Optical coherence tomography angiography and choroidal neovascularization in multifocal choroiditis: A descriptive study

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 614-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Dutheil ◽  
Jean-François Korobelnik ◽  
Marie-Noëlle Delyfer ◽  
Marie-Bénédicte Rougier

Purpose: To analyze the ability of optical coherence tomography angiography to identify choroidal neovascularization in multifocal choroiditis and to describe active and inactive choroidal neovascularization findings. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive patients with multifocal choroiditis and choroidal neovascularization examined between January and November 2016. In addition to usual exams, optical coherence tomography angiography (AngioPlex™ CIRRUS™ HD-OCT model 5000; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA) images were assessed for morphological analysis: choroidal neovascularization size, choroidal neovascularization margin (well or poorly circumscribed), choroidal neovascularization shape (tangled or interlacing), choroidal neovascularization core (feeder vessel) and dark ring around the choroidal neovascularization. Results: A total of 10 eyes were included. Optical coherence tomography angiography identified all choroidal neovascularization. Active choroidal neovascularization had well-circumscribed margins (67%), interlacing shape (83%), and a surrounding dark ring (83%). Inactive choroidal neovascularization had rather poorly circumscribed margins (75%), tangled shape, and “dead tree” appearance (50%) with less frequently a surrounding dark ring (50%). Conclusion: Optical coherence tomography angiography is adapted to confirm the diagnosis of choroidal neovascularization complicating multifocal choroiditis, but it is still insufficient to differentiate active and inactive lesions.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Xi Chen ◽  
Mei-Ling Liu ◽  
Kai Cao ◽  
Mayinuer Yusufu ◽  
Jin-Da Wang

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in detecting the choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in agerelated macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching Pubmed, Science Direct, Embase and Web of Science. The pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve (sROC), and the total accurate classification rate were used to evaluate OCTA’ diagnostic value of CNV in AMD patients. Results: Seven studies involving 517 eyes were included in the analysis. The mean age of subjects in each study ranged from 58.5 years to 81.7 years. Fluorescein angiography was applied as the gold standard in five studies. There were 350 eyes diagnosed with CNV, OCTA detected 301 eyes correctly, while among the 167 eyes without CNV, OCTA identified 150 correctly. The total accurate classification rate was 87.23%. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.5, indicating that there was no significant threshold effect in the current study (S=8, p=0.103). The pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity were 0.89 (95%CI: 0.82,0.94) and 0.96 (95%CI: 0.85,1.00) respectively. The area under sROC was up to 0.911. Conclusion: The specificity of OCTA for the detection of CNV in AMD patients is extremely high, however, the sensitivity still needs to be improved. In general, the metaanalysis revealed that OCTA had a high diagnostic value for the detection of CNV in AMD patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flore De Bats ◽  
Pierre-Loïc Cornut ◽  
Benjamin Wolff ◽  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
Martine Mauget-Faÿsse

Purpose: To describe abnormal dark (hyposignal) and white (hypersignal) lesions observed on optical coherence tomography angiography in central serous chorioretinopathy. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, and descriptive study including patients with active or quiescent central serous chorioretinopathy. All patients had undergone a complete ophthalmic examination. Results: Abnormal dark lesions were detected as “dark spots” and “dark areas” on optical coherence tomography angiography. A “dark spot” could correspond to six different abnormalities: pigment epithelium detachment, subretinal deposit, “Lucency” within surrounding subretinal fibrin, choroidal cavitation, choroidal excavation, and choroidal fluid. A “dark area” could be related to a serous retinal detachment or choriocapillary compression. Abnormal white lesions were also detected: A “white spot” could correspond with the leaking point on fluorescein angiography or with hyper-reflective dots; A “white filamentous pattern” at the Brüch’s membrane level corresponded to abnormal choroidal neovascular vessels. Conclusion: A semiology is described using optical coherence tomography angiography in central serous chorioretinopathy as abnormal dark and white lesions. Multimodal imaging is mandatory in addition to optical coherence tomography angiography to diagnose non-neovascular retinal and choroidal central serous chorioretinopathy lesions. However, optical coherence tomography angiography alone is helpful in detecting choroidal neovascular membrane in central serous chorioretinopathy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document