Comparison of Risk Factor Profiles for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Subtypes Defined by Pattern of Visual Field Loss: True Risk Factors or Arbitrary Definition?

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 6531
Author(s):  
Gokulan Ratnarajan ◽  
Cornelia Hirn ◽  
Eduardo Normando ◽  
Muriel Poli ◽  
Andrew Scott ◽  
...  
1997 ◽  
Vol 211 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etsuo Chihara ◽  
X. NIL ◽  
Jin Dong ◽  
Yasuyuki Takashima ◽  
Masayuki Akimoto ◽  
...  

Ophthalmology ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 105 (12) ◽  
pp. 2225-2230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A Teus ◽  
Miguel A Castejón ◽  
Miguel A Calvo ◽  
Patricia Pérez—Salaı́ces ◽  
Ana Marcos

Eye ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 643-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
P G D Spry ◽  
J M Sparrow ◽  
J P Diamond ◽  
H S Harris

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Kitaoka ◽  
Masaki Tanito ◽  
Yu Yokoyama ◽  
Koji Nitta ◽  
Maki Katai ◽  
...  

Purpose. The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual field loss progression group and no-progression group. Methods. The study included 187 eyes of 187 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. We divided the mean deviation (MD) slope values of all patients into the progression group (<−0.3 dB/year) and no-progression group (≧−0.3 dB/year). ONH morphological parameters were calculated with prototype analysis software. The correlations between glaucomatous visual field progression and patient characteristics or each ONH parameter were analyzed with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results. The MD slope averages in the progression group and no-progression group were −0.58 ± 0.28 dB/year and 0.05 ± 0.26 dB/year, respectively. Among disc parameters, vertical disc width (diameter), disc area, cup area, and cup volume in the progression group were significantly less than those in the no-progression group. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the visual field progression and disc area (odds ratio 0.49/mm2 disc area). Conclusion. A smaller disc area may be associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document