Examining Transformational Resistance Through a Critical Race and Latcrit Theory Framework

2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Solorzano ◽  
Dolores Delgado Bernal
Keyword(s):  
Critical Race ◽  
Transformational Resistance ◽  
Latcrit Theory ◽  
Theory Framework

scholarly journals Latina and Latino Critical Legal Theory: LatCrit Theory, Praxis and Community.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1316-1341
Author(s):  
Marc Tizoc Gonzalez ◽  
Saru Matambanadzo ◽  
Sheila I. Vélez Martínez
Keyword(s):  
Critical Race Theory ◽  
Queer Theory ◽  
Cultural Change ◽  
Asian American ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Critical Race ◽  
Critical Race Feminism ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
Critical Legal Theory ◽  
Latcrit Theory

Abstract LatCrit theory is a relatively recent genre of critical “outsider jurisprudence” – a category of contemporary scholarship including critical legal studies, feminist legal theory, critical race theory, critical race feminism, Asian American legal scholarship and queer theory. This paper overviews LatCrit’s foundational propositions, key contributions, and ongoing efforts to cultivate new generations of ethical advocates who can systemically analyze the sociolegal conditions that engender injustice and intervene strategically to help create enduring sociolegal, and cultural, change. The paper organizes this conversation highlighting Latcrit’s theory, community and praxis.

“I Was Considered a Throw Away Child”

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-33
Author(s):  
Taryn VanderPyl ◽  
Kelsie Cruz ◽  
Hannah McCauley
Keyword(s):  
Critical Race Theory ◽  
Young Men ◽  
Incarcerated Youth ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Critical Race ◽  
Race Theory ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
School To Prison Pipeline ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
Theory Framework

The concept of the school-to-prison pipeline (STPP) has been extensively studied over the last few decades, yet few have included the perspective of those whom it has affected—incarcerated adolescent and adult males. Educators and policy makers are limited in determining solutions because they are missing this key perspective. Using a critical race theory framework, we focus on the voices of incarcerated youth and adults who have personally experienced the STPP. Young men within the juvenile and adult justice systems were asked their thoughts on and experiences with the STPP. Responses from 16 participants are shared, along with what they believe would have worked to help them stay out of the system, and their recommendations for how to improve the factors contributing to the STPP

Are We Doing Diversity Justice? A Critical Exchange

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-119
Author(s):  
Chiamaka Enyi-Amadi ◽  
Emma Penney
Keyword(s):  
Trinity College ◽  
Literary Culture ◽  
Value Systems ◽  
Irish Literature ◽  
Critical Race ◽  
Roundtable Discussion ◽  
Literary Value ◽  
Irish Studies ◽  
Trinity College Dublin ◽  
Race Analysis

This critical exchange is based on a conversation between the authors which took place during the Irish University Review Roundtable Discussion: Displacing the Canon (2019 IASIL Conference, Trinity College Dublin). As authors we give first-hand accounts of our experience writing, editing, and teaching in Ireland, attempting to draw out concerns we have for the future of Irish literature and Irish Studies that specifically relate to race. The conversation here suggests that race directly impacts what we consider valuable in our literary culture. We both insist on decentring universalism as a governing literary critical concept and insist on the urgent application of critical race analysis to the construction of literary value systems in Ireland.

The Racialization of the African-American and Asian-American Citizen: A Comparative Legal Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 30-41
Author(s):  
Mallory Yung
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
Asian Americans ◽  
Asian American ◽  
Model Minority ◽  
Legal Discourse ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Critical Race ◽  
Social Hierarchies ◽  
American Citizen

The perception of racial tensions in North American settler countries has historically been focused on the Black/White relationship, as has much of the theoretical legal discourse surrounding the concept of “race”. Accordingly, the scope of much critical race scholarship has been restricted such that it rarely acknowledges the racial tensions that persist between different racially-excluded minorities. This paper hopes to expand and integrate the examination of Black and Asian-American racialization that critical race scholars have previously revealed. It will do this by historicizing the respective contours of Black and Asian-American racialization processes through legislation and landmark court cases in a neo-colonial context. The defining features of racialization which have culminated in the ultimate divergence of each group’s racialization will be compared and contrasted. This divergence sees the differential labeling of Asian-Americans as the ‘model minority’ while Blacks continue to be subjugated by modern modalities of exclusionary systems of control. The consequences of this divergence in relation to preserving existing racial and social hierarchies will be discussed in the final sections of this paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document