Clinical Significance of Standing versus Reversed Trendelenburg Position for the Diagnosis of Lower-Extremity Venous Reflux in the Great Saphenous Vein

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Patrick DeMuth ◽  
Kathy Caylor ◽  
Tina Walton ◽  
LuAnne Leondar ◽  
Eric Rosero ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 470-474
Author(s):  
Sinan Deniz ◽  
Derya Tureli ◽  
Burcu Akpinar ◽  
Levent Oguzkurt

Purpose To elaborate on a planar anatomic variant of great saphenous vein as a potential therapeutic pitfall in the treatment of venous reflux. Materials and methods Lower extremity veins in 568 limbs with great saphenous vein insufficiency were sonographically mapped. A rather overlooked variation, the saphenous bow, was studied with emphasis on anatomic clarification and its involvement in venous insufficiency. Results This variation, observed in 5.1% (n = 29) of limbs, comprised two segments; one uninterrupted great saphenous vein proper coursing throughout saphenous compartment and one extra-compartmental segment originating distally from and proximally fusing with it. Venous arch remains within compartment only briefly during take-off and re-entry. Extra-compartmental venous arch had reflux either alone (10.3%) or together with intra-compartmental segment (75.9%). Conclusion This variation, part of saphenous segmental aplasia/hypoplasia complex, is associated with venous insufficiency. Meticulous mapping of great saphenous vein territory and identification of such variants during planning stage is indispensable for optimal clinical outcomes of treatment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 500-500

The clinical significance of below-knee great saphenous vein reflux following endovenous laser ablation of above-knee great saphenous vein, by NS Theivacumar, RJ Darwood, D Dellagrammaticas, AID Mavor, MJ Gough, Phlebology DOI:10.1258/phleb.2008.008004, published February 2009; 24 (1): 17–20 . The authors would like to note the following correction to their article: One of the co-authors’ names was misspelled; it appears as “Dellegrammaticas”; however, it should be spelt “Dellagrammaticas”.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1534-1542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kronick ◽  
Timothy K. Liem ◽  
Enjae Jung ◽  
Cherrie Z. Abraham ◽  
Gregory L. Moneta ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Chait ◽  
Pavel Kibrik ◽  
Kevin Kenney ◽  
Ahmad Alsheekh ◽  
Yuriy Ostrozhynskyy ◽  
...  

Objective Iliac vein stenting has been an evolving treatment option in the management of CVI secondary to iliac vein obstruction. Historically, treatment of CVI has been focused on the elimination of saphenous vein disease; however, the effect of reduction of iliac vein obstruction on superficial venous reflux remains largely unknown. This study aimed to identify the effect of iliac vein stenting on saphenous vein reflux. Methods In this retrospective study spanning course of five years, we performed 2681 venograms with venoplasties and stenting of the iliac veins. Pre-operative and post-operative venous mapping was performed via duplex ultrasonography. Patients who received any lower extremity vascular intervention between “pre-” and “post-stenting” duplex ultrasonography examination, other than iliac vein stenting, were excluded from analysis. Results One thousand six hundred forty-five patients, of which 63.2% were female, underwent iliac vein stenting; 1033 patients received bilateral intervention, whereas 356 and 259 patients received unilateral left and right stenting, respectively. The average age of the patient cohort was 66 (range 22–100; SD ± 13.9). The distribution CEAP scores of each limb at the time of intervention were: C2 (1%), C3 (25%), C4 (51%), C5 (5%), and C6 (18%). Bilateral iliac vein stenting significantly reduced reflux in the bilateral great saphenous and small saphenous veins by 363.8 ms ( p < 0.0001) and 345.4 ms ( p < 0.0002), respectively, but had no effect on ASV reflux. Unilateral stenting did not produce significant reductions in reflux, besides an average reduction of 573.2 ms ( p = 0.004) in the left great saphenous vein. Conclusion Bilateral iliac vein stenting decreased great saphenous vein and small saphenous vein reflux. Unilateral stenting did not demonstrate a significant reduction in saphenous reflux. Bilateral reduction in stenosis of the iliac veins may influence superficial venous reflux.


2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. e160-e161
Author(s):  
Michael S. Segal ◽  
Bishoy Emmanuel ◽  
Mohammad Gilani ◽  
Mohan Badhey ◽  
Mahalingham Sivakumar

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 332-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elif Evrim Ekin ◽  
Hülya Kurtul Yildiz

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.V.L. Barros ◽  
N. Labropoulos ◽  
A.L.P. Ribeiro ◽  
R.Y. Okawa ◽  
F.S. Machado

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document