Long Term Results of Cementless Total Hip Replacement for Reversal of hip Ankylosis

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel S. Rajaratnam ◽  
Shaun A. Sexton ◽  
Tim S. Waters ◽  
William L. Walter ◽  
Bernard A. Zicat ◽  
...  

Fifteen patients (16 hips) with an ankylosed hip joint for a mean of 36 years (3.5 to 65), had their hips converted to a cementless Total Hip Replacement (THR). They were followed-up for a median of 10.75 years (5.0 to 19) with none lost to follow-up. All patients showed improved mobility and function post-operatively. The Harris Hip Score improved from 70 (SEM 3.4) to 83 post-operatively (SEM 4.4), which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was one acetabular cup revision at 5 years post implantation for aseptic loosening. All other femoral and acetabular components remained clinically and radiographically well fixed. We conclude that a previously ankylosed hip can be effectively converted to a cementless total hip replacement with good long term results.

1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul F. Lachiewicz ◽  
Byron D. Rosenstein

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Engin Çarkçı ◽  
Ayse Esin Polat ◽  
Yusuf Öztürkmen ◽  
Tolga Tüzüner

Objective: In this study we aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and radiological results, revision rates and causes, and the rate of implant survival in total hip arthroplasty performed using CLS® expansion cup and Spotorno® cementless femoral stem. Methods: Clinical results of total hip arthroplasty performed on 131 hips of 114 patients in Istanbul Training and Research Hospital between 1993 and 2003 were retrospectively evaluated according to the Harris Hip Score. Revision rates were determined and implant survival rates were identified using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results: Of the patients, 39 were males and 75 were females. The average age of the patients at surgery was 48.7±11.3 years. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 13.9±2.4 years. The mean Harris Hip Score was 34.35±6.09 preoperatively and 88.20±7.11 at the final follow-up (p<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate for the cup at 13.9 years, taking revision for any reason as the end point was 95.6% (95% CI), while the 15th and 17th year survival rates were 90% and 85%, respectively. Conclusion: In total hip arthroplasty using a cementless expansive acetabular cup, a 95.6% survival rate is achieved after an average of 14 years, whereas the rate decreases to 85% after 17 years. Even if the incidence of cup breakage is reduced with proper implantation, particle disease and periacetabular osteolysis remains a problem for the long-term survival. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3089 How to cite this:Carkci E, Polat AE, Ozturkmen Y, Tuzuner T. Long-Term results of total Hip Arthroplasty performed using a cementless expansive Acetabular Cup and Spotorno Femoral Stem. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):52-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3089 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai Mao ◽  
Baomin Chen ◽  
Ying Zhu ◽  
Liang Qian ◽  
Jinluan Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cemented or uncemented total hip replacement (CTR or UTR) for femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA type 31B/C) is a relatively common procedure in elderly individuals. The recent literature is limited regarding long-term outcomes following CTR versus UTR in the Asian population. Methods Using our institutional database, we performed long-term outcome analysis on 268 patients with femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA type 31B/C) who had undergone a primary UTR or CTR (CTR: n = 132, mean age, 67.43 ± 6.51 years; UTR: n = 136, mean age, 67.65 ± 6.13 years) during 2007–2014, and these patients were followed until 2019. Follow-up occurred 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. The primary endpoint was the Harris hip score (HHS); the secondary endpoint was the incidence of orthopaedic complications. Results The mean follow-up time was 62.5 months (range, 50.1–76.1 months). At the final follow-up, the HHS was 79.39 ± 16.92 vs 74.18 ± 17.55 (CTR vs UTR, respectively, p = 0.011). Between-group significant differences were observed regarding the incidence of prosthesis revision, prosthesis loosening, and periprosthetic fracture (7.6% [95% CI, 6.4–8.2] for CTR vs 16.9% [95% CI, 14.7–17.3] for UTR, p = 0.020; 9.8% [95% CI, 8.3–10.7] for CTR vs 19.9% [95% CI, 18.2–20.9] for UTR, p = 0.022; 5.3% [95% CI, 4.4–6.7] for CTR vs 13.2% [95% CI, 12.1–13.8] for UTR, p = 0.026, respectively). Conclusion CTR showed superiority to UTR by improving the HHS and decreasing the incidence of orthopaedic complications. Our findings need to be confirmed in a prospective, randomized controlled study to verify whether they can be applicable to a broader population.


1990 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-171
Author(s):  
Kozo Sagara ◽  
Katsuro Iwasaki ◽  
Kenji Yamada ◽  
Katsuro Takahashi ◽  
Kitau Teshima

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. e25(1)-e25(7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Traina ◽  
Marcello De Fine ◽  
Alessandra Sudanese ◽  
Pierina Paola Calderoni ◽  
Enrico Tassinari ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 329 (8537) ◽  
pp. 860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francoise Doyon ◽  
Jacques Evrard ◽  
François Mazas ◽  
Catherine Hill

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document