Do Outcomes or Subsequent Injuries Differ After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Autograft?

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1473-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Peter N. Chalmers ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Kevin Ma ◽  
Joshua S. Dines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Injury Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a successful procedure in professional baseball players. It is unclear whether graft choice affects results. Purpose: Determine performance and rate of return to sport (RTS) in professional baseball players after UCLR and compare performance and RTS rate, as well as injury rates, between players who underwent UCLR with hamstring versus palmaris autograft. Hypothesis: A high RTS rate exists in professional baseball players after UCLR, with no significant difference in injury rates, RTS rates, or performance specifically related to primary outcome performance variables—WHIP ([walks + hits]/innings pitched), fielding independent pitching (FIP), and wins above replacement (WAR)—between those who undergo UCLR with palmaris versus hamstring autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All professional baseball players who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft between 2010 and 2015 were included. Surgical details were gathered from operative reports. Players with hamstring UCLR were compared with a matched control group of players who underwent UCLR with palmaris autograft. Results: Overall, 195 players underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft. No differences in RTS rates or timing to RTS were found between the hamstring and palmaris groups. Significantly more subsequent injuries to the contralateral lower extremity were seen in the hamstring group versus the palmaris group (25 vs 13, respectively) ( P = .040). More subsequent injuries to the upper extremity were found in the palmaris group versus the hamstring group (73 vs 55, respectively), although this difference was not significant ( P = .052). No consistent differences in performance metrics upon RTS existed between hamstring and palmaris groups, although both groups significantly declined in many performance metrics after surgery. Both hamstring and palmaris groups showed a decline postoperatively in WAR (0.86 vs 0.35 and 1.23 vs 0.34, respectively) and WHIP (1.33 vs 1.44 and 1.36 vs 1.51, respectively); FIP did not decline (4.56 vs 5.27 and 4.51 vs 4.53, respectively). No significant difference in WAR, WHIP, or FIP existed between groups postoperatively. Conclusion: Baseball players who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft were more likely to sustain a subsequent lower extremity injury, whereas those who underwent UCLR with palmaris autograft had a trend toward sustaining more upper extremity injuries. No difference in performance or RTS rates existed between groups. Both groups significantly declined in WAR and WHIP after UCLR.

Side of Hamstring Harvest Does Not Affect Performance, Return-to-Sport Rate, or Future Hamstring Injuries After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Among Professional Baseball Pitchers

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Peter N. Chalmers ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Kevin Ma ◽  
Christopher S. Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Injury Rates ◽  
Hamstring Injuries ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a successful procedure among professional baseball pitchers. It is unclear if hamstring tendon harvest side for UCLR affects the outcome or alters the risk for subsequent hamstring injury. Hypothesis: Players with prior UCLR with ipsilateral (drive leg) hamstring autograft will have the same return-to-sport (RTS) rate and performance upon RTS but a higher number of subsequent lower extremity injuries than those with contralateral (landing leg) hamstring autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All players between 2010 and 2015 who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft were included. Surgical details of their procedures were recorded from operative reports. Outcomes for UCLR with hamstring autograft harvested from the drive leg were compared with UCLR with the graft harvested from the landing leg. Results: Overall, 191 players underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft (drive leg, n = 58, 30%; landing leg, n = 133, 70%). The docking technique was more common in the drive leg group, while the figure-of-8 technique was more common in the landing leg group ( P > .001). More patients in the landing leg group underwent concomitant treatment of the ulnar nerve than the drive leg group ( P < .001). No difference existed in RTS rates or timing of RTS between groups. No differences in subsequent ipsilateral or contralateral hamstring injuries occurred between players who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft from the drive leg or the landing leg ( P≥ .999 and P = .460, respectively). No difference in overall upper or lower extremity injury rates existed between groups (all P > .05), and no difference in performance metrics existed between groups upon RTS. Conclusion: No difference in RTS rate, performance upon RTS, or subsequent injury rates (hamstring, lower extremity, or upper extremity) existed between players who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft whether the graft came from the drive or the landing leg.

scholarly journals Timing of Return to Batting Milestones Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Players

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0037
Author(s):  
Brandon Erickson ◽  
Peter Chalmers ◽  
D John ◽  
Kevin Ma ◽  
Scott Sheridan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Batting Performance ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

Objectives: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a common procedure in professional baseball position players. Timing of return to hitting following UCLR is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the time to return to batting milestones after UCLR as well as the effect of UCLR upon batting performance in professional baseball players. The authors’ hypothesized that position players would return to batting in an in-season game prior to fielding in an in-season game and hitting performance would remain unchanged following UCLR Methods: All professional position players who underwent UCLR between 2010-2018 were included. Time to batting milestones following UCLR was analyzed. Batting performance before and after UCLR was compared and analyzed. Results: Overall, 141 UCLRs (96% performed on the dominant arm) in 137 position players were included (86% minor leaguers). Four players underwent revision, all within one year of the primary UCLR. With regard to position, catchers and shortstops were over-represented. With regard to batting side, 57% batted from the right and 12% batted as switch-hitters, and thus 76% of surgeries were on the lead arm. While 91% of players were able to return to any throwing at all, there was a progressive gradual decline during the rehabilitation progress such that 77% were able to return to hitting in a real game and 75% were able to return to fielding in a real game. The first dry swing occurred at 150±49 days after surgery, first batting practice occurred at 195±58 days after surgery, and first hitting in a real game occurred at 323±92 days after surgery. However, players generally saw a decrease in their utilization, with fewer at bats (p<0.001) translating into fewer hits (p<0.001) and runs (p<0.001). Conclusion: Professional position players begin swinging at 150 days following UCLR while they do not hit batting practice until 195 days and do not hit in a real game until 323 days following UCLR. Players saw a decrease in hitting utilization following UCLR. [Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes Based on Graft Type and Tunnel Configuration for Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Pitchers

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0008
Author(s):  
Timothy B. Griffith ◽  
Christopher S. Ahmad ◽  
Michael G. Ciccotti ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Joshua S. Dines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Elbow Surgery ◽  
Baseball Pitchers ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

Objectives: Professional baseball pitchers are at high risk for tears of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow, often requiring subsequent surgical reconstruction. Despite acceptable published return to play outcomes, multiple techniques and graft types have been described. There is a paucity of clinical data in the current literature comparing UCL reconstruction surgical technique and graft type. Even less is known about the risks for subsequent injury, surgery, or revision UCL reconstruction. Accordingly, this study compares UCL reconstruction outcomes based on tunnel configuration and graft type. Methods: Following approval from our institutional review board and Major League Baseball (MLB), 566 professional baseball pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2010 and 2014 were identified and included. The following patient demographics were analyzed: age, pitching role (starter vs. reliever), level of play (MLB vs. Minor League Baseball [MiLB]), and throwing side dominance. Surgical factors analyzed included reconstruction technique (Docking vs. Modified Jobe), graft type (palmaris longus autograft vs. gracilis autograft), and concomitant procedures. Primary outcome measures consisted of: the ability to return to play at any level (RTP), to return to the same level of play (RSL), the time to return, subsequent elbow injuries, and the need for subsequent or revision elbow surgery. The impact of the patient and surgical factors on outcomes were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regression modeling. Results: The overall RTP was 79.9% and RSL was 71.2%. There were no significant differences in the time to RTP or RSL based on reconstruction technique or graft type. RTP rates were similar for the Docking vs. Modified Jobe techniques (80.1% vs. 82.4%; p=0.537) and for the two primary graft types (83.1% for palmaris vs. 80.7% for gracilis; p=0.596). The risk of subsequent elbow surgery was 10.5% for the Docking Technique vs. 14.8% for the Modified Jobe (p=0.203); and the risk for subsequent UCL revision reconstruction surgery was 2.9% vs. 6.2% for the Docking vs. Modified Jobe Techniques, respectively (p=0.128). Significant trends towards an increasing use of palmaris autograft (p=0.023) and the docking technique (p=0.006) were observed. MLB pitchers were more likely than MiLB pitchers to RTP (p<0.001) and to RSL (p<0.001), but they required a longer time to return (mean difference 35 days; p=0.039), had a higher likelihood of subsequent elbow (OR 3.58; 95% CI 2.055 to 6.231; p<0.001) and forearm injuries (OR 5.695; 95% CI 1.99 to 16.302; p=0.004), but not subsequent elbow surgery. No specific variables were noted to be predictive of subsequent elbow or revision surgery in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Surgical outcomes in professional baseball players are not significantly influenced by ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique or graft type usage. Major League players are more likely to RTP and RSL, but they have a higher frequency of subsequent elbow and forearm injuries. Both the Docking Technique and palmaris autograft are increasing in popularity amongst surgeons treating professional baseball players.

scholarly journals Performance and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Players

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596711987843
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Peter N. Chalmers ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Kevin Ma ◽  
Diane L. Dahm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drilling Technique ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the gold standard treatment for ACL tears to allow baseball players to return to sport (RTS). The optimal graft type and femoral tunnel drilling technique are currently unknown. Hypothesis: There is a high rate of RTS in professional baseball players after ACLR, with no significant difference in RTS rates or performance between cases and controls or between graft types or femoral drilling techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All professional baseball players who underwent ACLR between 2010 and 2015 were included. Demographic and performance data (pre- and postoperative) for each player were recorded. Performance metrics were then compared between cases and matched controls. Results: A total of 124 players (mean age, 23.7 ± 4.1 years; 83% minor league players) underwent ACLR. Of these, 80% returned to sport (73% to the same or higher level) at a mean 310 ± 109 days overall and 333 ± 126 days at the same or higher level. The most common graft type was an ipsilateral bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft (n = 87; 70%). A total of 91 players underwent concomitant meniscal debridement or repair. No significant difference in any of the primary performance metrics existed from before to after ACLR. Compared with matched controls, no significant difference existed in RTS rates or any performance metrics after ACLR. No significant difference existed in RTS rates or primary performance outcome measures between graft types or femoral drilling techniques. Conclusion: The RTS rate for professional baseball players after ACLR was 80%. No significant difference in performance metrics existed between BTB and hamstring autografts or between femoral drilling techniques. Furthermore, no significant difference in performance or RTS rates existed between cases and matched controls. Femoral drilling technique and graft type did not affect performance and RTS rates in professional baseball players after ACLR.

Timing of Return to Batting Milestones After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Players

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1465-1470
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Peter N. Chalmers ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Kevin Ma ◽  
Scott Sheridan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Batting Performance ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a common procedure in professional baseball position players. Timing of return to hitting after UCLR is unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the time to return to batting milestones after UCLR as well as the effect of UCLR upon batting performance in professional baseball players. The hypothesis was that position players would return to batting in an in-season game before fielding in an in-season game, and hitting performance would remain unchanged after UCLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All professional position players who underwent UCLR between 2010 and 2018 were included. Time to batting milestones after UCLR was analyzed. Batting performance before and after UCLR was compared and analyzed. Results: Overall, 141 UCLRs (96% performed on the dominant arm) in 137 position players were included (86% Minor League players). Four players underwent revision, all within 1 year of the primary UCLR. With regard to position, catchers and shortstops were overrepresented. With regard to batting side, 57% batted from the right and 12% batted as switch-hitters. Of the surgeries, 76% were on the trail/back arm. While 91% of players returned to some form of throwing, there was a progressive gradual decline as the rehabilitation process progressed, as only 77% were able to return to hitting in a real game and 75% were able to return to fielding in a real game. The first dry swing occurred at 150 ± 49 days after surgery, the first batting practice occurred at 195 ± 58 days after surgery, the first hitting in a real game occurred at 323 ± 92 days after surgery, and the first fielding in a real game occurred at 343 ± 98 days after surgery. However, players generally saw a decrease in their utilization, with fewer at bats ( P < .001) translating into fewer hits ( P < .001) and runs ( P < .001). Conclusion: Professional position players begin swinging at 150 days (approximately 5 months) after UCLR, while they do not hit in batting practice until 195 days (approximately 6.5 months) and do not hit in a real game until 323 days (approximately 10.7 months) after UCLR. Players see a decrease in hitting utilization after UCLR. On average, players hit in a real game 20 days before fielding in a real game.

Effect of Younger Starting Pitching Age on Humeral Retrotorsion in Baseball Pitchers With an Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199080
Author(s):  
Sean M. Kennedy ◽  
Joseph P. Hannon ◽  
John E. Conway ◽  
Kalyssa Creed ◽  
J. Craig Garrison
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury ◽  
Baseball Pitchers ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Increased humeral retrotorsion (HRT) has been found to be a risk factor for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears in baseball players. Recent work has demonstrated the age of 11 years as a potential watershed age for HRT development. Hypothesis: In a group of baseball pitchers with UCL injuries, athletes who started pitching before the age of 10 years will demonstrate significantly more dominant limb humeral retrotorsion (DHRT) when compared with a group of baseball pitchers who reported starting pitching at 10 years or older. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 84 baseball pitchers with a diagnosed UCL injury were divided into 2 groups based upon the age at which participants began pitching: 33 players reporting a starting pitching age of 10 years or older (group 1) were compared with 51 baseball pitchers reporting a starting pitching age under 10 years (group 2). Participants’ DHRT and nondominant limb humeral retrotorsion (NDHRT) were measured using diagnostic ultrasound. Independent t tests were run to compare mean group differences of all patient data, starting pitching age, age at time of injury, DHRT, NDHRT, and humeral retrotorsion difference (HRTdiff). Results: There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age at time of injury, height, weight, or playing years’ experience. There was a statistically significant difference in the participant-reported starting pitching age. Significant differences between groups were noted for DHRT (group 1: 20.0°± 9.4°, group 2: 14.5°± 10.3°, P = .015) and for NDHRT (group 1: 38.6°± 8.8°, group 2: 32.9°± 9.5°, P = .007). No significant differences between groups were found for HRTdiff ( P = .940). Conclusion: Baseball pitchers with a UCL injury who reported a starting pitching age younger than 10 years demonstrated significantly greater DHRT and NDHRT when compared with UCL-injured baseball pitchers who reported a starting pitching age at 10 years or later. The results of this study demonstrate that a younger starting pitching age results in increased HRT in players with UCL injuries.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of the Nonoperative Treatment of Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Professional Baseball Players with and without Platelet-Rich Plasma

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Douglas McQueen ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
Aakash Chauhan ◽  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Hollis G. Potter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Time ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Minor League Baseball ◽  
Minor League

Objectives: In the setting of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury, surgical reconstruction of the UCL is not always selected, as it leads to a prolonged recovery time and return to play rates between 67-95%. To date, there is limited data on outcomes following nonoperative treatment in this population. Orthobiologics, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), have recently been used as an adjunct therapy for standard nonoperative treatment including rest and physical therapy for UCL injuries. The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of PRP injections in professional baseball players with UCL injuries reduces recovery time, lowers the likelihood of surgery, and increases the return to play rate compared to traditional nonoperative treatment. Methods: The Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS) database was searched from 2011-2015 for Major and Minor league baseball players with Grade I, II or III UCL injuries. Standard demographic, injury, and return to play data was obtained for all players. MRI’s for 353 athletes were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist and graded accordingly. Outcomes were compared between players who received PRP injections in addition to traditional nonoperative treatment (PRP group) and players who received traditional nonoperative treatment alone (No PRP group). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s T-test and Chi-square for parametric data. Kaplan Meier’s analysis was used for estimating longevity of the treatment. Results: A total of 544 Major and Minor League Baseball players with UCL tears underwent an initial course of nonoperative treatment (active rest & rehabilitation) for their injury between 2011-2015. Of these, 133 underwent PRP injections plus rehab and 411 underwent rehab alone. There was a significantly higher proportion of Major League Baseball players in the PRP group compared to the No PRP group (25.6% vs 9.0%, P<0.001). There was no difference between the two cohorts in regard to the grade of UCL tear (Figure 1). The players in the PRP group had a significantly longer time before returning to a throwing program compared to the No PRP group (64 days vs 51 days, P<0.001). The mean time from injury date to PRP injection was 14.5 days, which may explain the difference in time to return to throwing. The return to play rate in a live game without surgery was significantly lower in the PRP group compared to the No PRP group (46% vs 57%, P=0.03). There was no difference in the proportion of athletes requiring UCL reconstruction (58% vs 51%) or the time to surgery (154 days vs 178 days) between the two groups. Kaplan Meier survivor analysis showed no difference between the PRP and No PRP groups with regard to longevity of the native UCL (Figure 2). Conclusion: Among Major and Minor League Baseball players who were treated nonoperatively for a UCL injury between 2011-2015, 24% underwent PRP injections prior to rehab. Compared to traditional nonoperative rehab alone program, players who received PRP injections experienced a significantly longer time before returning to throwing, which may be in part due to the delay between the injury date and PRP injection. PRP injections did not appear to have a significant effect on the likelihood of surgical intervention.

scholarly journals Performance and Return to Sport Following Ulnar Nerve Transposition/Decompression in Professional Baseball Players

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0016
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Peter Nissen Chalmers ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Kevin Ma ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Nerve Decompression ◽  
Ulnar Nerve Transposition ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Nerve Transposition

Background: Isolated ulnar nerve decompression/transposition is an uncommon surgery amongst professional baseball players. Purpose: To determine the rate of return to sport (RTS) and performance upon RTS in professional baseball players following isolated ulnar nerve decompression/transposition, including those who required an ulnar nerve transposition/decompression following ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR), and to determine if outcomes differ between players with isolated ulnar nerve decompression/transposition and matched controls. Hypothesis: There is a high rate of RTS in professional baseball players undergoing isolated ulnar nerve decompression/transposition with no significant difference in RTS rate or performance (specifically related to the primary outcome performance variables of earned run average (ERA), WHIP ((walks +hits)/innings pitched), wins above replacement (WAR), and on base + slugging percentage (OPS)) between cases and controls. Methods: All professional baseball players who underwent isolated ulnar nerve decompression/transposition between 2010-2016 were included. Demographic and performance data (pre and post surgery) for each player was recorded. Performance metrics were then compared between cases and a group of matched controls. Results: Overall 52 players, 83% pitchers (14 who underwent prior UCLR) were included. Most surgeries (92%) were anterior subcutaneous transpositions. Overall, 62% of players were able to successfully RTS and 56% returned to the same or a higher level. There was no significant difference between cases and controls in the majority of performance metrics pre-operative or post-operatively, specifically ERA, WHIP, WAR, and OPS. When players who had a UCLR prior to their ulnar nerve transposition/decompression were compared to controls with a history of a UCLR but who did not go on to have an ulnar nerve transposition/decompression, the only performance difference of all the recorded metrics was cases allowed more walks per 9 innings (4.4 vs. 2.8; p=0.011). Conclusion: Anterior subcutaneous transposition is the most common surgery in professional baseball players to address ulnar nerve compression. Players have a 62% rate of RTS. Upon RTS, players performance compared to matched controls remains the same in the majority of performance metrics including ERA, WHIP, WAR, and OPS. Post-operatively, pitchers with a UCLR prior to ulnar nerve transposition/decompression performed the same as matched controls with prior UCLR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document