Today. 45. A correction

Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jíri Váňa ◽  
Lars Söderström ◽  
Anders Hagborg ◽  
Matt Von Konrat

Váňa et al. (2013) elevated Anastrophyllum subgen. Schizophyllum (Schuster 1969: 739) to generic rank as Schizophyllum (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. (2013: 16), overlooking the genus Schizophyllum Nuttall (1841: 452; Asteraceae) and, thereby creating an illegitimate later homonym. This is corrected here by publication of the new genus Schizophyllopsis and the transfer of all species of Schizophyllum (R.M.Schust.) Váňa et al. to that genus. Despite the generic name itself being illegitimate, names published under Schizophyllum (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. are legitimate under ICN Art. 55.1 (see below). 

2022 ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Fearghus R. McSweeney ◽  
Jeff Shimeta ◽  
John St J.S. Buckeridge

This paper records a new genus Taungurungia, which is the first new taxon with emergences to be described from the Lower Devonian of Victoria. The fossil is preserved primarily as a compression and impression, and lacks internal anatomy. The fossil extends our knowledge of known variations within early land plants, with most characteristics, such as emergences and H- or K-branching, redolent of affinities with the zosterophylls. However, having a large ovate terminal sporangium, the fossil adds to taxa that in some cases have been provisonally allied to the zosterophylls with elongate sporangia; this further demonstrates the need for reassessment of the Zosterophyllopsida.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
LARS SÖDERSTRÖM ◽  
BARBARA CRANDALL-STOTLER ◽  
RAYMOND E. STOTLER ◽  
JIŘÍ VÁŇA ◽  
ANDERS HAGBORG ◽  
...  

Recent molecular phylogenetic studies on Lophocoleaceae have recovered some well-supported monophyletic lineages within Chiloscyphus s. lat. that merit recognition at the generic level. As a consequence, Chiloscyphus is herein circumscribed to include only Chiloscyphus subgen. Chiloscyphus, Chiloscyphus subgen. Connati is elevated to generic rank to which the new name Cryptolophocolea is applied, and Lophocolea, Pachyglossa and Clasmatocolea are recognized as distinct genera. Tetracymbaliella is transferred to the Brevianthaceae, and a synopsis of the genera currently recognized in Lophocoleaceae is provided.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDERS HAGBORG ◽  
LARS SÖDERSTRÖM ◽  
MATT VON KONRAT

 Schuster (1978) described Marsupella xenophylla together with his new subgenus Nanomarsupella stating they were valid as generico-specific descriptions (ICN Art. 38.5; McNeill et al. 2012). However, as it was not described with a new genus but instead with new subgenus it is not validly described. However, the species is regarded as validly described here. Schuster (1996) then intended to elevate the subgenus to a genus but as the proposed basionym is not valid and no description was provided, his new genus is invalid as well as his proposed new combination of type species.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
ENDYMION D. COOPER ◽  
LARS SÖDERSTRÖM ◽  
ANDERS HAGBORG ◽  
MATT VON KONRAT

  Cooper (2013) summarizes the current status of the family Lepidoziaceae and presents a new classification based on recent phylogenetic studies (Cooper et al. 2011, 2012). The classification requires many transfers of taxa and the new combinations and a new synonym are reported here. Ceramanus gen. nov. is newly described and Tricholepidozia comb. et stat. nov. elevated to generic rank. Several of the species require lectotypification, but this is beyond the scope of this nomenclatural note and lectotypes are designated only in two unambiguous cases.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
ENDYMION D. COOPER

 Recent molecular phylogenies of the Lepidoziaceae indicate that the current classification is incongruent with the phylogeny. Although substantial uncertainties remain, an interim classification is needed. The classification proposed includes a broader definition of the Lembidioideae, reinstatement of Neolepidozia and Tricholepidozia and the recognition of the new genus Ceramanus. While the Zoopsidoideae are unlikely to represent a monophyletic group, it is not yet possible to provide a phylogenetically accurate revision of this subfamily.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Datu Adiatma ◽  
◽  
Matthew R. Saltzman ◽  
Seth A. Young ◽  
Elizabeth M. Griffith ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 372 (6544) ◽  
pp. 803.18-805
Author(s):  
Pamela J. Hines

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document