Minimally Invasive Versus Open TLIF in the Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND It remains unclear if minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is comparable to traditional, open TLIF because of the limitations of the prior small-sample-size, single-center studies reporting comparative effectiveness. OBJECTIVE To compare MI-TLIF to traditional, open TLIF for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in the largest study to date by sample size. METHODS We utilized the prospective Quality Outcomes Database registry and queried patients with grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent single-segment surgery with MI- or open TLIF methods. Outcomes were compared 24 mo postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 297 patients were included: 72 (24.2%) MI-TLIF and 225 (75.8%) open TLIF. MI-TLIF surgeries had lower mean body mass indexes (29.5 ± 5.1 vs 31.3 ± 7.0, P = .0497) and more worker's compensation cases (11.1% vs 1.3%, P < .001) but were otherwise similar. MI-TLIF had less blood loss (108.8 ± 85.6 vs 299.6 ± 242.2 mL, P < .001), longer operations (228.2 ± 111.5 vs 189.6 ± 66.5 min, P < .001), and a higher return-to-work (RTW) rate (100% vs 80%, P = .02). Both cohorts improved significantly from baseline for 24-mo Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale back pain (NRS-BP), NRS leg pain (NRS-LP), and Euro-Qol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) (P > .001). In multivariable adjusted analyses, MI-TLIF was associated with lower ODI (β = −4.7; 95% CI = −9.3 to −0.04; P = .048), higher EQ-5D (β = 0.06; 95% CI = 0.01-0.11; P = .02), and higher satisfaction (odds ratio for North American Spine Society [NASS] 1/2 = 3.9; 95% CI = 1.4-14.3; P = .02). Though trends favoring MI-TLIF were evident for NRS-BP (P = .06), NRS-LP (P = .07), and reoperation rate (P = .13), these results did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION For single-level grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, MI-TLIF was associated with less disability, higher quality of life, and higher patient satisfaction compared with traditional, open TLIF. MI-TLIF was associated with higher rates of RTW, less blood loss, but longer operative times. Though we utilized multivariable adjusted analyses, these findings may be susceptible to selection bias.

Download Full-text

Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyz310_339 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Andrew Kai-Hong Chan ◽

Erica F Bisson ◽

Mohamad Bydon ◽

Steven D Glassman ◽

Kevin T Foley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽

Back Pain ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Invasive Surgery ◽

Rating Scale ◽

College Education ◽

Leg Pain ◽

Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Abstract INTRODUCTION The factors driving the best outcomes following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) are not clearly elucidated. This study investigates the factors that drive the best patient reported outcomes (PRO) following MIS for DLS. METHODS A total of 608 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Registry underwent surgery for grade 1 DLS of whom 259 underwent surgery with MIS techniques [187 fusions (72.2%)]. Surgeries were classified as MIS if any of the following were involved: MIS laminectomy, MIS pedicle screws, MIS interbody grafts, or percutaneous screws. Outcomes were assessed at 24 mo postoperatively. PROs included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric rating scale (NRS) Back Pain, NRS Leg Pain, EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) Questionnaire, and North American Spine Society (NASS) Satisfaction Questionnaire. Multivariate models were constructed adjusting for patient characteristics, presentation characteristics, surgical variables, socioeconomic characteristics, and baseline PRO values. RESULTS The mean age of the MIS cohort was 64.2 ± 11.5 yr [148 (57.1%) women and 111 (42.9%) men]. In multivariate analyses, aside from baseline PRO values, only 3 factors were significantly associated with multiple 24-mo PRO change scores: employment, age, and the addition of fusion to surgery. Employment was associated with superior postoperative ODI (ß-7.8; 95% CI [−12.9- −2.6]; P = .003), NRS back pain (ß-1.2; 95% CI [−2.1- −0.4]; P = 0.004), EQ-5D (ß0.1; 95% CI [0.01-0.1]; P = .03), and NASS satisfaction (OR = 0.27; 95% CI [0.12-0.58]; P < .001). Increasing age was associated with superior NRS leg pain (ß-0.1; 95% CI [minus;0.1- minus;0.01]; P = .03) and NASS satisfaction (OR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.92-0.99]; P = .02). The addition of a fusion was associated with superior ODI (ß-6.7; 95% CI [minus;12.7- minus;0.7]; P = .03), NRS back pain (ß-1.1; 95% CI [minus;2.1- minus;0.2]; P = .02), and NASS satisfaction (OR = 0.28; 95% CI [0.12-0.62]; P = .002). CONCLUSION Preoperative active employment, at least 4 yr of college education, and surgeries including a fusion were significant predictors of superior outcomes across the domains of disease-specific disability, back pain, leg pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Increasing age was predictive of superior outcomes for leg pain and satisfaction.

Download Full-text

In Reply: A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyaa372 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 87 (5) ◽

pp. E609-E610

Author(s):

Andrew K Chan ◽

Erica F Bission ◽

Mohamad Bydon ◽

Praveen V Mummaneni

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Quality Outcomes ◽

Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Download Full-text

Minimally Invasive Approaches for Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Neurosurgery Clinics of North America ◽

10.1016/j.nec.2019.02.004 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 30 (3) ◽

pp. 305-312 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ibrahim Hussain ◽

Sertac Kirnaz ◽

Gibran Wibawa ◽

Christoph Wipplinger ◽

Roger Härtl

Keyword(s):

Surgical Treatment ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Download Full-text

Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive “rocking” technique

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/2017.5.focus17199 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 43 (2) ◽

pp. E12 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Deshpande V. Rajakumar ◽

Akshay Hari ◽

Murali Krishna ◽

Ankit Sharma ◽

Manjunatha Reddy

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Sagittal Profile ◽

Fusion Construct ◽

Complete Reduction ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽

Adjacent Segments

OBJECTIVEDifferent surgical approaches have been described for treatment of spondylolisthesis, including in situ fusions, reductions of various degrees, and inclusion of healthy adjacent segments into the fusion construct. To the authors’ knowledge, there are only sparse reports describing consistent complete reduction and monosegmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis using a minimally invasive technique. The authors assess the efficacy of this technique in the reduction of local deformity and correction of overall sagittal profile in single-level spondylolisthesis.METHODSThis cohort study consists of a total of 36 consecutive patients treated over a period of 6 years. Patients with varying grades of lumbar spondylolisthesis (29 Meyerding Grade II and 7 Meyerding Grade III) were treated with operative reduction via minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in which the “rocking” technique was used. The clinical outcomes were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Revised Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low-back pain/dysfunction. Meyerding grade, pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), disc space angle (DSA), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were assessed to measure the radiological outcomes. These were reviewed for each patient for a minimum of 2 years.RESULTSAt most recent follow-up, 94% of patients were pain free. There were 2 patients (6%) who had moderate pain (which corresponded to higher-grade of listhesis), but all showed an improvement in pain scores (p < 0.05). The mean VAS score improved from 6.5 (SD 1.5) preoperatively to 1.6 (SD 1.3) and the mean ODI score improved from 53.7 (SD 13.1) preoperatively to 22.5 (SD 15.5) at 2-year follow-up.All radiological parameters improved following surgery. Most significant improvement was noted for LL, DSA, and SS. Both LL and SS were found to decrease, while DSA increased postoperatively. PI remained relatively unchanged, while PT showed a mild increase, which was not significant. Good fusion was achieved with implants in situ at 2-year follow-up. A 100% complete reduction of all grades of spondylolisthesis was achieved. The overall sagittal profile improved dramatically. No major perioperative complications were encountered.CONCLUSIONSMinimally invasive monosegmental TLIF for spondylolisthesis reduction using this rocking technique is effective in the treatment of various grades of spondylolisthesis. Consistent complete reduction of the slippage as well as excellent correction of overall sagittal profile can be achieved, and the need for including healthy adjacent segments in the fusion construct can be avoided.

Download Full-text

Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyaa206 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Andrew K Chan ◽

Erica F Bisson ◽

Mohamad Bydon ◽

Steven D Glassman ◽

Kevin T Foley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽

Back Pain ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Invasive Surgery ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Numeric Rating Scale ◽

Leg Pain ◽

Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Abstract BACKGROUND The factors driving the best outcomes following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis are not clearly elucidated. OBJECTIVE To investigate the factors that drive the best 24-mo patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following MIS surgery for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS A total of 259 patients from the Quality Outcomes Database lumbar spondylolisthesis module underwent single-level surgery for degenerative grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis with MIS techniques (188 fusions, 72.6%). Twenty-four-month follow-up PROs were collected and included the Oswestry disability index (ODI) change (ie, 24-mo minus baseline value), numeric rating scale (NRS) back pain change, NRS leg pain change, EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire change, and North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction questionnaire. Multivariable models were constructed to identify predictors of PRO change. RESULTS The mean age was 64.2 ± 11.5 yr and consisted of 148 (57.1%) women and 111 (42.9%) men. In multivariable analyses, employment was associated with superior postoperative ODI change (β-7.8; 95% CI [−12.9 to −2.6]; P = .003), NRS back pain change (β −1.2; 95% CI [−2.1 to −0.4]; P = .004), EQ-5D change (β 0.1; 95% CI [0.01-0.1]; P = .03), and NASS satisfaction (OR = 3.7; 95% CI [1.7-8.3]; P < .001). Increasing age was associated with superior NRS leg pain change (β −0.1; 95% CI [−0.1 to −0.01]; P = .03) and NASS satisfaction (OR = 1.05; 95% CI [1.01-1.09]; P = .02). Fusion surgeries were associated with superior ODI change (β −6.7; 95% CI [−12.7 to −0.7]; P = .03), NRS back pain change (β −1.1; 95% CI [−2.1 to −0.2]; P = .02), and NASS satisfaction (OR = 3.6; 95% CI [1.6-8.3]; P = .002). CONCLUSION Preoperative employment and surgeries, including a fusion, were predictors of superior outcomes across the domains of disease-specific disability, back pain, leg pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Increasing age was predictive of superior outcomes for leg pain improvement and satisfaction.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyz310_411 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Andrew Kai-Hong Chan ◽

Erica F Bisson ◽

Mohamad Bydon ◽

Steven D Glassman ◽

Kevin T Foley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Home Healthcare ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Quality Outcomes ◽

Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Abstract INTRODUCTION Here, we compare minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) to traditional, open TLIF for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in the largest study to date by sample size. METHODS We utilized the multicenter, prospective Quality Outcomes Database registry and queried patients with grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent single-segment surgery with fully minimally invasive or open TLIF methods. Outcomes were compared 24 mo postoperatively: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale Back Pain (NRS-BP), NRS Leg Pain (NRS-LP), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), North American Spine Society (NASS) Satisfaction Score, cumulative reoperation rate, and return to work (RTW) rate. Multivariate analyses were utilized to adjust for variables reaching P < .20 on univariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 297 patients were included: 72 (24.2%) MI-TLIF and 225 (75.8%) open TLIF. Average age (MI-TLIF: 62.1 vs open TLIF: 59.5 yr) was similar (P = .10). MI-TLIF surgeries were associated with lower body mass index (29.5 ± 5.1 vs 31.3 ± 7.0, P = .0497) and more workman's compensation cases (11.1% vs 1.3%, P = .001). Patients did not differ significantly at baseline for ODI, NRS BP, NRS LP and EQ-5D (P > .05). MI-TLIF was associated with less blood loss (108.8 ± 85.6 vs 299.6 ± 242.2 mL, P < .001), longer operations (228.2 ± 111.5 vs 189.6 ± 66.5 min, P < .001), and a trend toward decreased length of hospitalization (2.9 ± 1.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.6 d, P = 0.08). Discharge disposition to home or home healthcare was similar (94.4% vs 91.1%, P = .38). Both cohorts improved significantly from baseline for 24-month ODI, NRS-BP, NRS-LP, and EQ-5D (P > .001). In adjusted analyses, MI-TLIF was associated with superior ODI (ß = −4.7; 95% CI-9.3 −0.04; P = .048) and EQ-5D (ß = 0.06; 95% CI 0.009-0.11; P = .02). Though trends for superiority were evident for MI-TLIF, they did not reach statistical significance for NRS-BP (P = .06), NRS-LP (P = .07), and NASS Satisfaction (P = .06). Similarly, there was a trend for fewer reoperations following MI-TLIF, though this did not reach statistical significance (1.4% vs 7.6%, P = .10). A higher proportion of MI-TLIF patients were able to RTW following surgery (100% vs 80%, P = .02). CONCLUSION For single-level grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, MI-TLIF was associated with superior outcomes for disability and quality of life compared with traditional, open TLIF. MI-TLIF was associated with higher rates of RTW and less blood loss, but longer operative times.

Download Full-text