scholarly journals The time course of contrast masking reveals two distinct mechanisms of human surround suppression

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 808-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Petrov ◽  
M. Carandini ◽  
S. P. McKee
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael-Paul Schallmo ◽  
Alex M. Kale ◽  
Scott O. Murray

AbstractWhat we see depends on the spatial context in which it appears. Previous work has linked the reduction of perceived stimulus contrast in the presence of surrounding stimuli to the suppression of neural responses in early visual cortex. It has also been suggested that this surround suppression depends on at least two separable neural mechanisms, one ‘low-level’ and one ‘higher-level,’ which can be differentiated by their response characteristics. In a recent study, we found evidence consistent with these two suppression mechanisms using psychophysical measurements of perceived contrast. Here, we used EEG to demonstrate for the first time that neural responses in the human occipital lobe also show evidence of two separable suppression mechanisms. Eighteen adults (10 female and 8 male) each participated in a total of 3 experimental sessions, in which they viewed visual stimuli through a mirror stereoscope. The first session was used to definitively identify the C1 component, while the second and third comprised the main experiment. ERPs were measured in response to center gratings either with no surround, or with surrounding gratings oriented parallel or orthogonal, and presented either in the same eye (monoptic) or opposite eye (dichoptic). We found that the earliest ERP component (C1; ∼60 ms) was suppressed in the presence of surrounding stimuli, but that this suppression did not depend on surround configuration, suggesting a low-level suppression mechanism which is not tuned for relative orientation. A later response component (N1; ∼160 ms) showed stronger surround suppression for parallel and monoptic stimulus configurations, consistent with our earlier psychophysical results and a higher-level, binocular, orientation-tuned suppression mechanism. We conclude that these two surround suppression mechanisms have distinct response time courses in the human visual system, which can be differentiated using electrophysiology.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (20) ◽  
pp. 7690-7701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wyeth Bair ◽  
James R. Cavanaugh ◽  
J. Anthony Movshon

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael-Paul Schallmo ◽  
Alex M. Kale ◽  
Scott O. Murray

Author(s):  
K.W. Lee ◽  
R.H. Meints ◽  
D. Kuczmarski ◽  
J.L. Van Etten

The physiological, biochemical, and ultrastructural aspects of the symbiotic relationship between the Chlorella-like algae and the hydra have been intensively investigated. Reciprocal cross-transfer of the Chlorellalike algae between different strains of green hydra provide a system for the study of cell recognition. However, our attempts to culture the algae free of the host hydra of the Florida strain, Hydra viridis, have been consistently unsuccessful. We were, therefore, prompted to examine the isolated algae at the ultrastructural level on a time course.


Author(s):  
P. Maupin-Szamier ◽  
T. D. Pollard

We have studied the destruction of rabbit muscle actin filaments by osmium tetroxide (OSO4) to develop methods which will preserve the structure of actin filaments during preparation for transmission electron microscopy.Negatively stained F-actin, which appears as smooth, gently curved filaments in control samples (Fig. 1a), acquire an angular, distorted profile and break into progressively shorter pieces after exposure to OSO4 (Fig. 1b,c). We followed the time course of the reaction with viscometry since it is a simple, quantitative method to assess filament integrity. The difference in rates of decay in viscosity of polymerized actin solutions after the addition of four concentrations of OSO4 is illustrated in Fig. 2. Viscometry indicated that the rate of actin filament destruction is also dependent upon temperature, buffer type, buffer concentration, and pH, and requires the continued presence of OSO4. The conditions most favorable to filament preservation are fixation in a low concentration of OSO4 for a short time at 0°C in 100mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.0.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document