Gentamicin and Tobramycin Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Patients

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1127-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamala A Jacobson ◽  
Nina J West ◽  
Jessica Price ◽  
Raymond J Hutchinson

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin and tobramycin in pediatric bone marrow transplant patients. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. Setting: Pediatric bone marrow transplant unit in a university teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pharmacokinetic parameters (apparent volume of distribution [Vd] in L/kg, half-life [t1/2] in h, elimination rate constant [ke] in h−1, clearance [Cl] in mL/min/1.73 m2 and mL/min/kg) calculated from serum concentrations. PATIENTS: Thirty-three patients aged 15 years or less who underwent bone marrow transplant and received gentamicin or tobramycin. RESULTS: Mean pharmacokinetic parameters were Vd 0.32 ± 0.07 L/kg, t1/2 2.32 ± 0.65 h, Cl 1.71 ± 0.53 mL/min/kg, and Cl 86.2 ± 24.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. Factors such as disease state, type of marrow graft, gender, or exposure to cyclosporine had no significant effect on pharmacokinetic parameters. Linear regression indicated a weak relationship between serum creatinine (SCr) and Cl in mL/min/kg (r = 0.59), but no relationship was found between SCr and Cl in mL/min/1.73 m2, between age and apparent Vd, or between SCr and apparent Vd. Models for estimating Cl and ke developed by multiple regression were somewhat predictive (r = 0.7). Required calculated maintenance dosages to obtain therapeutic concentrations were 8, 7, and 6 mg/kg/d in children 6 or younger, 7–12, and 13–15 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mean Cl and apparent Vd for all ages are similar to those reported in pediatric oncology patients who had not undergone marrow transplantation. Children 6 years or younger had lower than expected Cls and larger apparent Vds than did the older children. Dosages estimated to be necessary to achieve therapeutic concentrations were 6–8 mg/kg/d.

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
James S. Partyka ◽  
Cheryl Tate

Objective. To review the pharmacokinetics profile of (HD-BU) high-dose busulfan, review published phar macodynamic relationships of high-dose busulfan and discuss clinical considerations of monitoring patients receiving high-dose busulfan. Data Sources. A MEDLINE search of articles published from 1985 to 1996 and a Cancerlit search of articles published from 1988 to 1996, using the Mesh headings "Busulfan (subheading: pharmacokinetics)," "Bone Marrow Transplantation" and "Hepatic Veno occlusive Disease." Study Selection. All human trials evaluating the pharmacokinetic profile and the pharmacodynamic relationships of high-dose busulfan in bone marrow transplant patients. Data Synthesis. Busulfan disposition has been extensively studied in both children and adults receiv ing high doses followed by stem cell rescue. Sample sizes ranged from 7 to 28 patients, with patients ranging from 0.3 to 60 years of age. Busulfan total doses ranged from 14 mg/kg to 640 mg/m2. A large interpatient variability has been reported in busulfan pharmacokinetics parameters for both children and adults. In adults, the maximum concentration (Cmax) achieved after the first oral dose of HD-BU ranged from 249 to 1512 ng/mL, the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) ranged from 0.56 to 0.66 L/kg, the total plasma clearance (CL) of busulfan ranged from 2.49 to 3.26 mL/min/kg, and the area under the time versus concentration curve (AUC) ranged from 103 to 21,120 ng h/mL. In children, the Cmax ranged from 577 to 1258 ng/mL, the Vd ranged from 0.74 to 1.42 L/kg, the CL of busulfan ranged from 3.26 to 8.91 mL/min/kg, and the AUC ranged from 309 to 13,129 ng h/mL. Several investigators have reported in creased busulfan CL, larger Vd and lower Cmax in children as compared to adults. In addition, children have lower AUCs as compared with adults when administered a fixed busulfan dose based on body weight. Lower busulfan AUCs in children appear to be the result of an increased systemic clearance and a larger volume of distribution as compared to adults. In adults, HD-BU systemic exposure have been corre lated to efficacy and toxicity in some studies; no prospective studies in children have established a clear role for routinely monitoring busulfan concen trations. Conclusions. Although routine monitoring with dosage adjustment of busulfan is probably warranted in some patients with extremely high or low busulfan plasma concentrations, clinical studies should con tinue to further define a therapeutic range for HD-BU.


Author(s):  
Cameron K. Ledford ◽  
Alexander R. Vap ◽  
Michael P. Bolognesi ◽  
Samuel S. Wellman

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S198-S199
Author(s):  
P. Emerson ◽  
S. Mahendran ◽  
L. Stefani ◽  
T. Deshmukh ◽  
S. Trivedi ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan S Biel ◽  
Andreas Nitsche ◽  
Andreas Kurth ◽  
Wolfgang Siegert ◽  
Muhsin Özel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: We studied electron microscopy (EM) as an appropriate test system for the detection of polyomavirus in urine samples from bone marrow transplant patients. Methods: We evaluated direct EM, ultracentrifugation (UC) before EM, and solid-phase immuno-EM (SPIEM). The diagnostic accuracy of EM was studied by comparison with a real-time PCR assay on 531 clinical samples. Results: The detection rate of EM was increased by UC and SPIEM. On 531 clinical urine samples, the diagnostic sensitivity of EM was 47% (70 of 149) with a specificity of 100%. We observed a linear relationship between viral genome concentration and the proportion of urine samples positive by EM, with a 50% probability for a positive EM result for urine samples with a polyomavirus concentration of 106 genome-equivalents (GE)/mL; the probability of a positive EM result was 0% for urine samples with <103 GE/mL and 100% for urine samples containing 109 GE/mL. Conclusions: UC/EM is rapid and highly specific for polyomavirus in urine. Unlike real-time PCR, EM has low sensitivity and cannot quantify the viral load.


BMJ ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 1 (5739) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. O. Solberg ◽  
H. J. Meuwissen ◽  
R. N. Needham ◽  
R. A. Good ◽  
J. M. Matsen

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohail Khattak ◽  
John W. Rogan ◽  
E. Fred Saunders ◽  
Jochen G. W. Theis ◽  
Gerald S. Arbus ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-159
Author(s):  
Kay Washington ◽  
William Peters ◽  
Marcia R. Gottfried

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document