Large Iliac Arteries: A High-Risk Group for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciaran O. McDonnell ◽  
James B. Semmens ◽  
Yvonne B. Allen ◽  
Shirley J. Jansen ◽  
D. Mark Brooks ◽  
...  

Purpose: To examine if the presence of large iliac arteries is a potential risk factor for the development of a type Ib endoleak (iliac sealing zone) or need for iliac artery—related secondary intervention in patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods: The medical notes and all preoperative and postoperative plain abdominal radiographs and computer tomographic scans were reviewed for a consecutive series of 100 patients (89 men; mean age 75 years, range 56–91) with large iliac arteries (mean 19.7 mm, range 16–22) who had Zenith endovascular stent-grafts inserted for management of aortoiliac aneurysmal disease from January 1999 until September 2002. Endpoints were all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related death, endoleak, secondary intervention, secondary interventions, and stent-graft migration. Results: Mean follow-up was 30.1±8.3 months; at the last follow-up, 30% of patients were dead, 3% were aneurysm-related. Seven (7%) patients developed a type Ib endoleak, with the remainder being type II (29%), type Ia (2%), type III (1%), and type V (endotension, 1%). Eight (27.5%) type II endoleaks persisted, with the remainder closing spontaneously with sac shrinkage. The iliac artery—related secondary intervention rate was 10%, and the overall secondary intervention rate was 16%. Conclusion: Iliac arteries between 16 and 22 mm in diameter may be treated with a cuff to the iliac limb with an expectation of 90% efficacy. Surveillance is required, with a high index of suspicion for type 1b endoleaks. Early secondary iliac intervention with extension to the external iliac artery is recommended if there is an increase in sac size after 6 months.

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciaran O. McDonnell ◽  
James B. Semmens ◽  
Yvonne B. Allen ◽  
Shirley J. Jansen ◽  
D. Mark Brooks ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. e95-e96
Author(s):  
Heepeel Chang ◽  
Frank J. Veith ◽  
Caron B. Rockman ◽  
Neal S. Cayne ◽  
Glenn R. Jacobowitz ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Daoudal ◽  
Alain Cardon ◽  
Jean-Philippe Verhoye ◽  
Elodie Clochard ◽  
Antoine Lucas ◽  
...  

Limb occlusion is a well-known complication following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and it very often leads to reoperation. The aim of this study is to identify predictive factors for limb occlusion following EVAR. Two hundred and twenty-four patients undergoing EVAR between 2004 and 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Demographics, anatomic, and follow-up data were compared between two groups (with or without thrombosis). Preoperative anatomy was analyzed with a dedicated workstation, using the Society of Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Eleven (4.9%) patients presented with a limb occlusion during follow-up (46 ± 12 months). Univariate analyses were first performed to investigate the influence of preoperative variables on limb occlusion. Then, variables with a p value <0.1 were included in the multivariate analysis and showed that in the occlusion group there was a greater rate of chronic renal failure (18.2% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.012), a more frequent occurrence of distal landing zones in the external iliac artery (15.4% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.006), and a smaller aortic neck diameter (21.0 ± 2.9 mm vs. 23.6 ± 3.3 mm, p = 0.014). Although iliac anatomy does not appear to have a significant influence on limb occlusion rate in the multivariate analysis, proximal and distal sealing zones appear to be involved in this complication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document