scholarly journals Original Research: Diametric effects of hypoxia on pathophysiology of sickle cell disease in a murine model

2016 ◽  
Vol 241 (7) ◽  
pp. 766-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Tan ◽  
Samit Ghosh ◽  
Mario Mosunjac ◽  
Elizabeth Manci ◽  
Solomon Fiifi Ofori-Acquah
2006 ◽  
Vol 169 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio P. Juncos ◽  
Joseph P. Grande ◽  
Narayana Murali ◽  
Anthony J. Croatt ◽  
Luis A. Juncos ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 174 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jintao Wang ◽  
Jennifer Tran ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Chiao Guo ◽  
David Harro ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik A. Karlsson ◽  
Thomas H. Oguin ◽  
Victoria Meliopoulos ◽  
Amy Iverson ◽  
Alexandria Broadnax ◽  
...  

Pain ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (7) ◽  
pp. 1382-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Cataldo ◽  
Mary M. Lunzer ◽  
Julie K. Olson ◽  
Eyup Akgün ◽  
John D. Belcher ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 51-60.e1
Author(s):  
Harit Panda ◽  
Nadine Keleku-Lukwete ◽  
Ayumi Kuga ◽  
Nobuo Fuke ◽  
Hiroyuki Suganuma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (19) ◽  
pp. 3855-3861
Author(s):  
Sindy N. Escobar Alvarez ◽  
Elizabeth R. Myers

Abstract More than 20 years ago, clinical trials and federal grant support for sickle cell disease (SCD) research were not on par with support for other genetic diseases. Faced with the opportunity to spur research and advance treatments for SCD, and at the recommendation of advisors, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (DDCF) offered an SCD research funding opportunity starting in 2009 through its Innovations in Clinical Research Awards (ICRA) program. Twenty-eight new grants of $450 000 for direct costs over 3 years and 7 renewals were awarded, for a total investment of $17 million. Only about half the research teams garnered follow-on funding directly related to their ICRA projects, but the financial return on the research investment was substantial (∼4 times the original $17 million or 300%). All but 1 of the ICRA investigative teams published original research reports that acknowledged DDCF as a source of funding; the median number of publications per team was 3. Major innovations in the diagnosis and treatment of SCD included but were not limited to a demonstration that genetic modification of BCL11A enhancer is a potentially important treatment modality, establishment that plerixafor mobilization is safe and effective for those with SCD, development and validation of a new diagnostic called SCD BioChip, and evidence that hydroxyurea treatment is safe and efficacious in African children. These outcomes show that relatively small research grants can have a substantial return on investment and result in significant advances for a disease such as SCD.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif M Badawy ◽  
Robert M Cronin ◽  
Jane Hankins ◽  
Lori Crosby ◽  
Michael DeBaun ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Sickle cell disease is an inherited blood disorder that affects over 100,000 Americans. Sickle cell disease–related complications lead to significant morbidity and early death. Evidence supporting the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of self-management electronic health (eHealth) interventions in chronic diseases is growing; however, the evidence is unclear in sickle cell disease. OBJECTIVE We systematically evaluated the most recent evidence in the literature to (1) review the different types of technological tools used for self-management of sickle cell disease, (2) discover and describe what self-management activities these tools were used for, and (3) assess the efficacy of these technologies in self-management. METHODS We reviewed literature published between 1995 and 2016 with no language limits. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and other sources. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, assessed full-text articles, and extracted data from articles that met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies were original research articles that included texting, mobile phone–based apps, or other eHealth interventions designed to improve self-management in pediatric and adult patients with sickle cell disease. RESULTS Of 1680 citations, 16 articles met all predefined criteria with a total of 747 study participants. Interventions were text messaging (4/16, 25%), native mobile apps (3/16, 19%), Web-based apps (5/16, 31%), mobile directly observed therapy (2/16, 13%), internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (2/16, 13%), electronic pill bottle (1/16, 6%), or interactive gamification (2/16, 13%). Interventions targeted monitoring or improvement of medication adherence (5/16, 31%); self-management, pain reporting, and symptom reporting (7/16, 44%); stress, coping, sleep, and daily activities reporting (4/16, 25%); cognitive training for memory (1/16, 6%); sickle cell disease and reproductive health knowledge (5/16, 31%); cognitive behavioral therapy (2/16, 13%); and guided relaxation interventions (1/16, 6%). Most studies (11/16, 69%) included older children or adolescents (mean or median age 10-17 years; 11/16, 69%) and 5 included young adults (≥18 years old) (5/16, 31%). Sample size ranged from 11 to 236, with a median of 21 per study: <20 in 6 (38%), ≥20 to <50 in 6 (38%), and >50 participants in 4 studies (25%). Most reported improvement in self-management–related outcomes (15/16, 94%), as well as high satisfaction and acceptability of different study interventions (10/16, 63%). CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review identified eHealth interventions measuring a variety of outcomes, which showed improvement in multiple components of self-management of sickle cell disease. Despite the promising feasibility and acceptability of eHealth interventions in improving self-management of sickle cell disease, the evidence overall is modest. Future eHealth intervention studies are needed to evaluate their efficacy, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness in promoting self-management in patients with sickle cell disease using rigorous methods and theoretical frameworks with clearly defined clinical outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document