Imminent Death Donation: Ethical and Practical Policy Considerations

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 524-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Potter

While the practice of organ donation after cardiac death has long been trending upwards in acceptance and use, it is still a highly controversial and practically inefficient method of organ procurement. One policy that has recently been proposed to try and alleviate some of the ethical and practical concerns with organ donation after cardiac death is the practice of imminent death organ donation. This type of live organ donation comes in patients at the end of their life who have decided to withdraw life-sustaining treatment, but still want to ensure that their organs are donated and not wasted, which isn't always the case with organ donation after cardiac death. This paper then gives some ethical and practical reflections and recommendations regarding the potential implementation of this controversial practice into regular transplant practice and policy.

Author(s):  
Caitlin D. Sutton ◽  
David G. Mann

The need for organ transplantation is ever increasing. Currently there are 115,000 people on the waitlist and the number is still growing. Organs that are transplanted may be obtained via a living or deceased donor. The organs may be obtained from a deceased donor after either brain death or after cardiac death. The majority of deceased donor organ transplants occur via deceased donor after brain death; however, deceased donor after cardiac death organ donation is increasing. This concept of organ transplantation can be quite difficult to discuss with families, therefore, the anesthesiologist and the entire care team must be knowledgeable and respectful regarding the patient’s and families wishes. The team should also be familiar with the overall process and organ procurement protocols of the institution. By having respectful, thoughtful, early discussions regarding the potential for organ donation, families will be able to make better informed decisions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahed Toossi ◽  
Catherine Lomen-Hoerth ◽  
S. Andrew Josephson ◽  
Michael A. Gropper ◽  
John Roberts ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin E. O’Brien ◽  
Anna Noguchi ◽  
James C. Fackler

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas I. Cochrane

Brain death is the state of irreversible loss of the clinical functions of the brain. A patient must meet strict criteria to be declared brain dead. They must have suffered a known and demonstrably irreversible brain injury and must not have a condition that could render neurologic testing unreliable. If the patient meets these criteria, a formal brain death examination can be performed. The three findings in brain death are coma or unresponsiveness, absence of brainstem reflexes, and apnea. Brain death is closely tied to organ donation, because brain-dead patients represent approximately 90% of deceased donors and thus a large majority of donated organs. This review details a definition and overview of brain death, determination of brain death, and controversy over brain death, as well as the types of organ donation (living donation versus deceased donation), donation after brain death, and donation after cardiac death. A figure presents a comparison of organ donation after brain death and after cardiac death, and a table lists the American Academy of Neurology Criteria for Determination of Brain Death. This review contains 1 highly rendered figure, 3 table, and 20 references.


2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-41
Author(s):  
B.D. Shames ◽  
A.M. D'Alessandro ◽  
A. Krichevsky ◽  
H.W. Sollinger

2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 599-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Truog

2020 ◽  
pp. medethics-2019-105999
Author(s):  
Annet Glas

Given the dramatic shortage of transplantable organs, demand cannot be met by established and envisioned organ procurement policies targeting postmortem donation. Live organ donation (LOD) is a medically attractive option, and ethically permissible if informed consent is given and donor beneficence balances recipient non-maleficence. Only a few legal and regulatory frameworks incentivise LOD, with the key exception of Israel’s Organ Transplant Law, which has produced significant improvements in organ donation rates. Therefore, I propose an organ procurement system that incentivises LOD by allocating additional priority points to the living donor on any transplant waiting list. I outline benefits and challenges for potential recipients, donors and society at large, and suggest measures to ensure medical protection of marginalised patient groups.


2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 599-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Hernadez-Alejandro ◽  
William Wall ◽  
Anthony Jevnikar ◽  
Patrick Luke ◽  
Michael Sharpe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document