Conceptual and Measurement Properties of the Productivity Environmental Preference Survey as a Measure of Learning Style

1994 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 1002-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Murray-Harvey
1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 307-310
Author(s):  
Terry L. Stawar ◽  
William Stemm ◽  
Susan Truett

36 chronically mentally ill adults were administered the perceptual learning style items (auditory, visual, kinesthetic) from the Productivity Environmental Preference Survey. A retest was given 6 months later. Analysis showed that, although the instrument can be reliably scored, content and time sampling error more than account for the variance in these subtests. Self-reported perceptual learning style appears to be a transient phenomenon of limited practical utility in this population.


1991 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie LaMothe ◽  
Diane M. Billings ◽  
Anne Belcher ◽  
Karen Cobb ◽  
Ann Nice ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Hallin ◽  
Marie Haggstrom ◽  
Britt Backstrom ◽  
Lisbeth Kristiansen

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>Health care educators account for variables affecting patient safety and are responsible for developing the highly complex process of education planning. Clinical judgement is a multidimensional process, which may be affected by learning styles. The aim was to explore three specific hypotheses to test correlations between nursing students’ team achievements in clinical judgement and emotional, sociological and physiological learning style preferences.</p> <p><strong>METHODS: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with Swedish university nursing students in 2012–2013. Convenience sampling was used with 60 teams with 173 nursing students in the final semester of a three-year Bachelor of Science in nursing programme. Data collection included questionnaires of personal characteristics, learning style preferences, determined by the Dunn and Dunn Productivity Environmental Preference Survey, and videotaped complex nursing simulation scenarios. Comparison with Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric and Non-parametric analyses were performed.</p> <p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> Three significant correlations were found between the team achievements and the students’ learning style preferences: significant negative correlation with ‘Structure’ and ‘Kinesthetic’ at the individual level, and positive correlation with the ‘Tactile’ variable. No significant correlations with students’ ‘Motivation’, ‘Persistence’, ‘Wish to learn alone’ and ‘Wish for an authoritative person present’ were seen.<em> </em></p> <p><strong>DISCUSSION &amp; CONCLUSION:</strong> There were multiple complex interactions between the tested learning style preferences and the team achievements of clinical judgement in the simulation room, which provides important information for the becoming nurses. Several factors may have influenced the results that should be acknowledged when designing further research. We suggest conducting mixed methods to determine further relationships between team achievements, learning style preferences, cognitive learning outcomes and group processes.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Iwata ◽  
Akizumi Tsutsumi ◽  
Takafumi Wakita ◽  
Ryuichi Kumagai ◽  
Hiroyuki Noguchi ◽  
...  

Abstract. To investigate the effect of response alternatives/scoring procedures on the measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) which has the four response alternatives, a polytomous item response theory (IRT) model was applied to the responses of 2,061 workers and university students (1,640 males, 421 females). Test information functions derived from the polytomous IRT analyses on the CES-D data with various scoring procedures indicated that: (1) the CES-D with its standard (0-1-2-3) scoring procedure should be useful for screening to detect subjects with “at high-risk” of depression if the θ point showing the highest information corresponds to the cut-off point, because of its extremely higher information; (2) the CES-D with the 0-1-1-2 scoring procedure could cover wider range of depressive severity, suggesting that this scoring procedure might be useful in cases where more exhaustive discrimination in symptomatology is of interest; and (3) the revised version of CES-D with replacing original positive items into negatively revised items outperformed the original version. These findings have never been demonstrated by the classical test theory analyses, and thus the utility of this kind of psychometric testing should be warranted to further investigation for the standard measures of psychological assessment.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Schall ◽  
Michelle L. Rusch ◽  
Geb Thomas ◽  
John D. Lee
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura S. Testerman ◽  
Nichole C. Hardy ◽  
Matthew T. Tatum ◽  
Holly M. Irwin-Chase ◽  
Jim Johnson

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Tatum ◽  
Nichole C. Hardy ◽  
Laura S. Testerman ◽  
Holly M. Irwin-Chase ◽  
John T. Wu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document