Treatment Methods for Spinal Cord Injury Caused by Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e106-e107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuaki Fujisawa ◽  
Kiyofumi Morishita ◽  
Johji Fukada ◽  
Nobuyoshi Kawaharada ◽  
Yoshikazu Hachiro ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 153857442110451
Author(s):  
Masaki Kano ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Kentaro Kamiya ◽  
Hitoshi Ogino

We report 2 cases of successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD) complicated with spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Case 1. A 70-year-old gentleman found with an uncomplicated ABAD with false lumen occluded, developed SCI shortly after admission during the initial medical management. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was initiated followed by emergent TEVAR. SCI improved, and the patient was discharged. Case 2. A 52-year-old gentleman developed uncomplicated ABAD with patent false lumen. 5 hours after admission, he developed SCI during the initial medical management. Emergent TEVAR was performed followed by CSFD, and the SCI improved before discharge. These cases prompted us to address prompt TEVAR for primary entry closure and true lumen dilatation with postoperative hypertensive management to relieve the dynamic obstruction of the segmental arteries responsible for the compromised spinal cord circulation in complicated ABAD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-178
Author(s):  
Meenakshi M Subbiah ◽  
Bashi V Velayudhan

Paraplegia is a common complication encountered during surgical and endovascular repair of aortic diseases. At times, it is also a presenting feature of aortic dissection. Involvement of more than one spinal blood supply system is the most common cause of spinal cord ischemia. Proper planning is needed to prevent and treat spinal cord ischemia. We report this rare case of acute type B aortic dissection that presented with paraplegia due to a spinal subarachnoid hemorrhage.


2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. 1119-1127
Author(s):  
Yu Hohri ◽  
Takuma Yamasaki ◽  
Yuichi Matsuzaki ◽  
Takeshi Hiramatsu

Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of spinal cord injury in total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection using our spinal cord protection technique. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2017, 33 patients underwent total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection (mean age 67.9 ± 13.3 years). Our spinal cord protection technique involved maintaining extracorporeal circulation through the left subclavian artery in all procedures, using aortic occlusion balloon during distal anastomosis, and inserting frozen elephant trunk above Th 8 with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Computed tomography was performed within 1–2 weeks, 12 months, and 36 months postoperatively. We compared the degree of thrombosis of the descending aorta between preoperation and early postoperative period by Fisher’s exact test. Moreover, we evaluated postoperative mortality and mobility (including spinal cord injury) at follow-up. Results The operative mortality within 30 days was 6.1%. Neither paraplegia nor paraparesis was noted. We observed significant thrombosis of the false lumen at the distal arch and aortic valve level of the descending aorta in postoperative early term period (p < 0.01). At mid-term follow-up (mean 33.9 months), survival probability and 3-year freedom from reoperation rates were 93.9 ± 4.1% and 95.0 ± 4.9%, respectively. Conclusions The frozen elephant trunk technique with our spinal protection strategy provides good postoperative outcomes. Our strategy can maintain spinal cord perfusion without complete ischemia time even during lower body ischemia time. Implementation of our spinal protection strategy will help prevent spinal cord injury and dilated downstream aorta.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Morishita ◽  
Hideyuki Tomioka ◽  
Seiichiro Katahira ◽  
Takeshi Hoshino ◽  
Kazuhiko Hanzawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document