scholarly journals Prolonged-release Oxycodone/Naloxone in Postoperative Pain Management: From a Randomized Clinical Trial to Usual Clinical Practice

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1775-1793 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kuusniemi ◽  
J Zöllner ◽  
S Sjövall ◽  
J Huhtala ◽  
P Karjalainen ◽  
...  
Medwave ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. e8134-e8134
Author(s):  
Nicolás Arriaza ◽  
Cristian Papuzinski ◽  
Matías Kirmayr ◽  
Marcelo Matta ◽  
Fernando Aranda ◽  
...  

Background Postoperative pain management contributes to reducing postoperative morbidity and unscheduled readmission. Compared to other opioids that manage postoperative pain like morphine, few randomized trials have tested the efficacy of intraoperatively administered methadone to provide evidence for its regular use or be included in clinical guidelines. Methods We conducted a randomized clinical trial comparing the use of intraoperative methadone to assess its impact on postoperative pain. Eighty-six patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were allocated to receive either methadone (0.08 mg/kg) or morphine (0.08 mg/kg). Results Individuals who received methadone required less rescue morphine in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit for postoperative pain than those who received morphine (p = 0.0078). The patients from the methadone group reported less pain at 5 and 15 minutes and 12 and 24 hours following Post Anesthesia Care Unit discharge, exhibiting fewer episodes of nausea. Time to eye-opening was equivalent between the two groups. Conclusion Intraoperative use of methadone resulted in better management of postoperative pain, supporting its use as part of a multimodal pain management strategy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under remifentanil-based anesthesia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-107
Author(s):  
Adriana Cadavid-Puentes ◽  
Francisco José Bermúdez-Guerrero ◽  
Olga Giraldo-Salazar ◽  
Fabio Muñoz-Zapata ◽  
Juan Otálvaro-Henao ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-107
Author(s):  
Adriana Cadavid-Puentes ◽  
Francisco José Bermúdez-Guerrero ◽  
Olga Giraldo-Salazar ◽  
Fabio Muñoz-Zapata ◽  
Juan Otálvaro-Henao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDUARDO OLANO-ESPINOSA ◽  
Jose Francisco Avila-Tomas ◽  
Cesar Minue-Lorenzo ◽  
Blanca Matilla Pardo ◽  
Encarnación Serrano-Serrano ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The magnitude and severity of smoking, the benefits of quitting, and the existence of effective and efficient interventions make it a priority problem. Health professionals intervene less than they should, and the most effective interventions are more expensive, require specific training and more time, which is a disadvantage for the service provider and for the accessibility of the services. Information and communication technologies avoid these problems thanks to their accessibility, privacy, customization possibilities, access to social support, and scalability. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of an evidence-based intervention to cease smoking via a chatbot in the smartphone compared to usual clinical practice in primary care. METHODS Pragmatic randomized clinical trial in 34 primary healthcare centers within the Madrid Health Service (Spain). Smokers over 18 years of age who attended on-site consultation and accepted help to quit tobacco were recruited by their doctor or nurse and randomly allocated to receive usual care (control group, CG) or an evidence-based chatbot intervention (intervention group, IG). The interventions in both arms were based on the 5A´s by the US clinical practice guideline, which combines behavioral and pharmacological treatments and is structured in several follow-up appointments. The primary outcome was continuous abstinence from smoking that was biochemically validated after 6 months by the collaborators. The outcome analysis was blinded to allocation of subjects although participants were unblinded to group assignment. An intention-to-treat analysis, entering the basal observation carried forward in cases of missing data, and logistic regression models with robust estimators were employed for assessing the primary outcomes. RESULTS The trial was conducted between October 1st of 2018 and March 31st of 2019. The sample comprised 513 patients (242 in the IG and 271 in the CG), with an average age of 49.8 years (SD 10.82) and gender ratio of 59.3% women and 40.7% men. Of them, 232 patients (45.2%) completed the follow-up, 104 (42.9%) in the IG and 128 (47.2%) in the CG. Main outcome: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the biochemically-validated abstinence rate at 6 months was higher in the IG with 26.03% (63/242) versus 18.82% (51/271) in the CG (odds ratio (OR)=1.52, 95% CI: 1.00–2.31, P=.05). After adjusting for basal CO-oxymetry and bupropion intake, no substantial changes were observed (OR=1.52, 95% CI 0.99–2.33 P= .053; pseudo R2=0.045). In the IG, 61.16% (148/242) of users accessed the chatbot, average bot-patient interaction time was 121 minutes (CI 95% 121.1–140.0), and average number of contacts was 45.56 (SD 36.32). CONCLUSIONS A treatment including a chatbot for helping in tobacco cessation was more effective than usual clinical practice in primary care. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov, reference number NCT 03445507.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document