The Passion Narrative: Luke 19:28-24:53

1967 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-522
Author(s):  
J. L. Blevins
Keyword(s):  
Passion Narrative

The Passion Narrative According to Matthew, A Redactional Study

1977 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Delvin D. Hutton ◽  
Donald P. Senior
Keyword(s):  
Passion Narrative

St John and the Marcan Passion Narrative

1958 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivor Buse
Keyword(s):  
Passion Narrative

Jesus and Peter at the High Pries's House: A Test Case for the Question of the Relation Between Mark's and John's Gospels

1978 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Fortna
Keyword(s):  
New Testament ◽  
Gospel Of John ◽  
Gospel Of Mark ◽  
Test Case ◽  
High Priest ◽  
Passion Narrative ◽  
Strong Case ◽  
Long Time ◽  
General Opinion

Some recent redaction-critical work on Mark's passion narrative has questioned the existence of a pre-Markan passion account. This in turn has suggested another look at the relation between the gospels of Mark and John. Norman Perrin has put it plainly:For a long time the general opinion of New Testament scholars was that the passion narrative existed as a connected unit before the gospel of Mark was written, and it was easy and natural to think that John had known and used a version of that pre-Markan narrative rather than the gospel of Mark. But today the tendency is to ascribe more and more of the composition of the passion narrative to the evangelist Mark himself and to doubt the very existence of a pre-Markan and non-Markan passion narrative extensive enough to have been the basis for the gospel of John. A particular consideration is the fact that the trial before the High Priest (John 18: 19–24) is set in the context of the denial by Peter (18: 15–18, 25–7), as it is also in the gospel of Mark. But there is a strong case that Mark himself originally composed this account of the trial at night before the Jewish authorities and then set it in the context of the story of Peter's denial. If this is so, the evangelist John must necessarily have known the gospel of Mark.

How Should One Read the Bible?

2018 ◽  
pp. 186-218
Author(s):  
Jane de Gay
Keyword(s):  
Washington State ◽  
State University ◽  
Passion Narrative ◽  
Washington State University ◽  
The Bible ◽  
Biblical Allusion ◽  
Modern Fiction ◽  
Late Nineteenth ◽  
Leonard Woolf

This chapter reveals the extent of Virginia Woolf’s knowledge and interest in the Bible, both as text and as artefact, starting with an examination of the collection of Bibles in the Library of Virginia and Leonard Woolf, now housed in Washington State University, Pullman. It situates Woolf’s interests within competing scholarly understandings of the role and significance of the Bible that were in circulation in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Making close readings of Woolf’s use of biblical allusion, the chapter demonstrates that Woolf’s responses to the Bible were both complex and varied. These readings include her use of rhetoric in her essays, ‘Modern Fiction’ in particular, and her engagement with the Passion narrative in her novels as a way of exploring questions about salvation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document