Book Review: Knowledge mobilization and educational research, by T. Fenwick and L. Farrell

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-174
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Shaffer
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Snezana Ratkovic ◽  
Dolana Mogadime ◽  
Terry Spencer

In this special issue of Brock Education: Journal for Educational Research and Practice, we build on the knowledge mobilization (KMb) discourses initiated by the Ontario Ministry of Education (MOE), Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), Knowledge Network for Applied Education Research (KNAER), Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE), and School District-University Research Exchange (SURE) network. We feature five journal articles and a book review addressing the three main KMb questions: How to assess KMb efforts across educational systems?  To what extent do educators use research to inform their praxis? How to make KMb work?


AERA Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 233285841775013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo E. Fischman ◽  
Kate T. Anderson ◽  
Adai A. Tefera ◽  
Steven J. Zuiker

This article explores faculty perspectives at three colleges of education regarding strategies of knowledge mobilization for scholarship in education (KMSE), with consideration for the opportunities and challenges that accompany individual and organizational capacities for change. Faculty surveys ( n = 66) and follow-up interviews ( n = 22) suggest two important trends: First, KMSE presents both a complementary agenda and a competing demand; second, barriers and uncertainties characterize the relevance of knowledge mobilization for faculty careers in colleges of education. This study empirically illuminates the persistence of long-standing challenges regarding the relevance, accessibility, and usability of research in colleges of education housed in research-intensive universities. While KMSE holds promise for expanding the reach and impact of educational research, scholarly tensions underlying these trends suggest that individual and organizational efforts will suffice only with modifications to university procedures for identifying what counts as recognizable, assessable, and rewardable scholarly products and activities for faculty careers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document