scholarly journals St. Luke's Passion-Narrative considered with Reference to the Synoptic Problem

1904 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 273-276
Author(s):  
John C. Hawkins
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-406
Author(s):  
Olegs Andrejevs

The level of scepticism met by the concept of macro-chiasm in ancient literature is noticeably lower today than two decades ago, with sizable agreement coalescing around certain examples. One such example is found in the synoptic double-tradition material as it is preserved in Luke's Gospel, which provides the methodological foundation for the reconstruction of the hypothetical synoptic source document Q. This article explores the study of the macro-chiasm identified in Luke (Q) 3.7–7.35 and its implications for the synoptic problem. It also addresses the methodological considerations advanced by S. E. Porter and J. T. Reed in their NTS article two decades ago, meeting a certain stipulation placed by them upon subsequent scholarship.


1977 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Delvin D. Hutton ◽  
Donald P. Senior
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-582
Author(s):  
J. K. Elliott
Keyword(s):  

Serious study of the synoptic problem can be undertaken only with the aid of a Greek synopsis. At the present time three such synopses are readily available: Aland's Synopsis Quattuor Evangeliorum now in its 12th edition, the 13th edition of Huck extensively revised by H. Greeven and the recently published text by B. Orchard. In this article these synopses are referred to as follows: Aland as Syn when all 12 editions are intended, otherwise as SynA=1–8 or SynB=9–12 to differentiate between the two major editions of the text, the earlier of which has a text comparable with the twenty-fifth edition of Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece (= N–A25) and the later a text comparable with N-A26; Greeven's revision as H-G; and Orchard's text as Orchard.


1958 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivor Buse
Keyword(s):  

1923 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry J. Cadbury

A new and not unfruitful stage in the literary criticism of the gospels seems to be marked by the recent publication in Germany of three important books. For nearly a century the Synoptic problem has absorbed the attention of scholars. The fascinating riddle of likeness and difference in our first three gospels challenged them to find a solution. It became clear that this was a question of written sources, and for many minds the “two-document hypothesis,” that Mark and some other common written Greek material (Q) are embodied independently in Matthew and in Luke, has come to provide a working basis of investigation, although the categorical denial of this view by the Papal Biblical Commission makes it impossible for Roman Catholic scholars to accept it in its current form. There remain, however, the question of other Greek sources, as, for example, the sources for Mark's and for Luke's special material, and the question of the possibility of Semitic originals, on which no conclusion has been attained and on which perhaps more light may soon be expected from further studies.


1967 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-522
Author(s):  
J. L. Blevins
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document